Welcome to the ToeQuest.
Results 1 to 5 of 5
  1. #1
    Raider of the lost time
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    11,778
    Blog Entries
    10
    Thanks Given
    1,106
    Thanked 1,472x in 1,192 Posts
    Rep Power
    158

    mean of infinity

    The geometric mean (g) of a set of n positive data points of a given observable is the nth root of their product. But for the arithmetic mean (a), it is the sum divided by n. The first mean uses the unary operator of root extracting and the binary operator of multiplication. The second mean uses the binary operators of both addition and division.

    If all the data points are all unity then the product of n unity is still unity and the nth root of unity is also unity. On the other hand, the sum of n unity is n and n divided by n is simply unity. However, if the order of operations is reversed: extract root first then multiply, divide then add as n tends to infinity then these reversed processes can give different means. For unity data points, the answer is the same for finding the geometric mean but for the arithmetic mean the answer is zero if and only if unity divided by infinity is defined as the value of zero. Furthermore, it can be defined that any number greater than zero but less than infinity where and when divided by infinity would still give zero. Therefore, the arithmetic mean of infinity is zero if and only if division is done before addition as presumed by the principle of superposition for all intensive variables. Moreover, the nth root of any number greater than zero but less than unity as occurs in the theory of probability gives an answer that approaches unity while their product approaches zero. Therefore, only the geometric means can satisfy the law of probability for both dependence and independence events of reality.
    Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²

  2. #2
    Grandmaster
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    6,657
    Thanks Given
    836
    Thanked 1,049x in 746 Posts
    Rep Power
    105

    Re: mean of infinity

    Let me see if I understand what you posted Antonio.
    To sum it up, Unity is One and Infinity is Zero? And that brings us back to our binary duo 0/1.

  3. #3
    Raider of the lost time
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    11,778
    Blog Entries
    10
    Thanks Given
    1,106
    Thanked 1,472x in 1,192 Posts
    Rep Power
    158

    Re: mean of infinity

    The geometric mean of infinity is one but the arithmetic mean of infinity is zero. However, only the geometric mean can describe independence events of probability theory for the external reality of the physical world.
    Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²

  4. #4
    Grandmaster
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    6,657
    Thanks Given
    836
    Thanked 1,049x in 746 Posts
    Rep Power
    105

    Re: mean of infinity

    OK This may make sense Infinity is 1 and 0.

    And what is unity? 1?
    Last edited by Profpat; 04-16-2008 at 03:33 PM. Reason: added a sentence

  5. #5
    Raider of the lost time
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    11,778
    Blog Entries
    10
    Thanks Given
    1,106
    Thanked 1,472x in 1,192 Posts
    Rep Power
    158

    Re: mean of infinity

    3 in 1 or 2 in 1 but not 4 in 1 since 3 and 2 are primes.
    Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²

 

 

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Back to top