Welcome to the ToeQuest.
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 13
  1. #1
    Raider of the lost time
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    11,778
    Blog Entries
    10
    Thanks Given
    1,106
    Thanked 1,472x in 1,192 Posts
    Rep Power
    158

    symmetric tensor

    Einstein’s symmetric metric tensor (g) of general relativity is a 4 by 4 matrix with 16 real elements. In the special case where the trace (sum of diagonal elements) is 2, its sum of squares of elements describes a general invariance for a linear Lorentz transformation. This is simply the spacetime interval ds known as the proper time for all inertial systems that are relatively motionless or uniformly moving with respect to each other. For non-inertial systems (e.g. accelerated systems) the metric tensor must contains at the least 1 nonzero off-diagonal element but for linear symmetry, the trace vanishes while for nonlinear symmetry the trace must remains nonzero. Both conditions of nonzero elements and nonlinearity can be satisfied by using singular symmetric Hadamard matrices.

    The key advantage of using the latter is their increasing eigenvalues of their power factors. It is noted that g=I, where I is the identity matrix. g=g, g=I, g=g, g=g, and g=I. Clearly, these indicate that the nonlinear odd power transformations of g is an invariance but the even power transformations reduce them back to the identity matrix. All these describe a static, stationary, and no growth universe. On the other hand, the power factors of a Hadamard matrix, H are H=4H, H=16H, H=64H, H=256H, H=4096H, and H=16384H. All these accelerated exponential growths imply the usefulness of Hadamard matrices for describing the accelerated expansion of spacetime and also simultaneously satisfy the missing mass principle using the general invariance of Hadamard matrices representing a no background spacetime quantum.
    Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²

  2. #2
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Posts
    11,621
    Blog Entries
    5
    Thanks Given
    295
    Thanked 896x in 724 Posts
    Rep Power
    154

    Smile Re: symmetric tensor

    I just knew that HMs were in there somewhere,they are surely the building block
    that will support fusion.




    regards michael.
    Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
    reveal herself?

  3. #3
    Raider of the lost time
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    11,778
    Blog Entries
    10
    Thanks Given
    1,106
    Thanked 1,472x in 1,192 Posts
    Rep Power
    158

    Re: symmetric tensor

    Quote Originally Posted by mkirkpatrick
    I just knew that HMs were in there somewhere
    Without HM there would be no quanta of spacetime and no squares of energy. Yesterday, I was trying to use HM to prove Riemann Hypothesis for the distribution of prime numbers along the positive real whole numbers line.
    Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²

  4. #4
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Posts
    11,621
    Blog Entries
    5
    Thanks Given
    295
    Thanked 896x in 724 Posts
    Rep Power
    154

    Smile Re: symmetric tensor

    Quote Originally Posted by AntonioLao View Post
    Without HM there would be no quanta of spacetime and no squares of energy. Yesterday, I was trying to use HM to prove Riemann Hypothesis for the distribution of prime numbers along the positive real whole numbers line.

    And did you?It seems that without HM nothing can occur?




    regards michael.
    Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
    reveal herself?

  5. #5
    Raider of the lost time
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    11,778
    Blog Entries
    10
    Thanks Given
    1,106
    Thanked 1,472x in 1,192 Posts
    Rep Power
    158

    Re: symmetric tensor

    Quote Originally Posted by mkirkpatrick
    without HM nothing can occur
    In binary number system 11, 111, 11111, and 1111111 are primes. By inductive reasoning the largest prime is an infinite binary number of 1111111111111111...
    Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²

  6. #6
    Grandmaster
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    6,657
    Thanks Given
    836
    Thanked 1,049x in 746 Posts
    Rep Power
    105

    Re: symmetric tensor

    Good thought Antonio, is it possible for a prime number to reach infinity?

  7. #7
    Raider of the lost time
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    11,778
    Blog Entries
    10
    Thanks Given
    1,106
    Thanked 1,472x in 1,192 Posts
    Rep Power
    158

    Re: symmetric tensor

    I can't prove it but infinity itself could be the largest prime 111111111... in binary numbers notation.
    Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²

  8. #8
    Grandmaster
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    6,657
    Thanks Given
    836
    Thanked 1,049x in 746 Posts
    Rep Power
    105

    Re: symmetric tensor

    Is there a " LARGEST " in infinity, since infinity never ends?

  9. #9
    Raider of the lost time
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    11,778
    Blog Entries
    10
    Thanks Given
    1,106
    Thanked 1,472x in 1,192 Posts
    Rep Power
    158

    Re: symmetric tensor

    infinity is the largest but i can't prove it.
    Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²

  10. #10
    Grandmaster
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    6,657
    Thanks Given
    836
    Thanked 1,049x in 746 Posts
    Rep Power
    105

    Re: symmetric tensor

    If you could Antonio, my guess would be, there would be a nice prize for you in Sweden.

 

 
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Back to top