Theory of Everything  

  
Go Back   Theory of Everything > Tools > Mathematics
Reload this Page imago
Register Website Toe Club Your Blog Arcade

Reply
Page 4 of 7 < 123 4 567 >
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Re: imago
Old
  (#31 (permalink))
Moderator
mkirkpatrick is a splendid one to beholdmkirkpatrick is a splendid one to beholdmkirkpatrick is a splendid one to beholdmkirkpatrick is a splendid one to beholdmkirkpatrick is a splendid one to behold
 
mkirkpatrick's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 7,477
Thanks Given: 369
Thanked 791x in 727 Posts
Join Date: Aug 2005
Rep Power: 98
   
Smile Re: imago - 06-01-2008, 05:26 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by AntonioLao View Post
Might as well since smoke screen only hides the truth.

The truth will eventually emerge from behind any screen.




regards michael.

Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
reveal herself?
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to mkirkpatrick For This Useful Post:
AntonioLao (06-08-2008)
Re: imago
Old
  (#32 (permalink))
Raider of the lost time
AntonioLao is a name known to allAntonioLao is a name known to allAntonioLao is a name known to all
 
AntonioLao's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 5,613
Thanks Given: 790
Thanked 180x in 174 Posts
Join Date: Nov 2003
Rep Power: 80
   
Re: imago - 06-08-2008, 03:01 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by mkirkpatrick
behind any screen
What about behind a screen of infinite mass and absolute opacity?

Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(t)·r(t)=c²
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Re: imago
Old
  (#33 (permalink))
Grandmaster
Profpat has much to be proud ofProfpat has much to be proud ofProfpat has much to be proud ofProfpat has much to be proud ofProfpat has much to be proud ofProfpat has much to be proud of
 
Profpat's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 3,341
Thanks Given: 359
Thanked 597x in 533 Posts
Join Date: May 2007
Rep Power: 51
   
Re: imago - 06-08-2008, 03:32 PM
The only way I know you could have infinite mass is to have mass travel at light speed.
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Profpat For This Useful Post:
AntonioLao (06-08-2008)
Re: imago
Old
  (#34 (permalink))
Raider of the lost time
AntonioLao is a name known to allAntonioLao is a name known to allAntonioLao is a name known to all
 
AntonioLao's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 5,613
Thanks Given: 790
Thanked 180x in 174 Posts
Join Date: Nov 2003
Rep Power: 80
   
Re: imago - 06-08-2008, 03:35 PM
that's why photon mass is zero.

Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(t)·r(t)=c²
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Re: imago
Old
  (#35 (permalink))
Grandmaster
Profpat has much to be proud ofProfpat has much to be proud ofProfpat has much to be proud ofProfpat has much to be proud ofProfpat has much to be proud ofProfpat has much to be proud of
 
Profpat's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 3,341
Thanks Given: 359
Thanked 597x in 533 Posts
Join Date: May 2007
Rep Power: 51
   
Re: imago - 06-08-2008, 03:39 PM
I guess the neutrino has mass and it travels at near light speed, shouldn't it be pretty massive at that speed?
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Re: imago
Old
  (#36 (permalink))
Raider of the lost time
AntonioLao is a name known to allAntonioLao is a name known to allAntonioLao is a name known to all
 
AntonioLao's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 5,613
Thanks Given: 790
Thanked 180x in 174 Posts
Join Date: Nov 2003
Rep Power: 80
   
Re: imago - 06-08-2008, 03:44 PM
That's a good question. I'm still not completely understood the mass of neutrino and its oscillation between e, mu, and tau kind even though it can explain the missing solar neutrinos.

Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(t)·r(t)=c²
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Re: imago
Old
  (#37 (permalink))
Grandmaster
Profpat has much to be proud ofProfpat has much to be proud ofProfpat has much to be proud ofProfpat has much to be proud ofProfpat has much to be proud ofProfpat has much to be proud of
 
Profpat's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 3,341
Thanks Given: 359
Thanked 597x in 533 Posts
Join Date: May 2007
Rep Power: 51
   
Re: imago - 06-08-2008, 03:46 PM
And I guess it plays havoc with the standard model, since they thought it was massless. Back to the drawing boards gentlemen.
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Re: imago
Old
  (#38 (permalink))
Raider of the lost time
AntonioLao is a name known to allAntonioLao is a name known to allAntonioLao is a name known to all
 
AntonioLao's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 5,613
Thanks Given: 790
Thanked 180x in 174 Posts
Join Date: Nov 2003
Rep Power: 80
   
Re: imago - 06-08-2008, 03:50 PM
Now, they believe that standard model of elementary particles can be saved by conjuring the supermassive scalar Higgs boson.

Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(t)·r(t)=c²
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to AntonioLao For This Useful Post:
Profpat (06-08-2008)
Re: imago
Old
  (#39 (permalink))
Grandmaster
Profpat has much to be proud ofProfpat has much to be proud ofProfpat has much to be proud ofProfpat has much to be proud ofProfpat has much to be proud ofProfpat has much to be proud of
 
Profpat's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 3,341
Thanks Given: 359
Thanked 597x in 533 Posts
Join Date: May 2007
Rep Power: 51
   
Re: imago - 06-08-2008, 03:56 PM
I really have problem with that proposed God Particle of theirs. Maybe the LHC will shead some light on the matter.
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Re: imago
Old
  (#40 (permalink))
Raider of the lost time
AntonioLao is a name known to allAntonioLao is a name known to allAntonioLao is a name known to all
 
AntonioLao's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 5,613
Thanks Given: 790
Thanked 180x in 174 Posts
Join Date: Nov 2003
Rep Power: 80
   
Re: imago - 06-08-2008, 03:59 PM
Can't hold my breath since CERN is foot dragging to back online on the LHC.

Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(t)·r(t)=c²
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Reply
Page 4 of 7 < 123 4 567 >

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes
Linear Mode Linear Mode

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0
vBulletin Skin developed by: vBStyles.com

Buy Anything On eBay | Mortgage Calculator | Car Finance | Free MP3 Download | Personal Loans
Contact Us - Theory of Everything - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top