ToeQuest

We're going on a TOE Quest!


Register

Reply

Raider of the lost time

AntonioLao's Avatar

Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 6,036
Blog Entries: 6
86 AntonioLao is a splendid one to beholdAntonioLao is a splendid one to beholdAntonioLao is a splendid one to beholdAntonioLao is a splendid one to behold
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Quote  
09-15-2008, 01:49 PM
harmonic infinity

In the study of infinite series which are essential for studying the calculus, a long standing problem has been the summation of integer powers of the reciprocals of the positive integers known in general as harmonic series. For the special case where the integer power is unity the series is given by 1+½+1/3+¼+1/5+1/6+1/7+1/8+… More than 2300 years ago Aristotle believed it has a finite sum without knowing how to present a proof.

Eventually, this was proved in the year 1350, to be unbounded and without a limit, its sum diverges to infinity, by the medieval French mathematician and philosopher Nicole Oresme (1320-82). His simple proof was to group the series into its partial sums starting with (1/3+1/4), (1/5+1/6+1/7+1/, etc. and then replacing every term of every group by the smallest term in each group: (1/4+1/4) and (1/8+1/8+1/8+1/, etc. and by inspection it is easily noted that each of these partial sums adds up to ½ and 2 partial sums equal unity and infinite unities become an harmonic infinity. Consequently, the original bigger series must also sum to infinity. However, if the integer power is greater than unity, say 2 then the series is given by 1+1/2+1/3+1/4+1/5+1/6+1/7+1/8+…or equivalently 1+1/4+1/9+1/16+1/25+1/36+1/49+1/64+…and in 1743 it was proved by Euler (1707-83) to converge to the finite sum p/6. In general, all harmonic series with integer power greater than unity converge to a finite sum. For power 4, the sum is p/90. For power 6, the sum is pp/945.
__________________
Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²
Reply With Quote
AntonioLao is offlineReport Post
Grandmaster

Profpat's Avatar

Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 3,778
61 Profpat has a brilliant futureProfpat has a brilliant futureProfpat has a brilliant futureProfpat has a brilliant futureProfpat has a brilliant futureProfpat has a brilliant futureProfpat has a brilliant future
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Quote  
09-15-2008, 02:06 PM
Re: harmonic infinity

Well so much for the harmony Antonio. If it's infinite no more harmony.
Reply With Quote
Profpat is offlineReport Post
Moderator

mkirkpatrick's Avatar

Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 7,749
Blog Entries: 4
103 mkirkpatrick has much to be proud ofmkirkpatrick has much to be proud ofmkirkpatrick has much to be proud ofmkirkpatrick has much to be proud ofmkirkpatrick has much to be proud ofmkirkpatrick has much to be proud of
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Quote  
09-15-2008, 03:20 PM
Smile Re: harmonic infinity

Great thread starter Antonio,the whole universe dances to the tune of harmonics,without
it we could not exist.




regards michael.
__________________
Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
reveal herself?
Reply With Quote
mkirkpatrick is offlineReport Post
Raider of the lost time

AntonioLao's Avatar

Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 6,036
Blog Entries: 6
86 AntonioLao is a splendid one to beholdAntonioLao is a splendid one to beholdAntonioLao is a splendid one to beholdAntonioLao is a splendid one to behold
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Quote  
09-16-2008, 12:52 PM
Re: harmonic infinity

Quote:
Originally Posted by mkirkpatrick
without it we could not exist.
Euler as the greatest analytical mathematician of all time failed to prove the existence of odd harmonies. His world-class tour de force was proving the even harmonies having a finite limit.
__________________
Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²
Reply With Quote
AntonioLao is offlineReport Post
Moderator

mkirkpatrick's Avatar

Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 7,749
Blog Entries: 4
103 mkirkpatrick has much to be proud ofmkirkpatrick has much to be proud ofmkirkpatrick has much to be proud ofmkirkpatrick has much to be proud ofmkirkpatrick has much to be proud ofmkirkpatrick has much to be proud of
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Quote  
09-16-2008, 06:18 PM
Smile Re: harmonic infinity

Quote:
Originally Posted by AntonioLao View Post
Euler as the greatest analytical mathematician of all time failed to prove the existence of odd harmonies. His world-class tour de force was proving the even harmonies having a finite limit.
Thats true,however it is directly related to motion,motion=harmony=physical
universe.No motion no harmony no physical universe!Just the unmanifested
potential.



regards michael.
__________________
Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
reveal herself?
Reply With Quote
mkirkpatrick is offlineReport Post
Raider of the lost time

AntonioLao's Avatar

Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 6,036
Blog Entries: 6
86 AntonioLao is a splendid one to beholdAntonioLao is a splendid one to beholdAntonioLao is a splendid one to beholdAntonioLao is a splendid one to behold
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Quote  
09-17-2008, 12:44 PM
Re: harmonic infinity

Quote:
Originally Posted by mkirkpatrick
it is directly related to motion
Actually, the theory that I am developing is that of a local infinitesimal motion relating the absolute acceleration to the local infinitesimal metrics and for mass unity this is the primary repulsive superforce of the quantum space-time.
__________________
Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²
Reply With Quote
AntonioLao is offlineReport Post
Moderator

mkirkpatrick's Avatar

Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 7,749
Blog Entries: 4
103 mkirkpatrick has much to be proud ofmkirkpatrick has much to be proud ofmkirkpatrick has much to be proud ofmkirkpatrick has much to be proud ofmkirkpatrick has much to be proud ofmkirkpatrick has much to be proud of
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Quote  
09-17-2008, 06:42 PM
Smile Re: harmonic infinity

Quote:
Originally Posted by AntonioLao View Post
Actually, the theory that I am developing is that of a local infinitesimal motion relating the absolute acceleration to the local infinitesimal metrics and for mass unity this is the primary repulsive superforce of the quantum space-time.
Sounds very interesting,would very much like to see the end results of this development.



regards michael.
__________________
Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
reveal herself?
Reply With Quote
mkirkpatrick is offlineReport Post
Raider of the lost time

AntonioLao's Avatar

Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 6,036
Blog Entries: 6
86 AntonioLao is a splendid one to beholdAntonioLao is a splendid one to beholdAntonioLao is a splendid one to beholdAntonioLao is a splendid one to behold
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Quote  
09-18-2008, 12:54 PM
Re: harmonic infinity

Quote:
Originally Posted by mkirkpatrick
the end results
It's trapped in an infinite loop without any exit.
__________________
Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²
Reply With Quote
AntonioLao is offlineReport Post
Reply

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:21 PM. Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0 VBulletin Skin by ForumMonkeys.