ToeQuest

We're going on a TOE Quest!


Register

Reply

Raider of the lost time

AntonioLao's Avatar

Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 6,036
Blog Entries: 6
86 AntonioLao is a splendid one to beholdAntonioLao is a splendid one to beholdAntonioLao is a splendid one to beholdAntonioLao is a splendid one to behold
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Quote  
07-14-2008, 05:45 PM
Fundamental theorem of arithmetic

It was Euclid in 300 B.C. who first attempted a theory of numbers, the study of the properties of whole numbers and ratios of whole numbers. This theory can only be found in Books VII, VIII, and IX of his Elements. In them Euclid represents numbers as line segments and the product of two numbers as rectangle. These geometric representations were supported by verbal arguments and proofs in contrast to modern usage of symbols. He did prove the non-existence of a largest prime number by reduction ad absurdum that is based on the false assumption that there is a largest prime.

To this day, the theory of prime numbers remains unsolved even though many conjectures exist. The one listed in the Millennium Problems is known as the Riemann Hypothesis with a prize tag of $1 Million for the person or persons proving it correctly. Analogous to Goldbach conjecture that every even whole number greater than 2 is the sum of two primes and even though it is not proved or disproved, the fundamental theorem of arithmetic was proved by basic axioms on whole numbers as from a unique factorization theorem of prime decomposition. Simply stated, it says that every composite number can be decomposed into at least two prime factors. For examples: 4=2x2, 9=3x3, 8=2x2x2, 15=3x5, and 12709189=3559x3571. In the science and technology of modern encryption the larger the prime factors are the more secure the coded signals become. In 1903, Frank Nelson Cole (1861-1926) showed that 2 raised to 67th power minus 1 is a composite number with two prime factors: 193707721 and 16183257287.
__________________
Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²
Reply With Quote
AntonioLao is offlineReport Post
Grandmaster

austintorn@aol.com's Avatar

Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 3,469
Blog Entries: 28
79 austintorn@aol.com has a reputation beyond reputeaustintorn@aol.com has a reputation beyond reputeaustintorn@aol.com has a reputation beyond reputeaustintorn@aol.com has a reputation beyond reputeaustintorn@aol.com has a reputation beyond reputeaustintorn@aol.com has a reputation beyond reputeaustintorn@aol.com has a reputation beyond reputeaustintorn@aol.com has a reputation beyond reputeaustintorn@aol.com has a reputation beyond reputeaustintorn@aol.com has a reputation beyond reputeaustintorn@aol.com has a reputation beyond repute

Awards Showcase
Member of the Quarter 
Total Awards: 1

Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Quote  
07-14-2008, 05:57 PM
Re: Fundamental theorem of arithmetic

Remember the guy who spent years on figuring pi to thousands of digits by using only a pencil, but then had to start all over because he make a mistake in position 712?

Also, it is said that a quantum computer could unencrypt large primes and find the factors instantly.

Also, I think numbers started out as having n number of line segments in each.
Reply With Quote
austintorn@aol.com is offlineReport Post
Raider of the lost time

AntonioLao's Avatar

Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 6,036
Blog Entries: 6
86 AntonioLao is a splendid one to beholdAntonioLao is a splendid one to beholdAntonioLao is a splendid one to beholdAntonioLao is a splendid one to behold
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Quote  
07-14-2008, 06:12 PM
Re: Fundamental theorem of arithmetic

what we need to find out is what algorithm these claims are using.
__________________
Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²
Reply With Quote
AntonioLao is offlineReport Post
Moderator

mkirkpatrick's Avatar

Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 7,749
Blog Entries: 4
103 mkirkpatrick has much to be proud ofmkirkpatrick has much to be proud ofmkirkpatrick has much to be proud ofmkirkpatrick has much to be proud ofmkirkpatrick has much to be proud ofmkirkpatrick has much to be proud of
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Quote  
07-14-2008, 06:54 PM
Smile Re: Fundamental theorem of arithmetic

