ToeQuest

We're going on a TOE Quest!


Register

Reply

Raider of the lost time

AntonioLao's Avatar

Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 6,036
Blog Entries: 6
86 AntonioLao is a splendid one to beholdAntonioLao is a splendid one to beholdAntonioLao is a splendid one to beholdAntonioLao is a splendid one to behold
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Quote  
04-16-2008, 01:13 PM
mean of infinity

The geometric mean (g) of a set of n positive data points of a given observable is the nth root of their product. But for the arithmetic mean (a), it is the sum divided by n. The first mean uses the unary operator of root extracting and the binary operator of multiplication. The second mean uses the binary operators of both addition and division.

If all the data points are all unity then the product of n unity is still unity and the nth root of unity is also unity. On the other hand, the sum of n unity is n and n divided by n is simply unity. However, if the order of operations is reversed: extract root first then multiply, divide then add as n tends to infinity then these reversed processes can give different means. For unity data points, the answer is the same for finding the geometric mean but for the arithmetic mean the answer is zero if and only if unity divided by infinity is defined as the value of zero. Furthermore, it can be defined that any number greater than zero but less than infinity where and when divided by infinity would still give zero. Therefore, the arithmetic mean of infinity is zero if and only if division is done before addition as presumed by the principle of superposition for all intensive variables. Moreover, the nth root of any number greater than zero but less than unity as occurs in the theory of probability gives an answer that approaches unity while their product approaches zero. Therefore, only the geometric means can satisfy the law of probability for both dependence and independence events of reality.
__________________
Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²
Reply With Quote
AntonioLao is offlineReport Post
Grandmaster

Profpat's Avatar

Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 3,778
61 Profpat has a brilliant futureProfpat has a brilliant futureProfpat has a brilliant futureProfpat has a brilliant futureProfpat has a brilliant futureProfpat has a brilliant futureProfpat has a brilliant future
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Quote  
04-16-2008, 01:36 PM
Re: mean of infinity

Let me see if I understand what you posted Antonio.
To sum it up, Unity is One and Infinity is Zero? And that brings us back to our binary duo 0/1.
Reply With Quote
Profpat is online nowReport Post
Raider of the lost time

AntonioLao's Avatar

Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 6,036
Blog Entries: 6
86 AntonioLao is a splendid one to beholdAntonioLao is a splendid one to beholdAntonioLao is a splendid one to beholdAntonioLao is a splendid one to behold
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Quote  
04-16-2008, 03:09 PM
Re: mean of infinity

The geometric mean of infinity is one but the arithmetic mean of infinity is zero. However, only the geometric mean can describe independence events of probability theory for the external reality of the physical world.
__________________
Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²
Reply With Quote
AntonioLao is offlineReport Post
Grandmaster

Profpat's Avatar

Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 3,778
61 Profpat has a brilliant futureProfpat has a brilliant futureProfpat has a brilliant futureProfpat has a brilliant futureProfpat has a brilliant futureProfpat has a brilliant futureProfpat has a brilliant future
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Quote  
04-16-2008, 04:32 PM
Re: mean of infinity

OK This may make sense Infinity is 1 and 0.

And what is unity? 1?

Last edited by Profpat; 04-16-2008 at 04:33 PM. Reason: added a sentence
Reply With Quote
Profpat is online nowReport Post
Raider of the lost time

AntonioLao's Avatar

Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 6,036
Blog Entries: 6
86 AntonioLao is a splendid one to beholdAntonioLao is a splendid one to beholdAntonioLao is a splendid one to beholdAntonioLao is a splendid one to behold
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Quote  
04-16-2008, 04:38 PM
Re: mean of infinity

3 in 1 or 2 in 1 but not 4 in 1 since 3 and 2 are primes.
__________________
Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²
Reply With Quote
AntonioLao is offlineReport Post
Reply

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:36 PM. Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0 VBulletin Skin by ForumMonkeys.