[Fredrick]

Originally Posted by AntonioLao Thanks. What I can provide might be Fermat's last algorithm on primes factorization. For the calculation check out on the TI-84 up to 8-digit numbers. I would like to test the same in a supercomuter and maybe compare to others. As a bonus, I can also throw in the algorithmic proof for Goldbach conjecture. Maybe you and me can share the millennium prize when this algorithm is accepted as the correct one for also proving Riemann Hypothesis.

Thank you, Antonio, for sharing the Million Dollar Prize with me with the entire ToeQuest team as our witness.

I accept your offer at a minimum of 25%, preferably 50% of the prize.

And you, do you accept under same conditions?

P.S. What do you think of Louis de Branges de Bourcia (University of Purdue)'s attempt of solving the Hypothesis? http://www.math.purdue.edu/~branges/site

[AntonioLao]

Originally Posted by Fredrick What do you think of Louis de Branges de Bourcia

Never heard of him. Need more information, please. Thanks for the link. I just emailed him.

I accept your offer at a minimum of 25%, preferably 50% of the prize.

We can talk money later. First we have to get it submitted and approved. The process might take couple of years.

[Fredrick]

Originally Posted by AntonioLao We can talk money later. First we have to get it submitted and approved. The process might take couple of years.

Deal or no deal, Antonio!

[AntonioLao]

Still not clear what is it you are willing to experdiate the submission process? By the way, have you had any previous experience in submitting a paper to a prestigious journal? If you can get it published then you get 50% of the prize.

[Fredrick]

Originally Posted by AntonioLao Still not clear what is it you are willing to experdiate the submission process? By the way, have you had any previous experience in submitting a paper to a prestigious journal? If you can get it published then you get 50% of the prize.

As far as I know, if I can get it published, I'd get 100% of the prize.

[AntonioLao]

In that case I have to do it myself. I used to have a lawyer who wanted it all and end up with nothing since he lose the case.

[Fredrick]

Originally Posted by AntonioLao In that case I have to do it myself. I used to have a lawyer who wanted it all and ended up with nothing since he lost the case.

That is good information to know, Antonio,

[Fredrick]

What I can give you (for free) is the fact of the existence of another delivery applicable next to the Riemann Hypothesis, and also true.

More information after we strike a deal in this thread.

[AntonioLao]

Fredrick,

But I'm not interested in Riemann Hypothesis. Maybe Fermat's lost algorithm. But my algorithm only takes up maybe 10 lines of computer program coding which I did in TI-84 and I'm claiming that it can find prime factors for an 8-digit composite number in a fraction of a second or less. I think what I really need is a patent lawyer and file a patent application as quickly as I can.

[analog]

Originally Posted by AntonioLao I think what I really need is a patent lawyer and file a patent application as quickly as I can.

Hello Antonio,

I see from your profile that you live in the U.S.; therefore I would ask if you've ever heard of the 'first to invent' clause. If not, It's merely a clause in patent laws that allows intellectual property to be protected by means of documentation and records before applying for a patent. Our patent laws don't work on 'first to file' like most countries, but there are rules that must be followed.

A patent is still the way to go, but this process has its advantages if someone is merely an inventor and sells their ideas without manufacturing them themselves. In which case, a large firm will generally redo any preexisting patent due to their ability to get a more reputable patent lawyer; thus a stronger claim. This saves a lot of unneccesary expenses on patents in such a situation.

This is also the method used by many big corporations in their R&D departments. It actually supercedes a patent as long as it's kept up correctly. They refer to them as lab books (i.e. notebook with permenantly bound numbered pages) and there's a certain way they're maintained.

I would still suggest that you keep a lab book while you work towards a patent, as it will stand up in court as proof of your intellectual property if properly maintained.

Here's a couple of links I just pulled up but haven't looked at them real well, but they should give you an idea of how things work:
http://inventors.about.com/od/firstt...nvent_Rule.htm
http://www.idearights.com/firsttoinvt.htm

I also have some books on the subject of how to properly keep records and lab books, so let me know if I can be of any further assistance.

Regards,

Tim