Theory of Everything  

  
Go Back   Theory of Everything > Tools > Mathematics
Reload this Page math after 30000 years
Register Website Toe Club Your Blog Arcade

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Re: math after 30000 years
Old
  (#11 (permalink))
Raider of the lost time
AntonioLao is just really niceAntonioLao is just really nice
 
AntonioLao's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 5,274
Thanks Given: 714
Thanked 121x in 119 Posts
Join Date: Nov 2003
Rep Power: 73
   
Re: math after 30000 years - 04-08-2008, 02:26 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by Profpat
complex Solomon's Knot
http://mathworld.wolfram.com/SolomonsSealKnot.html
This looks like a 5-pointed star or http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vitruvian_Man


Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to AntonioLao For This Useful Post:
Profpat (04-08-2008)
Re: math after 30000 years
Old
  (#12 (permalink))
Grandmaster
Profpat is a splendid one to beholdProfpat is a splendid one to beholdProfpat is a splendid one to beholdProfpat is a splendid one to beholdProfpat is a splendid one to behold
 
Profpat's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 3,165
Thanks Given: 319
Thanked 528x in 482 Posts
Join Date: May 2007
Rep Power: 46
   
Re: math after 30000 years - 04-08-2008, 02:29 PM

That 5 pointed star is made up of only one line. Not to substantial but great to look at.
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Profpat For This Useful Post:
AntonioLao (04-08-2008)
Re: math after 30000 years
Old
  (#13 (permalink))
Raider of the lost time
AntonioLao is just really niceAntonioLao is just really nice
 
AntonioLao's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 5,274
Thanks Given: 714
Thanked 121x in 119 Posts
Join Date: Nov 2003
Rep Power: 73
   
Re: math after 30000 years - 04-08-2008, 02:32 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by Profpat
great to look at
If we start from a point along the link, eventually we arrived at the same point.


Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Re: math after 30000 years
Old
  (#14 (permalink))
Grandmaster
Profpat is a splendid one to beholdProfpat is a splendid one to beholdProfpat is a splendid one to beholdProfpat is a splendid one to beholdProfpat is a splendid one to behold
 
Profpat's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 3,165
Thanks Given: 319
Thanked 528x in 482 Posts
Join Date: May 2007
Rep Power: 46
   
Re: math after 30000 years - 04-08-2008, 02:35 PM

I going have to study these forms a bit more, including DaVinci's Man.
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Profpat For This Useful Post:
AntonioLao (04-08-2008)
Re: math after 30000 years
Old
  (#15 (permalink))
Raider of the lost time
AntonioLao is just really niceAntonioLao is just really nice
 
AntonioLao's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 5,274
Thanks Given: 714
Thanked 121x in 119 Posts
Join Date: Nov 2003
Rep Power: 73
   
Re: math after 30000 years - 04-08-2008, 02:39 PM

Be sure not to be distracted by the background of quantum vacuum. It only exists in the mind.


Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Re: math after 30000 years
Old
  (#16 (permalink))
Grandmaster
Profpat is a splendid one to beholdProfpat is a splendid one to beholdProfpat is a splendid one to beholdProfpat is a splendid one to beholdProfpat is a splendid one to behold
 
Profpat's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 3,165
Thanks Given: 319
Thanked 528x in 482 Posts
Join Date: May 2007
Rep Power: 46
   
Re: math after 30000 years - 04-08-2008, 02:41 PM

Wouldn't the background of a vacuum be nothing?
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Re: math after 30000 years
Old
  (#17 (permalink))
Raider of the lost time
AntonioLao is just really niceAntonioLao is just really nice
 
AntonioLao's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 5,274
Thanks Given: 714
Thanked 121x in 119 Posts
Join Date: Nov 2003
Rep Power: 73
   
Re: math after 30000 years - 04-09-2008, 11:52 AM

Quote:
Originally Posted by Profpat
Wouldn't the background of a vacuum be nothing?
The background of quantum vacuum is a square of pure energy. Pure energy and spacetime quanta are equivalent. Both are dynamic systems of equilibrium.


Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Re: math after 30000 years
Old
  (#18 (permalink))
Grandmaster
Profpat is a splendid one to beholdProfpat is a splendid one to beholdProfpat is a splendid one to beholdProfpat is a splendid one to beholdProfpat is a splendid one to behold
 
Profpat's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 3,165
Thanks Given: 319
Thanked 528x in 482 Posts
Join Date: May 2007
Rep Power: 46
   
Re: math after 30000 years - 04-09-2008, 01:07 PM

I didn't know that I learned something new today.
Thanks.
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Re: math after 30000 years
Old
  (#19 (permalink))
Raider of the lost time
AntonioLao is just really niceAntonioLao is just really nice
 
AntonioLao's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 5,274
Thanks Given: 714
Thanked 121x in 119 Posts
Join Date: Nov 2003
Rep Power: 73
   
Re: math after 30000 years - 04-09-2008, 01:41 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by Profpat
I learned something new
That there is no such thing as 'nothing'? Please recall that quantum mechanics already proved that vacuum is not empty but full of virtual elementary particles and general relativity proved that spacetime is a dynamical system that dictates the movement of both matter and energy. These suggest that the quantum spacetime can be the square of energy which would include both matter, antimatter, and dark matter, energy and dark energy.


Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Re: math after 30000 years
Old
  (#20 (permalink))
Grandmaster
Profpat is a splendid one to beholdProfpat is a splendid one to beholdProfpat is a splendid one to beholdProfpat is a splendid one to beholdProfpat is a splendid one to behold
 
Profpat's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 3,165
Thanks Given: 319
Thanked 528x in 482 Posts
Join Date: May 2007
Rep Power: 46
   
Re: math after 30000 years - 04-09-2008, 01:56 PM

What about the void or oblivion?
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0
vBulletin Skin developed by: vBStyles.com