Welcome to the ToeQuest.
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 17
  1. #1
    Raider of the lost time
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    11,778
    Blog Entries
    10
    Thanks Given
    1,106
    Thanked 1,472x in 1,192 Posts
    Rep Power
    158

    equilibrium population

    At thermal equilibrium, the population (N) for each energy state (E) of an atomic system is inversely proportional to the natural exponential function of energy divided by the product of Boltzmann’s constant (k) and the absolute temperature (T) where constant of proportionality is arbitrarily set to unity: N=1/exp{E/kT}. An equivalent expression is that the product of N and exp{E/kT} is unity: Nexp{E/kT}=1. At different energy states, their populations hold the same unit proportion. Therefore, N(1)exp{E(1)/kT}= N(2)exp{E(2)/kT}= N(3)exp{E(3)/kT}= N(4)exp{E(4)/kT}= N(5)exp{E(5)/kT}= N(6)exp{E(6)/kT}=…= N()exp{E()/kT}. These imply that E(1)< E(2)< E(3)< E(4)< E(5)< E(6)<…< E() while N(1)>N(2)>N(3)>N(4)>N(5)>N(6)>…>N(). At both extreme, if E is exactly zero then N is exactly infinite and if E is infinite then N is exactly 1. Since infinite energy is not physically realizable (equivalently, infinite shift of the Hamiltonian cannot be measured), the population can never be exactly 1. At the least, N=2.

    The philosophical implication of this dualism is that in any domain of reality there always exist two independent fundamental principles, for examples: field (wave) and particle, yin and yang, mind and brain, form and content, potential and kinetic, passive and active, left and right, top and bottom, front and back, life and death, good and evil. Since these dualistic principles are perfectly and absolutely symmetrical in the infinitesimal domain of space-time, understanding them requires a principle of directional invariance for all local infinitesimal motions, uniform or non-uniform; equilibrium or non-equilibrium. Nevertheless, the minimum population number is always 2.
    Time independence: [∂E(g)]˛=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c˛

  2. #2
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Posts
    11,621
    Blog Entries
    5
    Thanks Given
    295
    Thanked 896x in 724 Posts
    Rep Power
    154

    Smile Re: equilibrium population

    Famine and disease are the usual population decreasers,we are dangerously close to being overpopulated-guess who is coming lunch?



    regards michael.
    Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
    reveal herself?

  3. #3
    Grandmaster
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    6,657
    Thanks Given
    836
    Thanked 1,049x in 746 Posts
    Rep Power
    105

    Re: equilibrium population

    Would this indicate you can kiss singularity goodbye, in that we will always have dualism; ( positive/negative, action/reaction, attraction/repulsion, yin/yang )?

    Best,

    Pat

  4. #4
    Raider of the lost time
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    11,778
    Blog Entries
    10
    Thanks Given
    1,106
    Thanked 1,472x in 1,192 Posts
    Rep Power
    158

    Re: equilibrium population

    Quote Originally Posted by mkirkpatrick
    guess who is coming lunch?
    The mystery guest will show up only if the menu is clearly visible and understandable.
    Quote Originally Posted by Profpat
    can kiss singularity goodbye
    Not a goodbye kiss but a welcome kiss since we need another sigularity to do the kissing, the kisser and the kissee.
    Time independence: [∂E(g)]˛=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c˛

  5. #5
    Grandmaster
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    6,657
    Thanks Given
    836
    Thanked 1,049x in 746 Posts
    Rep Power
    105

    Re: equilibrium population

    Well if Yin is the kisser and Yang the kissee we are back to dualism again, are we not?

  6. #6
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Posts
    11,621
    Blog Entries
    5
    Thanks Given
    295
    Thanked 896x in 724 Posts
    Rep Power
    154

    Smile Re: equilibrium population

    Quote Originally Posted by AntonioLao View Post
    The mystery guest will show up only if the menu is clearly visible and understandable.

    Not a goodbye kiss but a welcome kiss since we need another sigularity to do the kissing, the kisser and the kissee.

    The menu grows ripe with the multitude assembled outside,the reaper is sharpening
    his sickle.


    regards michael.
    Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
    reveal herself?

  7. #7
    Grandmaster
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    6,657
    Thanks Given
    836
    Thanked 1,049x in 746 Posts
    Rep Power
    105

    Re: equilibrium population

    God Michael that sounds like REVELATIONS.

  8. #8
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Posts
    11,621
    Blog Entries
    5
    Thanks Given
    295
    Thanked 896x in 724 Posts
    Rep Power
    154

    Smile Re: equilibrium population

    Quote Originally Posted by Profpat View Post
    God Michael that sounds like REVELATIONS.
    It will be a revelation Pat when he comes chapping on your door,Don't answer the door
    for God's sake,ther's no one there,we are all deaf!



    regards michael.
    Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
    reveal herself?

  9. #9
    Grandmaster
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    6,657
    Thanks Given
    836
    Thanked 1,049x in 746 Posts
    Rep Power
    105

    Re: equilibrium population

    What did you say Michael? I'm a little hard of hearing.

  10. #10
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Posts
    11,621
    Blog Entries
    5
    Thanks Given
    295
    Thanked 896x in 724 Posts
    Rep Power
    154

    Smile Re: equilibrium population

    Quote Originally Posted by Profpat View Post
    What did you say Michael? I'm a little hard of hearing.
    i am too,plus I partially sighted,I see no one,was that the door again Pat?




    regards michael.
    Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
    reveal herself?

 

 
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Back to top