[Profpat]

If I could write a bestseller I guess I wouldn't need Harvards or Fords stupid money. OK where's the loophole to that? Oh ya writing a bestseller. But than again LOVE STORY and BRIDGES OF MADISON COUNTY were written by profeesors. I just won't write about accounting or physics or TOE but love and romance.

[AntonioLao]

Originally Posted by Profpat I just won't write about accounting or physics or TOE but love and romance

It might be easier said than done but the trick is to mix them up. You could write about the romance of the galaxy with the supernova or the escape artists of neutrinos catch me if you can or the one way direction street of the black holes highways, the sexual heats of the stars, etc.

[Profpat]

Oh thats good Antonio. It seems like you have the imagination and concept to write a best seller. Accountants can handle concepts but not too much imagination, unless we are trying to " Cook the Books" I'm not to sure about writing books however.

[AntonioLao]

cooking books only gives a lot of fibers in your diet which help bowel movements. For writing books, first you need a gullible publisher who will publish anything you wrote. If you have a lot of money you can be your own publisher.

[Profpat]

Hi Antonio I'm glad you're back, I have a new thought for you.

Given that time slows if you are in a black hole or approaching the speed of light.

And given that both gravity and light follow the inverse square laws.

and finally given Einsteins thought experiment of an elevator , comparing acceleration to gravity.

Can light and gravity be viewed as complementary opposites?

[AntonioLao]

Originally Posted by Profpat Can light and gravity be viewed as complementary opposites?

They are since light always moves outward while gravity always moves inward.

[Profpat]

Originally Posted by AntonioLao They are since light always moves outward while gravity always moves inward.

Good now can we take it a step farther and say that gravity is the attractive force and light is the repulsive force being repeled by gravity i.e. ( the big bang ) and Hawkings black hole radiation and quasers?

[AntonioLao]

Originally Posted by Profpat Hawkings black hole radiation and quasers

Hawking radiation http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hawking_radiation solved BB entropy but not the naked singularity. The power sources of quasars remain unknown. Some theorists suggested them as the collisions of galaxies. On the other hand, quasars are the farthest objects ever detected therefore they are also the oldest.

[Profpat]

Originally Posted by AntonioLao Hawking radiation http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hawking_radiation solved BB entropy but not the naked singularity. The power sources of quasars remain unknown. Some theorists suggested them as the collisions of galaxies. On the other hand, quasars are the farthest objects ever detected therefore they are also the oldest.

OK but given everything was repelled, I guess, from that initial big bang, could it be that gravity is the attractive force and light is the complementary repulsive force?

[AntonioLao]

Originally Posted by Profpat could it be that gravity is the attractive force and light is the complementary repulsive force?

This makes a lot of physical sense, I agree. However, the mystery is 95% of gravity mass cannot be accounted. Cosmology needs a good physical accountant to find the missing decimal digits.