Welcome to the ToeQuest.
Results 1 to 3 of 3
  1. #1
    Raider of the lost time
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    11,778
    Blog Entries
    10
    Thanks Given
    1,106
    Thanked 1,472x in 1,192 Posts
    Rep Power
    158

    Proving irrationality


    One way to prove that a given real number is irrational is a proof by contradiction. Given the propositional statement that √2 is not a rational number and supposing this statement is false, that is, suppose √2 is rational then there are integer m and n such that √2=m/n. Furthermore, m/n is reduced to lowest terms, meaning m and n have no common factors except 1. Taking the square of √2=m/n gives m=2n. If m was odd then m is also odd. But m=2n is clearly even. Therefore, m is even and there exists integer p such that m=2p is always true. On the other hand, 2n=4p or n=2p is also even, therefore n is also even. Since both m and n are shown to be even numbers, the fraction m/n is not in lowest terms contrary to the supposition. This is clearly a contradiction. Therefore, √2 is not a rational number.
    Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²

  2. #2
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Posts
    11,621
    Blog Entries
    5
    Thanks Given
    295
    Thanked 896x in 724 Posts
    Rep Power
    154

    Smile Re: Proving irrationality

    Without irrationality this universe could not function,it is wonderful that you can prove
    this Antonio!





    regards michael.
    Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
    reveal herself?

  3. #3
    Raider of the lost time
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    11,778
    Blog Entries
    10
    Thanks Given
    1,106
    Thanked 1,472x in 1,192 Posts
    Rep Power
    158

    Re: Proving irrationality

    Mike,

    I didn't prove it. I simply rephrased what other mathematicians have done. They also assert that there are infinitely more irrational numbers than rational numbers. There is also a proof but might be too much for typing to show it here.
    Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²

 

 

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Back to top