Welcome to the ToeQuest.
Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 21
  1. #1
    Raider of the lost time
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    11,778
    Blog Entries
    10
    Thanks Given
    1,106
    Thanked 1,472x in 1,192 Posts
    Rep Power
    158

    Inverse beta fusion

    Inverse beta fusion

    The traditional scientific method of detecting the existence of electron neutrinos was by the subatomic interactions known inverse beta-decay. This was first directly observed by Frederick Reines http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frederick_Reines and Clyde Cowan http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clyde_Cowan in 1956. Cowan died in 1974, so only Reines received the Nobel Prize for Physics in 1995, the Prize was never awarded posthumously. The subatomic interaction shows that an electron antineutrino interacts with a proton creating a neutron and a positron or in terms of quark: the electron antineutrino plus an up quark create a down quark plus a positron. However, this has extremely small collision cross-section and correspondingly the mean free path of collision in water for the electron antineutrino with collision energy of 1 million electron volts is about 1000 000 000 000 000 000 meters or approximately 50 light-years. This suggests that for all practical purposes the electron antineutrino has no desire to interact with anything where and when going at it all alone.

    Since there are at least two more species of antineutrino: the muon’s and the tauon’s, it can be hypothesized that in order to speed up inverse beta-decay would require the involvement of these other neutrinos. So that each of these three neutrinos acts as a chromatode: one as a rode, one as a gode, and as a bode for color changing transformation of an up quark to a down quark for cold fusion. The hardest task is simply to get enough of all three neutrinos together into the interaction.
    Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²

  2. #2
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Posts
    11,621
    Blog Entries
    5
    Thanks Given
    295
    Thanked 896x in 724 Posts
    Rep Power
    154

    Smile Re: Inverse beta fusion

    Cold fusion is already a reality within the mind,soon it will
    take substance and materialize within the physical realm,
    will it to be.




    regards michael.
    Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
    reveal herself?

  3. #3
    Raider of the lost time
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    11,778
    Blog Entries
    10
    Thanks Given
    1,106
    Thanked 1,472x in 1,192 Posts
    Rep Power
    158

    Re: Inverse beta fusion

    It is a complete reality within absolute consciousness but partially realized in many domains (Newton, Maxwell, Einstein, Feynman, Gell-Mann, and others) of relative consciousness.
    Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²

  4. #4
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Posts
    11,621
    Blog Entries
    5
    Thanks Given
    295
    Thanked 896x in 724 Posts
    Rep Power
    154

    Smile Re: Inverse beta fusion

    Quote Originally Posted by AntonioLao View Post
    It is a complete reality within absolute consciousness but partially realized in many domains (Newton, Maxwell, Einstein, Feynman, Gell-Mann, and others) of relative consciousness.
    It will grow and "spill" out into the physical realm.



    regards michael.
    Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
    reveal herself?

  5. #5
    Raider of the lost time
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    11,778
    Blog Entries
    10
    Thanks Given
    1,106
    Thanked 1,472x in 1,192 Posts
    Rep Power
    158

    Re: Inverse beta fusion

    I wondering would all these dead geniuses be willing to return to relative consciousness now that they are with absolute consciousness???
    Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²

  6. #6
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Posts
    11,621
    Blog Entries
    5
    Thanks Given
    295
    Thanked 896x in 724 Posts
    Rep Power
    154

    Smile Re: Inverse beta fusion

    Quote Originally Posted by AntonioLao View Post
    I wondering would all these dead geniuses be willing to return to relative consciousness now that they are with absolute consciousness???
    I am sure that some would.




    regards michael.
    Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
    reveal herself?

  7. #7
    Raider of the lost time
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    11,778
    Blog Entries
    10
    Thanks Given
    1,106
    Thanked 1,472x in 1,192 Posts
    Rep Power
    158

    Re: Inverse beta fusion

    All or nothing, that is the way to get to the TOE.
    Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²

  8. #8
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Posts
    11,621
    Blog Entries
    5
    Thanks Given
    295
    Thanked 896x in 724 Posts
    Rep Power
    154

    Smile Re: Inverse beta fusion

    Quote Originally Posted by AntonioLao View Post
    All or nothing, that is the way to get to the TOE.
    We each must give our all.



    regards michael.
    Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
    reveal herself?

  9. #9
    Raider of the lost time
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    11,778
    Blog Entries
    10
    Thanks Given
    1,106
    Thanked 1,472x in 1,192 Posts
    Rep Power
    158

    Re: Inverse beta fusion

    The widely accepted motto is 'all for one and one for all'. If there are 3 musketeers then there ought to be 3 neutrinos then cold fusion.
    Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²

  10. #10
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Posts
    11,621
    Blog Entries
    5
    Thanks Given
    295
    Thanked 896x in 724 Posts
    Rep Power
    154

    Smile Re: Inverse beta fusion

    Quote Originally Posted by AntonioLao View Post
    The widely accepted motto is 'all for one and one for all'. If there are 3 musketeers then there ought to be 3 neutrinos then cold fusion.

    Where are they?



    regards michael.
    Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
    reveal herself?

 

 
Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Back to top