You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.
look again stays twice apart -
03-11-2008, 01:45 PM
Which is true: love at 1st sight, hate at 2nd sight, or familiarity breeds contempt? In the 1964 fiction novelized timeless exploits of secret agent 007; author Ian Fleming inserted a quotation on the page facing the table of content, allegedly made by the Japanese poet Basshō (1643-94) – You only live twice: Once when you are born, And once when you look death in the face. The 1st 4 words served as the title of Fleming’s 12th book in the continuing series of adventure thriller saga of superspy James Bond.
As the words suggest, nothing last forever because nothing really deserved a second look, a second chance; not life and not even probability. Certainty is always atmost unity while reality is fractional, half empty or half full depending whether one is an optimist or a pessimist. It is better to be one death right rather than two wrong lives for a game of life where and when everyone comes out a winner. Both Einstein and Feynman were each given second chance at life but both turned down the offer.
However, for a photon of light, if it is reflected or oscillated between parallel mirrors, its energy doubled. If reflected again, its energy quadrupled, so on and so forth as powers of 2. Ceaseless steps of repeated reflections allow a single photon to store limitless supply of energy for future use. This becomes the true working principle for the source of power of all LASERs as collimated amplified coherent monochromatic light.
Time independence: [∂E(g)]˛=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: ¶a(t)·¶r(t)=c˛