| |  | |  | | Moderator
Join Date: Aug 2005 Posts: 7,749
| |
03-21-2008, 02:10 PM
| Re: sleepless eyes Quote:
Originally Posted by AntonioLao Some theorists think so. I think so too with the added idea that during pair production of electron and positron needs at the minimum 2 energetic light photons easily describable using Hadamard matrices. |
Exactly Antonio,somehow I had a feeling that Hadamard would surface soon!
regars michael.
__________________ Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
reveal herself? | | | | Raider of the lost time
Join Date: Nov 2003 Posts: 6,036
| |
03-21-2008, 02:16 PM
| | Re: sleepless eyes Quote: |
Originally Posted by mkirkpatrick that Hadamard would surface soon | Thanks. It took me a while to realize that Hadamard matrices have more descriptive capabilities compare to quaternions, vectors, tensors, twistors, spinors, and other abstract algebras of hypercomplex numbers.
__________________ Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: ¶a(t)·¶r(t)=c² | | | | Moderator
Join Date: Aug 2005 Posts: 7,749
| |
03-21-2008, 02:19 PM
| Re: sleepless eyes Quote:
Originally Posted by AntonioLao Thanks. It took me a while to realize that Hadamard matrices have more descriptive capabilities compare to quaternions, vectors, tensors, twistors, spinors, and other abstract algebras of hypercomplex numbers. |
They most certaintly are and will lead us to fusions door!
regards michael.
__________________ Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
reveal herself? | | | | Raider of the lost time
Join Date: Nov 2003 Posts: 6,036
| |
03-21-2008, 02:31 PM
| | Re: sleepless eyes Quote: |
Originally Posted by mkirkpatrick will lead us to fusions door | If and only if the sea of negative vacuum potentiality will gave up its cherished virtual beings and the dead will rise again?
__________________ Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: ¶a(t)·¶r(t)=c² | | | | Moderator
Join Date: Aug 2005 Posts: 7,749
| |
03-21-2008, 02:39 PM
| Re: sleepless eyes Quote:
Originally Posted by AntonioLao If and only if the sea of negative vacuum potentiality will gave up its cherished virtual beings and the dead will rise again? |
If I see a Zombie I will email you at once!
regards michael.
__________________ Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
reveal herself? | | | | Raider of the lost time
Join Date: Nov 2003 Posts: 6,036
| |
03-21-2008, 02:49 PM
| | Re: sleepless eyes Quote: |
Originally Posted by mkirkpatrick If I see a Zombie | It would be great if it is Newton, Maxwell, or Einstein!
__________________ Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: ¶a(t)·¶r(t)=c² | | | | Moderator
Join Date: Aug 2005 Posts: 7,749
| |
03-21-2008, 03:20 PM
| Re: sleepless eyes Quote:
Originally Posted by AntonioLao It would be great if it is Newton, Maxwell, or Einstein! |
I will keep a sharp look out for them!
regards michael.
__________________ Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
reveal herself? | | | | Raider of the lost time
Join Date: Nov 2003 Posts: 6,036
| |
03-21-2008, 03:29 PM
| | Re: sleepless eyes Quote: |
Originally Posted by mkirkpatrick I will keep a sharp look out for them | On 2nd thought if they are really zombies then they must also be brainless in that case I don't want them take them back please.
__________________ Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: ¶a(t)·¶r(t)=c² | | | | Moderator
Join Date: Aug 2005 Posts: 7,749
| |
03-21-2008, 03:32 PM
| Re: sleepless eyes Quote:
Originally Posted by AntonioLao On 2nd thought if they are really zombies then they must also be brainless in that case I don't want them take them back please. |
Yes it would seem that your regular zombie is quite brainless!
regards michael.
__________________ Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
reveal herself? | | | | Raider of the lost time
Join Date: Nov 2003 Posts: 6,036
| |
03-21-2008, 03:42 PM
| | Re: sleepless eyes Quote: |
Originally Posted by mkirkpatrick regular zombie is quite brainless | Even the irregular ones are quite hopeless and clueless.
__________________ Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: ¶a(t)·¶r(t)=c² | | | |  | | |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | | | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:19 PM.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.4 Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0 
VBulletin Skin by ForumMonkeys.
| |