Welcome to the Theory of Everything forums.
You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.
| | | | | Raider of the lost time
Status: Offline Posts: 5,205
Thanks Given: 679
Thanked 111x in 110 Posts
Join Date: Nov 2003 Rep Power: 73 | equilibrium population -
03-15-2008, 12:51 PM
At thermal equilibrium, the population (N) for each energy state (E) of an atomic system is inversely proportional to the natural exponential function of energy divided by the product of Boltzmann’s constant (k) and the absolute temperature (T) where constant of proportionality is arbitrarily set to unity: N=1/exp{E/kT}. An equivalent expression is that the product of N and exp{E/kT} is unity: Nexp{E/kT}=1. At different energy states, their populations hold the same unit proportion. Therefore, N(1)exp{E(1)/kT}= N(2)exp{E(2)/kT}= N(3)exp{E(3)/kT}= N(4)exp{E(4)/kT}= N(5)exp{E(5)/kT}= N(6)exp{E(6)/kT}=…= N(∞)exp{E(∞)/kT}. These imply that E(1)< E(2)< E(3)< E(4)< E(5)< E(6)<…< E(∞) while N(1)>N(2)>N(3)>N(4)>N(5)>N(6)>…>N(∞). At both extreme, if E is exactly zero then N is exactly infinite and if E is infinite then N is exactly 1. Since infinite energy is not physically realizable (equivalently, infinite shift of the Hamiltonian cannot be measured), the population can never be exactly 1. At the least, N=2. The philosophical implication of this dualism is that in any domain of reality there always exist two independent fundamental principles, for examples: field (wave) and particle, yin and yang, mind and brain, form and content, potential and kinetic, passive and active, left and right, top and bottom, front and back, life and death, good and evil. Since these dualistic principles are perfectly and absolutely symmetrical in the infinitesimal domain of space-time, understanding them requires a principle of directional invariance for all local infinitesimal motions, uniform or non-uniform; equilibrium or non-equilibrium. Nevertheless, the minimum population number is always 2. Time independence: [∂E(g)]˛=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: ¶a(t)·¶r(t)=c˛ | |
| | | | | | Moderator
Status: Offline Posts: 7,252
Thanks Given: 337
Thanked 643x in 614 Posts
Join Date: Aug 2005 Rep Power: 91 | Re: equilibrium population -
03-15-2008, 01:03 PM
Famine and disease are the usual population decreasers,we are dangerously close to being overpopulated-guess who is coming lunch?
regards michael. Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
reveal herself? | |
| | | The Following User Says Thank You to mkirkpatrick For This Useful Post: | | | | | | Grandmaster
Status: Offline Posts: 3,091
Thanks Given: 293
Thanked 507x in 466 Posts
Join Date: May 2007 Rep Power: 45 | Re: equilibrium population -
03-15-2008, 01:05 PM
Would this indicate you can kiss singularity goodbye, in that we will always have dualism; ( positive/negative, action/reaction, attraction/repulsion, yin/yang )? Best, Pat | |
| | | The Following User Says Thank You to Profpat For This Useful Post: | | | | | | Raider of the lost time
Status: Offline Posts: 5,205
Thanks Given: 679
Thanked 111x in 110 Posts
Join Date: Nov 2003 Rep Power: 73 | Re: equilibrium population -
03-15-2008, 01:12 PM
Quote: |
Originally Posted by mkirkpatrick guess who is coming lunch? | The mystery guest will show up only if the menu is clearly visible and understandable. Quote: |
Originally Posted by Profpat can kiss singularity goodbye | Not a goodbye kiss but a welcome kiss since we need another sigularity to do the kissing, the kisser and the kissee. Time independence: [∂E(g)]˛=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: ¶a(t)·¶r(t)=c˛ | |
| | | | | | Grandmaster
Status: Offline Posts: 3,091
Thanks Given: 293
Thanked 507x in 466 Posts
Join Date: May 2007 Rep Power: 45 | Re: equilibrium population -
03-15-2008, 01:16 PM
Well if Yin is the kisser and Yang the kissee we are back to dualism again, are we not? | |
| | | | | | Moderator
Status: Offline Posts: 7,252
Thanks Given: 337
Thanked 643x in 614 Posts
Join Date: Aug 2005 Rep Power: 91 | Re: equilibrium population -
03-15-2008, 01:16 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by AntonioLao The mystery guest will show up only if the menu is clearly visible and understandable.
Not a goodbye kiss but a welcome kiss since we need another sigularity to do the kissing, the kisser and the kissee. |
The menu grows ripe with the multitude assembled outside,the reaper is sharpening
his sickle.
regards michael. Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
reveal herself? | |
| | | | | | Grandmaster
Status: Offline Posts: 3,091
Thanks Given: 293
Thanked 507x in 466 Posts
Join Date: May 2007 Rep Power: 45 | Re: equilibrium population -
03-15-2008, 01:18 PM
God Michael that sounds like REVELATIONS. | |
| | | | | | Moderator
Status: Offline Posts: 7,252
Thanks Given: 337
Thanked 643x in 614 Posts
Join Date: Aug 2005 Rep Power: 91 | Re: equilibrium population -
03-15-2008, 01:24 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Profpat God Michael that sounds like REVELATIONS. | It will be a revelation Pat when he comes chapping on your door,Don't answer the door
for God's sake,ther's no one there,we are all deaf!
regards michael. Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
reveal herself? | |
| | | | | | Grandmaster
Status: Offline Posts: 3,091
Thanks Given: 293
Thanked 507x in 466 Posts
Join Date: May 2007 Rep Power: 45 | Re: equilibrium population -
03-15-2008, 01:26 PM
What did you say Michael? I'm a little hard of hearing. | |
| | | | | | Moderator
Status: Offline Posts: 7,252
Thanks Given: 337
Thanked 643x in 614 Posts
Join Date: Aug 2005 Rep Power: 91 | Re: equilibrium population -
03-15-2008, 01:29 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Profpat What did you say Michael? I'm a little hard of hearing. | i am too,plus I partially sighted,I see no one,was that the door again Pat?
regards michael. Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
reveal herself? | |
| | |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | | | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | | |