Welcome to the ToeQuest.
Results 1 to 5 of 5

Thread: missing primes

  1. #1
    Raider of the lost time
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    11,778
    Blog Entries
    10
    Thanks Given
    1,106
    Thanked 1,472x in 1,192 Posts
    Rep Power
    158

    missing primes

    In a sieve of Diophantus, there are whole numbers that are found in the prime locations and yet they are not primes. However, further investigations have found that most of these composites have only 2 prime factors and most are squarefrees, coprimes, with some primitive prime factors. For those numbers less than 100 are the following: 25, 35, 55, 65, 77, 85, 91, and 95. More detailed investigations allow an assertion that numbers located in the two prime positions at relative group-6 indices G22 and G32 if not themselves primes have prime factors composed of squarefrees, coprimes, primitive prime factors, and integral powers of primes. There are 125 primes between 1 and 700 but 111 non-primes in prime locations. However, the Prime Number Theorem predicted approximately 107 primes between 1 and 700. Even without adding the additive error derived from Riemann zeta function, this number 107 is closer to the non-prime number 111 than to the actual prime number count of 125.
    Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²

  2. #2
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Posts
    11,621
    Blog Entries
    5
    Thanks Given
    295
    Thanked 896x in 724 Posts
    Rep Power
    154

    Smile Re: missing primes

    Are they really missing?Or just don't exist! That is the question my dear Watson.




    regards michael.
    Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
    reveal herself?

  3. #3
    Raider of the lost time
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    11,778
    Blog Entries
    10
    Thanks Given
    1,106
    Thanked 1,472x in 1,192 Posts
    Rep Power
    158

    Re: missing primes

    They are composites but by their relative sieve positions they all ought to be prime numbers.
    Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²

  4. #4
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Posts
    11,621
    Blog Entries
    5
    Thanks Given
    295
    Thanked 896x in 724 Posts
    Rep Power
    154

    Smile Re: missing primes

    Quote Originally Posted by AntonioLao View Post
    They are composites but by their relative sieve positions they all ought to be prime numbers.

    Then why are they not then?




    regards michael.
    Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
    reveal herself?

  5. #5
    Raider of the lost time
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    11,778
    Blog Entries
    10
    Thanks Given
    1,106
    Thanked 1,472x in 1,192 Posts
    Rep Power
    158

    Re: missing primes

    They are semiprimes which have the potentiality to be primes. This potentiality could also apply to infinity itself. There is a very good chance that infinity is the largest prime.
    Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²

 

 

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Back to top