[PoPpAScience]

Hi Antonio;

I see Gravity as the flow of the fundamental substance, that is being drawn into the cores of all the nuclei that are contained in a given mass.

I imagine Gravity effecting me, to be like a river flowing down stream to an ocean and I am lying in the river facing up stream with my feet against a rock. I am being drawn and pushed upon by the flow of the fundamental substance, the same as if I was in the river.

Up to a few days ago I always thought of Gravity as a "Gravity Well", created by the curvature of space. But I was never comfortable with that. Even though I have stated many times in here and other forums that I felt that Gravity was a product of the other three main forces, it was not till I read Jimbo's "Fluid Energy Theory", that I finally see Gravity as a "Flow of Fundamental Substance" into the the hungry mouth of Mass. The larger the mouth of mass, the larger the flow, thus the larger the effect upon Entities like I.

[sillysally]

I think gravity is the weight of the air. But there is another explanation I thought of in one of your threads I think, something to do with the earth axis and a pushing force. You know when something spins, like toilet water, it's sucked down.

[Mikal]

Originally Posted by mkirkpatrick

prehaps gravity is not explained because of a total mind block and acceptance that it might just be something to do with willed consciousness in action.?



regards michael.

I also believe gravity is something to do with willed consciousness when we begin to utilize introspective consiousness and vision to begin to refine the entirety of the human sensory system...I believe the unification of lower and higher sense becomes willed consciousness and states of gravity are experienced...


Mikal

[AntonioLao]

Originally Posted by vacuum-mechanics

But let us first assumed that there is “something”

I call this "something" as squares of energy. They are describable by the algebra of singular Hadamard square matrices.

Can anyone give a plausible explanation why gravity always acted at a distance. When two masses are in contact, according to Newton's law the gravity is infinite but instead the result is just a combined mass of one object. When we break a piece of bar magnet somehow the pieces cannot be joined back together with the same magnetic polarities.

[Profpat]

Originally Posted by AntonioLao

I call this "something" as squares of energy. They are describable by the algebra of singular Hadamard square matrices.

Can anyone give a plausible explanation why gravity always acted at a distance. When two masses are in contact, according to Newton's law the gravity is infinite but instead the result is just a combined mass of one object. When we break a piece of bar magnet somehow the pieces cannot be joined back together with the same magnetic polarities.

Might not gravity become infinite when all the mass in the entire universe is in One tiny beginning point. Then something has to give. I didn't know that about the bar magnets.

[AntonioLao]

You are describing the structure of a black hole or the big bang singularity.
Their existences remain circumstantial. I discovered the magnetic anomaly by accident when I collided two magnets together continuously then one broke into two pieces which could not be joined back with the same north south polarity.

[Profpat]

Originally Posted by AntonioLao

You are describing the structure of a black hole or the big bang singularity.
Their existences remain circumstantial. I discovered the magnetic anomaly by accident when I collided two magnets together continuously then one broke into two pieces which could not be joined back with the same north south polarity.

You're right that is what I was describing. So when it reaches infinity doesn't something have to give?

Your magnet anomaly did you research that after? Like I said I never knew that, myself.

[AntonioLao]

What gives might be a rip in the spacetime fabric. I dont think this can happen if the number of spacetime charges are equal. They were just distributed with uneven local densities. These lumps were detected with the maps of the CMBR. I looked up textbooks on magnetism and cannot find anyone ever previously mentioned it. I thought it might be related to the ambient temperature.

[Profpat]

Maybe that big rip would explain spatial inflation. My thought is that quasars come from black holes that can't hold anymore.

Maybe you should do an internet search and if you can't find anything maybe you have discovered something very important by accident.

[AntonioLao]

there are debates among astronomers and cosmologists whether quasars are colliding galaxies with their central black holes. I did search in the internet but came up empty. Now, I'm beginning to think this is a new isolated discovery not even Maxwell or Faraday had knew about.