Welcome to the ToeQuest.
Page 1 of 4 1234 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 33
  1. #1
    Raider of the lost time
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    11,778
    Blog Entries
    10
    Thanks Given
    1,106
    Thanked 1,472x in 1,192 Posts
    Rep Power
    158

    smooth operators

    In 1905, Einstein published a paper in the German journal Annalen der Physik, the English title, “On the Electrodynamics of Moving Bodies,” appeared unassuming to the casual science readers of the era. However, this is the paper that is completely self-contained; without references to other scientific papers since it described a new idea as birth of a special theory of relativity. It created a revolution still un-abating to this day.

    This theory frequently made use of operational definitions for physical observables and later known as physical operators. These can be separated into two distinct subdivisions: smooth and quantum, in other words, continuous and discrete. They are deeply connected to the more familiar mathematical operators and given examples in the many branches of mathematics. In arithmetic, there are 4 basic binary operators: +, -, x, and ¸ with unary operators of n-powers and n-roots. In set theory, there are the Ç and È binary operators. In calculus, there are the differential and the integral operators.

    Physical operators are now extensively use in modern physics: quantum field theory (QFT), quantum mechanics (QM), and general relativity (GR). However, a truly smooth physical operator that can operate on all common elements of QFT, QM, and GR still does not exist.
    Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²

  2. #2
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Posts
    11,621
    Blog Entries
    5
    Thanks Given
    295
    Thanked 896x in 724 Posts
    Rep Power
    154

    Smile Re: smooth operators

    Uncle Albert was the smoothest operator there ever was!




    regards michael.
    Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
    reveal herself?

  3. #3
    Grandmaster
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    6,657
    Thanks Given
    836
    Thanked 1,049x in 746 Posts
    Rep Power
    105

    Re: smooth operators



    Here is a smooth operator who was Newtons assistant.

  4. #4
    Grandmaster
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    11,904
    Blog Entries
    28
    Thanks Given
    1,782
    Thanked 3,989x in 2,767 Posts
    Rep Power
    181

    Awards Showcase

    Re: smooth operators

    Let there be no barriers, Prof, to your investigation of the 'Three Theory', as you leapfrog all obstacles, even those with the two-and-only. Hope you have a picture of a condom with you when you picture these types of photos.

  5. #5
    Raider of the lost time
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    11,778
    Blog Entries
    10
    Thanks Given
    1,106
    Thanked 1,472x in 1,192 Posts
    Rep Power
    158

    Re: smooth operators

    what we need is a reanimator to recover all past geniuses: Newton, Maxwell, and Einstein. Wheeler would also be a good candidate since he died last week.
    Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²

  6. #6
    Grandmaster
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    6,657
    Thanks Given
    836
    Thanked 1,049x in 746 Posts
    Rep Power
    105

    Re: smooth operators

    Quote Originally Posted by AntonioLao View Post
    what we need is a reanimator to recover all past geniuses: Newton, Maxwell, and Einstein. Wheeler would also be a good candidate since he died last week.

    Naw. Stage is now open for all the new ones, Like Antonio, Michael, Pat on and on......

  7. #7
    Raider of the lost time
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    11,778
    Blog Entries
    10
    Thanks Given
    1,106
    Thanked 1,472x in 1,192 Posts
    Rep Power
    158

    Re: smooth operators

    I'm borrowing all good ideas from this trio of above reproach minds.
    Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²

  8. #8
    Grandmaster
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    6,657
    Thanks Given
    836
    Thanked 1,049x in 746 Posts
    Rep Power
    105

    Re: smooth operators

    Quote Originally Posted by AntonioLao View Post
    I'm borrowing all good ideas from this trio of above reproach minds.
    My An Idea was taken from Greene, Gell-Mann, Bohr etc.

    We stand on the shoulders of the giants Antonio.

  9. #9
    Raider of the lost time
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    11,778
    Blog Entries
    10
    Thanks Given
    1,106
    Thanked 1,472x in 1,192 Posts
    Rep Power
    158

    Re: smooth operators

    Maybe we are beginning to step on their TOEs? But dead TOEs feel no pain.
    Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²

  10. #10
    Grandmaster
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    6,657
    Thanks Given
    836
    Thanked 1,049x in 746 Posts
    Rep Power
    105

    Re: smooth operators

    Quote Originally Posted by AntonioLao View Post
    Maybe we are beginning to step on their TOEs? But dead TOEs feel no pain.
    I think Greene and Gell-Mann are still alive so they may say ouch. BTW a copyright is good for 50 years after the Authors death, so NEWTON IS FAIR GAME. THOUGH YOU CAN'T COPYRIGHT OR PATENT AN IDEA.

 

 
Page 1 of 4 1234 LastLast

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Back to top