Welcome to the ToeQuest.
Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 22
  1. #1
    Raider of the lost time
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    11,778
    Blog Entries
    10
    Thanks Given
    1,106
    Thanked 1,472x in 1,192 Posts
    Rep Power
    158

    Electrochromatolyticity


    The absolute quantum vacuum exists in a state of perpetual electrochromatolyticity. This is a state of almost perfect neutrality or dynamic equilibrium for both electric charge and color charge. The electric component allows photons to move at the measurable speed of 300 millions meters per second while the chromatic component allows neutrinos to move with mean free path greater than 50 light years.

    Controlling both components would create the portability of a multi-step cold fusion engine for antigravitic space-time travel, thus realizing the dreams of science fiction novels since H.G. Wells wrote “The Time Machine” in 1895, 10 years before Einstein’s special theory of relativity. A retrospective study of these two components would also certainly vindicate Sir Arthur S. Eddington’s treatise of 1926: The Internal Constitution of the Stars. It can be hypothesized that stellar evolutions follows exactly the working principle of electrochromatolyticity. Separately, the electric component is also subatomically connected to an intermediate component known simply as the weak component and together as the electroweak component. All these distinct components are described almost completely in quantum electrodynamics (QED) and quantum chromodynamics (QCD) and all together comprise the Standard Model of elementary particles and high energy physics. However, stand alone, none can fully initiate cold fusion but together there lies the promise of electrochromatolyticity as the ultimate domination of the absolute quantum vacuum where and when the ERGB Effect is detected by delicate experimentations.
    Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²

  2. #2
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Posts
    11,621
    Blog Entries
    5
    Thanks Given
    295
    Thanked 896x in 724 Posts
    Rep Power
    154

    Smile Re: Electrochromatolyticity

    This seems a tad complex,will need to re-oil my thinking
    cap!



    regards michael.
    Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
    reveal herself?

  3. #3
    Raider of the lost time
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    11,778
    Blog Entries
    10
    Thanks Given
    1,106
    Thanked 1,472x in 1,192 Posts
    Rep Power
    158

    Re: Electrochromatolyticity

    Since the absolute quantum vacuum is invisible to the naked eye it is advisable to see it with absolute consciousness antigravity time reversed vision.
    Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²

  4. #4
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Posts
    11,621
    Blog Entries
    5
    Thanks Given
    295
    Thanked 896x in 724 Posts
    Rep Power
    154

    Smile Re: Electrochromatolyticity

    Quote Originally Posted by AntonioLao View Post
    Since the absolute quantum vacuum is invisible to the naked eye it is advisable to see it with absolute consciousness antigravity time reversed vision.

    I will "bare" that in mind.



    regards michael.
    Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
    reveal herself?

  5. #5
    Raider of the lost time
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    11,778
    Blog Entries
    10
    Thanks Given
    1,106
    Thanked 1,472x in 1,192 Posts
    Rep Power
    158

    Re: Electrochromatolyticity

    Cosmologists are having difficulties seeing the naked singularity of the big bang whether it exists or not. This is the same type of dilemma as the hole concept.
    Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²

  6. #6
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Posts
    11,621
    Blog Entries
    5
    Thanks Given
    295
    Thanked 896x in 724 Posts
    Rep Power
    154

    Smile Re: Electrochromatolyticity

    Quote Originally Posted by AntonioLao View Post
    Cosmologists are having difficulties seeing the naked singularity of the big bang whether it exists or not. This is the same type of dilemma as the hole concept.

    Are we not in a hole 0 looking out?


    regards michael.
    Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
    reveal herself?

  7. #7
    Raider of the lost time
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    11,778
    Blog Entries
    10
    Thanks Given
    1,106
    Thanked 1,472x in 1,192 Posts
    Rep Power
    158

    Re: Electrochromatolyticity

    Looking out we need a telescope. Looking in we need a microscope. Coincidentally, if we look thru the other end of the telescope it becomes a microscope, vice versa. Incidentally, the power of resolution or magnification depended on the focal length of the lenses.
    Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²

  8. #8
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Posts
    11,621
    Blog Entries
    5
    Thanks Given
    295
    Thanked 896x in 724 Posts
    Rep Power
    154

    Smile Re: Electrochromatolyticity

    Quote Originally Posted by AntonioLao View Post
    Looking out we need a telescope. Looking in we need a microscope. Coincidentally, if we look thru the other end of the telescope it becomes a microscope, vice versa. Incidentally, the power of resolution or magnification depended on the focal length of the lenses.
    In my retirement I think I will buy myself a telescope
    with so many clear nights in Turkey I might even see a black hole!!


    regards michael.
    Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
    reveal herself?

  9. #9
    Raider of the lost time
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    11,778
    Blog Entries
    10
    Thanks Given
    1,106
    Thanked 1,472x in 1,192 Posts
    Rep Power
    158

    Re: Electrochromatolyticity

    If money is not a problem then you could build a telescope of compound mirrors with resolution 100 times better than Hubble space telescope, but maybe not since the atmosphere destroys its optical quality.
    Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²

  10. #10
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Posts
    11,621
    Blog Entries
    5
    Thanks Given
    295
    Thanked 896x in 724 Posts
    Rep Power
    154

    Smile Re: Electrochromatolyticity

    Quote Originally Posted by AntonioLao View Post
    If money is not a problem then you could build a telescope of compound mirrors with resolution 100 times better than Hubble space telescope, but maybe not since the atmosphere destroys its optical quality.
    I wish!However I am not rich enough to anywhere near
    match that Hubble thing.



    regards michael.
    Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
    reveal herself?

 

 
Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Back to top