ToeQuest

We're going on a TOE Quest!


Register

Reply

Raider of the lost time

AntonioLao's Avatar

Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 6,036
Blog Entries: 6
86 AntonioLao is a splendid one to beholdAntonioLao is a splendid one to beholdAntonioLao is a splendid one to beholdAntonioLao is a splendid one to behold
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Quote  
08-17-2008, 03:57 PM
radical axis

Oxford’s concise dictionary of mathematics defines radical axis of two circles as the straight line containing all points P such that the lengths of the tangents from P to the two circles are equal. However, if the circles intersect in two points then the straight line passing thru them is the radical axis and the common chord contains a subset of P of infinite points from which tangents to the two circles cannot be drawn. If the two circles are tangent at a point p of P then all points of P are on the tangent line. If the two circles do not intersect then the radical axis contains imaginary solutions extended into the complex plane.

In the study of analytic geometry of 2 dimensional Cartesian coordinate system where x=0 is the ordinate vertical axis and y=0 is the abscissa horizontal axis, the general equations of the two circles are x+y+2ax+2by+c=0 and x+y+2dx+2ey+f=0 where a, b, c, d, e, f are all real numbers then the radical axis has the linear equation: 2(a-d)x+2(b-e)y+(c-f)=0 whose slope is given by (d-a)/(b-e) and y-intercept is given by ½(f-c)/(b-e). The sufficient condition for the radical axis to become a vertical line is b=e and if c=f then it is the vertical line x=0. The sufficient condition for the radical axis to become a horizontal line is a=d and if c=f then it is the horizontal line y=0. However, if both conditions a=d and b=e are satisfied then the radical axis vanishes indicating that the circles are concentric.
__________________
Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²
Reply With Quote
AntonioLao is offlineReport Post
Moderator

mkirkpatrick's Avatar

Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 7,749
Blog Entries: 4
103 mkirkpatrick has much to be proud ofmkirkpatrick has much to be proud ofmkirkpatrick has much to be proud ofmkirkpatrick has much to be proud ofmkirkpatrick has much to be proud ofmkirkpatrick has much to be proud of
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Quote  
08-17-2008, 08:02 PM
Smile Re: radical axis

I would prefer a non-radical axis personally!



regards michael.
__________________
Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
reveal herself?
Reply With Quote
mkirkpatrick is offlineReport Post
Raider of the lost time

AntonioLao's Avatar

Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 6,036
Blog Entries: 6
86 AntonioLao is a splendid one to beholdAntonioLao is a splendid one to beholdAntonioLao is a splendid one to beholdAntonioLao is a splendid one to behold
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Quote  
08-18-2008, 11:16 AM
Re: radical axis

A non-radical axis is the same as an imaginary axis where circles of influence never intersect with each other as can be found in the quantum vacuum of spacetime.
__________________
Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²
Reply With Quote
AntonioLao is offlineReport Post
Moderator

mkirkpatrick's Avatar

Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 7,749
Blog Entries: 4
103 mkirkpatrick has much to be proud ofmkirkpatrick has much to be proud ofmkirkpatrick has much to be proud ofmkirkpatrick has much to be proud ofmkirkpatrick has much to be proud ofmkirkpatrick has much to be proud of
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Quote  
08-18-2008, 01:10 PM
Smile Re: radical axis

Quote:
Originally Posted by AntonioLao View Post
A non-radical axis is the same as an imaginary axis where circles of influence never intersect with each other as can be found in the quantum vacuum of spacetime.

Just where would we be without the vacuum?




regards michael.
__________________
Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
reveal herself?
Reply With Quote
mkirkpatrick is offlineReport Post
Raider of the lost time

AntonioLao's Avatar

Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 6,036
Blog Entries: 6
86 AntonioLao is a splendid one to beholdAntonioLao is a splendid one to beholdAntonioLao is a splendid one to beholdAntonioLao is a splendid one to behold
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Quote  
08-19-2008, 11:40 AM
Re: radical axis

Only the quantum vacuum has any bearing for the formations of mass and energy. The continuous vacuum is non-reactive and non-participatory. It is the absolute passive observer of absolute consciousness.
__________________
Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²
Reply With Quote
AntonioLao is offlineReport Post
Reply

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:04 PM. Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0 VBulletin Skin by ForumMonkeys.