Welcome to the ToeQuest.
Page 1 of 5 12345 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 43
  1. #1
    Raider of the lost time
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    11,778
    Blog Entries
    10
    Thanks Given
    1,106
    Thanked 1,472x in 1,192 Posts
    Rep Power
    158

    One zero one line


    Rotational invariance is achieved for every 360° turn. If the frame of reference is a straight line and if the angular measurement is pivoted at one end then zero degree measure and 360° are both equivalent measures. Furthermore, both also indicate rotational or directional invariance. It implies that clockwise (CW) or counterclockwise (CCW) rotations are indistinguishable.

    If each link of a double Hopf links are turning then with respect to each other there is no way one link can determine the rotational orientation of the other whether CW or CCW. However, if one link made the assumption that it is turning CW then as an absolute frame of reference it can determine whether other links are turning CW or CCW. This distinguishes the distinctive frames for both linear motion and angular motion. The first only needed one zero as a point of origin. In addition, the second needed one perfectly straight infinitely extended line as well. This dual simple-complex frames of reference (one zero one line) can provide the topology of understanding ½-integer and integer multiples of elementary particles’ spins for both fermions and bosons.
    Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²

  2. #2
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Posts
    11,621
    Blog Entries
    5
    Thanks Given
    295
    Thanked 896x in 724 Posts
    Rep Power
    154

    Smile Re: One zero one line

    And from the one line come the many?




    regards michael.
    Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
    reveal herself?

  3. #3
    Raider of the lost time
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    11,778
    Blog Entries
    10
    Thanks Given
    1,106
    Thanked 1,472x in 1,192 Posts
    Rep Power
    158

    Re: One zero one line

    The geometric definition of a line is that it is made of an infinite number of points.
    Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²

  4. #4
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Posts
    11,621
    Blog Entries
    5
    Thanks Given
    295
    Thanked 896x in 724 Posts
    Rep Power
    154

    Smile Re: One zero one line

    Quote Originally Posted by AntonioLao View Post
    The geometric definition of a line is that it is made of an infinite number of points.
    That is so.



    regards michael.
    Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
    reveal herself?

  5. #5
    Raider of the lost time
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    11,778
    Blog Entries
    10
    Thanks Given
    1,106
    Thanked 1,472x in 1,192 Posts
    Rep Power
    158

    Re: One zero one line

    Then we proved that physical reality is one dimensional: the sum of infinite number of zero dimensional points.
    Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²

  6. #6
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Posts
    11,621
    Blog Entries
    5
    Thanks Given
    295
    Thanked 896x in 724 Posts
    Rep Power
    154

    Smile Re: One zero one line

    Quote Originally Posted by AntonioLao View Post
    Then we proved that physical reality is one dimensional: the sum of infinite number of zero dimensional points.
    That about sums it up,yes.



    regards michael.
    Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
    reveal herself?

  7. #7
    Raider of the lost time
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    11,778
    Blog Entries
    10
    Thanks Given
    1,106
    Thanked 1,472x in 1,192 Posts
    Rep Power
    158

    Re: One zero one line

    Consequently, we disproved 11-dimension superstring.
    Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²

  8. #8
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Posts
    11,621
    Blog Entries
    5
    Thanks Given
    295
    Thanked 896x in 724 Posts
    Rep Power
    154

    Smile Re: One zero one line

    Quote Originally Posted by AntonioLao View Post
    Consequently, we disproved 11-dimension superstring.

    We did!



    regards michael.
    Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
    reveal herself?

  9. #9
    Raider of the lost time
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    11,778
    Blog Entries
    10
    Thanks Given
    1,106
    Thanked 1,472x in 1,192 Posts
    Rep Power
    158

    Re: One zero one line

    Our next task is to disprove the 4-dimension space-time.
    Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²

  10. #10
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Posts
    11,621
    Blog Entries
    5
    Thanks Given
    295
    Thanked 896x in 724 Posts
    Rep Power
    154

    Smile Re: One zero one line

    Quote Originally Posted by AntonioLao View Post
    Our next task is to disprove the 4-dimension space-time.

    Forward into action then!




    regards michael.
    Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
    reveal herself?

 

 
Page 1 of 5 12345 LastLast

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Back to top