One of the atrocities of the world can be found in a killing field. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Killing_Fields
One of the atrocities of the world can be found in a killing field. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Killing_Fields
Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: ¶a(t)·¶r(t)=c²
The killing field is presently occurring in the Congo! Our proclivity to call it a "killing field" is first the social direction to contain the meaning of something in a one word frame. Secondly doing this we are stopped from engaging ourselves fully with unending quantities of information which would make us truly face our own possibilities for carrying out horrible atrocities against our own kind.....
Mikal
This has nothing to do with mathematics. Of course, judging by the title, I thought this would be discussing killing fields in a mathematical sense...
~neutralino
If you haven't found something strange during the day, it hasn't been much of a day - John A. Wheeler.
Hi Neut...if I know Antonio he is probably going to work out some kind of mathematical genius in this thread! The only thing I understand about numbers and math is their psychology, for instance if you have a mathematical mind, it is said..."you have a beautiful mind"...well ordered and balanced and able to work thought wise from a higher rate of vibration. I commented because I understand the term "killing field" so lets hope I did not mess up Antonio's intention for the thread....I sure hope not anyway....
Mikal
Field does imply many things or a large number of things. If there is only one murder it's not considered as a killing field but a million of murders would be. There is a 1 to many correspondence relationship. On the other hand, if an entire universe is destroyed would that be a killing field?
Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: ¶a(t)·¶r(t)=c²
Hi Antonio....I understand the concept of fields, for example I am a researcher so my mind works in a field of thought, perception, conception, creativity and discovery of memories which is aggregate to the field where my own kind works. The field itself is invisible but we as researchers are visible. IMHO...a field is quasi-universal so a whole universe being destroyed would be a killing field created by man functioning from his lower strata of consciousness which leaves the universal aspect out of it.....for the universal aspect is intelligent and knows otherwise positive creation over negative destruction. If you were thinking of something else here, please share that with me as I find the concept of fields immensely fascinating.....
Mikal
Modern physics use the field concept to describe the quantum vacuum fluctuations. These are real experimentally detected vibrations and oscillations of the zero-point energy of virtual particles although the virtual particles themselves can only be isolated for an extremely short time. On the other hand, if these virtual particles can be made into real particles then there is a source of limitless energy from the vacuum.
Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: ¶a(t)·¶r(t)=c²
Could you explain quantum vacumm fluctuations....vibrations and occilations of the zero-point energy....and virtual particles???? This language is what I am here trying to understand...thank you..!!!
Mikal
Mikal,
There are two key experiments that demonstrated these fluctuations: The Casimir Effect and Lamb Shift. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Casimir_effect and http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lamb_shift Both showed that tiny changes in energy can be measured. The cause of these changes cannot be from real particles since there is only vacuum between gaps inside the apparatus. Therefore, the energy changes must be caused by something in the vacuum itself.
Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: ¶a(t)·¶r(t)=c²
Thank you Antonio...I will study your link here and will be back to comment on your thought. Thanks for having patience with me, could I say that from my field I am trying to consenually pierce into your field for insight....
Mikal
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)