Welcome to the ToeQuest.
Results 1 to 5 of 5
  1. #1
    Raider of the lost time
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    11,778
    Blog Entries
    10
    Thanks Given
    1,106
    Thanked 1,472x in 1,192 Posts
    Rep Power
    158

    one or the other

    The reality of antimatter versus matter seems to depend on mutually exclusive spacetime events. As the principle of exclusion of quantum mechanics suggests, these mutually exclusive spacetime events apply completely and totally to elementary particles of fermions but not to elementary particles of bosons. These were verified successfully and accurately by empirical analyses of Fermi-Dirac and Bose-Einstein quantum statistics in high energy physics experiments. In the classical limit of low energy physics these become Maxwell-Boltzmann Statistics.

    At low energy physics the entire universe seems to be dominated exclusively by a spacetime continuum for the distribution of matter even in the interiors of stars. However, the missing solar neutrinos gave a plausible disagreement between theory and experiments and together with the fact that only antineutrinos are involved in all fission reactions of radioactivity by the weak nuclear interaction producing single beta decay when a neutron changed into a proton, electron, and its antineutrino.

    In mathematics, two spacetime events A and B are mutually exclusive if they cannot both occur in the same spacetime position. This implies that their intersection (A Ç B) is the empty set. The probability that one or the other occurs is given by the addition law of probability: P(A È B) = P(A) + P(B) + P(A Ç B). If P(A) is the probability for detecting matter and P(B) is the probability for detecting antimatter then the mystery lies in the observed values that P(A) is about 5%, P(B) is practically zero indicating that P(A Ç B) dominates 95% as reality of the quantum vacuum.
    Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²

  2. #2
    Green Belt
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Posts
    65
    Thanks Given
    0
    Thanked 2x in 2 Posts
    Rep Power
    12

    Re: one or the other

    I guess that the reason why the creation of matter and the creation of antimatter are mutually exclusive is that, when both occur in the same place, they anihillate each other instantly. Is it possible that most of the antimatter could have travelled in the opposite direction to matter spatially and temporily from the initial singularity?

  3. #3
    Raider of the lost time
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    11,778
    Blog Entries
    10
    Thanks Given
    1,106
    Thanked 1,472x in 1,192 Posts
    Rep Power
    158

    Re: one or the other

    Quote Originally Posted by Cubola Zaruka
    Is it possible that most of the antimatter could have travelled in the opposite direction
    Most likely but yet not provable by any state of the arts experiments.
    Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²

  4. #4
    Grandmaster
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    6,657
    Thanks Given
    836
    Thanked 1,049x in 746 Posts
    Rep Power
    105

    Re: one or the other

    If you look at a dome in space, the area within the dome is positive space, the area immediately outside the dome is negative space. Positive and negative space curvatures, each creating ( complementing ) the other. Inner and outer sharing the same space.


  5. #5
    Raider of the lost time
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    11,778
    Blog Entries
    10
    Thanks Given
    1,106
    Thanked 1,472x in 1,192 Posts
    Rep Power
    158

    Re: one or the other

    Thanks, Profpat. In addition I would extend the space domain into spacetime domain and consequently creates 2 Mobius bands of opposing directional invariance. One direction implies positive spacetime and the other negative spacetime.
    Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²

 

 

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Back to top