[AntonioLao]

Could we say that the soul is pure energy? That it has no mass?

[Mikal]

Antonio....my thoughts on the soul exactly....possibly you could help me understand the moment I felt my soul...others with me said..."you are shining"....your face is shining...what or how could that be explained energy wise...????


Mikal

[AntonioLao]

If it is shining then the Sun must be out. nickname for the Sun is Sol an ancient Roman god personifying the Sun. Electromagnetic radiation is the same as radiant energy. Mass is also energy but it does not radiate.

[Mikal]

Antonio....so this would be radiant energy! Is radiant energy like of the nature of atomic or plutonium??? I could be making no sense here at all cause I am just trying to understand this from a scientific perspective ...if you will..


Mikal

[AntonioLao]

Originally Posted by Mikal

like of the nature of atomic or plutonium???

Natural (Uranium-23 and artificial (Plutonium) radioactivities both give 3 types of particle radiations alpha beta and gamma. Alpha are energetic helium nuclei, beta are energetic free electrons, and gamma are energetic photon. But only gamma are electromagnetic radiation. The first two are not electromagnetic in nature but simply particles in very excited quantum states of free existence with very high kinetic energy. The bad news is that all 3 are very destructive to living things.

[Mikal]

Antonio....thanks for the explanation...understand this but know for sure nothing destructive happened to me as a living, biological organism if we will...smiles. In fact since this occurrance it seems to have strengthened my immune system...have not had any illness, not even cold, flu or infection even though I work openly in the public domain. I guess I am just trying to understand the scientific understanding of us as enegy..so thanks again and gives me new info...


Mikal

[vacuum-mechanics]

Dear AntonioLao and friends,

Originally Posted by AntonioLao

I call this "something" as squares of energy. They are describable by the algebra of singular Hadamard square matrices.

Can anyone give a plausible explanation why gravity always acted at a distance. When two masses are in contact, according to Newton's law the gravity is infinite but instead the result is just a combined mass of one object. When we break a piece of bar magnet somehow the pieces cannot be joined back together with the same magnetic polarities.

---It is interesting! Unfortunately I am not familiar with “Hadamard square matrices”, would you please explain how it should be “something” mentioned?

---May be the infinite gravity is because of Newton mathematical formula is a “simplify” one! Let us see what will happen in a simple realistic case for the attraction between two equal sphere masses with some radius’ length, but have constant density. When both spheres contact each other, i.e. the distance between them is twice the radius, and then we will get maximum gravity.

Now assume that we can move both spheres “immerge” in each other while they still have the same shape and density. In this situation their mutual attraction forces will gradually decrease, and when both spheres’ center coincides, then the attraction force is zero! The reason is because the gravity within each sphere will gradually decrease when approaching its center and the gravity is zero at the center.

To make it easy (?) for visualize the decreasing of gravity in sphere. It is the something like the decreasing of your weight when you are climbing down in a tunnel which digs toward the earth’s center. Your weight is maximum on earth surface and will decreasing when approaching center of the earth, and will be zero or weightless at the earth’s center!

Sincerely,
Nimit

[AntonioLao]

Newton's law of gravitation made the assumption of attractions between point-mass particles. So, if we tunnel into the center of the earth the gravity there will be close to zero.

[Spiral Path]

Every coherent mass in the universe, from the smallest dust particle to the largest star, is in constant motion, i.e. has directional momentum, and should therefore be considered a vector. These vectors interact with each other according to the laws of rotational dynamics by following multiple superimposed spiral paths. The vector analysis resultant (commonly called G) of these interacting forces, done on any solid surface, will reveal a constant change of irregular magnitude and shifting direction in the overall momentum at this particular spot. Combined with Newton's famous formula, it represents the universal phenomenon of "gravity" as we know it. This variable SG ("shifting gyration") gravity in turn causes most of the geological events we record on the Earth's surface as well as explains most of the phenomena we observe in the heavens. It also leads us to assume that the Universe is self-regulating by constantly recycling and interchanging its matter and energy content and therefore presumably everlasting - whatever that entails.

Spiral Path

[Mikal]

Originally Posted by Spiral Path

Every coherent mass in the universe, from the smallest dust particle to the largest star, is in constant motion, i.e. has directional momentum, and should therefore be considered a vector. These vectors interact with each other according to the laws of rotational dynamics by following multiple superimposed spiral paths. The vector analysis resultant (commonly called G) of these interacting forces, done on any solid surface, will reveal a constant change of irregular magnitude and shifting direction in the overall momentum at this particular spot. Combined with Newton's famous formula, it represents the universal phenomenon of "gravity" as we know it. This variable SG ("shifting gyration") gravity in turn causes most of the geological events we record on the Earth's surface as well as explains most of the phenomena we observe in the heavens. It also leads us to assume that the Universe is self-regulating by constantly recycling and interchanging its matter and energy content and therefore presumably everlasting - whatever that entails.

Spiral Path

Spiral Path...because of my experience with my own consciousness and experiences with proprioception I kind of believe that the phenomena of "gravity" is about the sensory system in its entirety. Is it possible that our senses are a vector possible to follow these vector paths you speak of?? Is it possible for a reconnect to vectors of sense that this could be shifting gyrations??? Could be far off base here but if you do not ask you will never know....smiles


Mikal