When you add it all up my friend,what does it REALLY amount to!




regards michael.
__________________
Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
reveal herself?
Reply With Quote
mkirkpatrick is offlineReport Post
Raider of the lost time

AntonioLao's Avatar

Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 6,036
Blog Entries: 6
86 AntonioLao is a splendid one to beholdAntonioLao is a splendid one to beholdAntonioLao is a splendid one to beholdAntonioLao is a splendid one to behold
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Quote  
07-14-2008, 07:01 PM
Re: Fundamental theorem of arithmetic

nothing short of infinity. By the way, the uses of prime factors are in enscription such as the security of all internet access.
__________________
Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²
Reply With Quote
AntonioLao is offlineReport Post
Moderator

mkirkpatrick's Avatar

Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 7,749
Blog Entries: 4
103 mkirkpatrick has much to be proud ofmkirkpatrick has much to be proud ofmkirkpatrick has much to be proud ofmkirkpatrick has much to be proud ofmkirkpatrick has much to be proud ofmkirkpatrick has much to be proud of
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Quote  
07-14-2008, 07:04 PM
Smile Re: Fundamental theorem of arithmetic

Quote:
Originally Posted by AntonioLao View Post
nothing short of infinity. By the way, the uses of prime factors are in enscription such as the security of all internet access.

Anything shorter would not cut the mustard!




regards michael.
__________________
Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
reveal herself?
Reply With Quote
mkirkpatrick is offlineReport Post
Raider of the lost time

AntonioLao's Avatar

Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 6,036
Blog Entries: 6
86 AntonioLao is a splendid one to beholdAntonioLao is a splendid one to beholdAntonioLao is a splendid one to beholdAntonioLao is a splendid one to behold
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Quote  
07-14-2008, 07:07 PM
Re: Fundamental theorem of arithmetic

Or the custard.
__________________
Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²
Reply With Quote
AntonioLao is offlineReport Post
Moderator

mkirkpatrick's Avatar

Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 7,749
Blog Entries: 4
103 mkirkpatrick has much to be proud ofmkirkpatrick has much to be proud ofmkirkpatrick has much to be proud ofmkirkpatrick has much to be proud ofmkirkpatrick has much to be proud ofmkirkpatrick has much to be proud of
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Quote  
07-14-2008, 07:12 PM
Smile Re: Fundamental theorem of arithmetic

Quote:
Originally Posted by AntonioLao View Post
Or the custard.

Fancy me for omitting the custard,I;ll forget the rhubarb next!





regards michael.
__________________
Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
reveal herself?
Reply With Quote
mkirkpatrick is offlineReport Post
Raider of the lost time

AntonioLao's Avatar

Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 6,036
Blog Entries: 6
86 AntonioLao is a splendid one to beholdAntonioLao is a splendid one to beholdAntonioLao is a splendid one to beholdAntonioLao is a splendid one to behold
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Quote  
07-14-2008, 07:16 PM
Re: Fundamental theorem of arithmetic

To exercise your memory is one way to memorize the first billion prime numbers.
__________________
Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²
Reply With Quote
AntonioLao is offlineReport Post
Moderator

mkirkpatrick's Avatar

Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 7,749
Blog Entries: 4
103 mkirkpatrick has much to be proud ofmkirkpatrick has much to be proud ofmkirkpatrick has much to be proud ofmkirkpatrick has much to be proud ofmkirkpatrick has much to be proud ofmkirkpatrick has much to be proud of
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Quote  
07-14-2008, 07:32 PM
Smile Re: Fundamental theorem of arithmetic

Quote:
Originally Posted by AntonioLao View Post
To exercise your memory is one way to memorize the first billion prime numbers.
I will start on that first thing tomorrow.




regards michael
__________________
Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
reveal herself?
Reply With Quote
mkirkpatrick is offlineReport Post
Reply

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:34 PM. Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0 VBulletin Skin by ForumMonkeys.