Welcome to the ToeQuest.
Page 1 of 7 12345 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 69
  1. #1
    Raider of the lost time
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    11,778
    Blog Entries
    10
    Thanks Given
    1,106
    Thanked 1,472x in 1,192 Posts
    Rep Power
    158

    living direction math

    The math of life measures degrees of directional invariance that a particular spacetime location can be defined. This location is defined completely with two spacetime parameters called the alpha and the beta parameters. In three Cartesian dimensions X, Y, and Z, the parametric equations are X=cos(alpha), Y=sin(alpha) and Z=sin(beta) with the addtional requirement that X=1+sin(beta) such that cos(alpha)-sin(beta)=1. To be continued...
    Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²

  2. #2
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Posts
    11,621
    Blog Entries
    5
    Thanks Given
    295
    Thanked 896x in 724 Posts
    Rep Power
    154

    Smile Re: living direction math

    A most interesting thread starter my friend,where will it lead?




    regards michael.
    Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
    reveal herself?

  3. #3
    Raider of the lost time
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    11,778
    Blog Entries
    10
    Thanks Given
    1,106
    Thanked 1,472x in 1,192 Posts
    Rep Power
    158

    Re: living direction math

    It leads to the absolute measures of absolute consciousness using only integers and angular values between 0 and 1.
    Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²

  4. #4
    Raider of the lost time
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    11,778
    Blog Entries
    10
    Thanks Given
    1,106
    Thanked 1,472x in 1,192 Posts
    Rep Power
    158

    1st continuation

    From the expression cos(alpha)-sin(beta)=1, alpha values vary between 0°and 90°while beta values vary between 180°and 360°. However, from the expression cos(alpha)+sin(beta)=1, alpha vary between 0°and 90°while beta values vary between 0°and 180°.
    Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²

  5. #5
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Posts
    11,621
    Blog Entries
    5
    Thanks Given
    295
    Thanked 896x in 724 Posts
    Rep Power
    154

    Smile Re: 1st continuation

    Quote Originally Posted by AntonioLao View Post
    From the expression cos(alpha)-sin(beta)=1, alpha values vary between 0°and 90°while beta values vary between 180°and 360°. However, from the expression cos(alpha)+sin(beta)=1, alpha vary between 0°and 90°while beta values vary between 0°and 180°.
    Now this seems to becoming complex,can it be simplified?


    regards michael.
    Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
    reveal herself?

  6. #6
    Raider of the lost time
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    11,778
    Blog Entries
    10
    Thanks Given
    1,106
    Thanked 1,472x in 1,192 Posts
    Rep Power
    158

    Re: living direction math

    To simplify would need the incorporation of imaginary numbers which I'm trying my best to avoid.
    Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²

  7. #7
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Posts
    11,621
    Blog Entries
    5
    Thanks Given
    295
    Thanked 896x in 724 Posts
    Rep Power
    154

    Smile Re: living direction math

    Quote Originally Posted by AntonioLao View Post
    To simplify would need the incorporation of imaginary numbers which I'm trying my best to avoid.
    Why are you trying to avoid this!




    regards michael.
    Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
    reveal herself?

  8. #8
    Raider of the lost time
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    11,778
    Blog Entries
    10
    Thanks Given
    1,106
    Thanked 1,472x in 1,192 Posts
    Rep Power
    158

    Re: living direction math

    Because they (imaginary numbers) are not part of absolute consciousness or relative consciousness. Although quantum mechanics is based on imaginary numbers it is the angular phase factor that makes any sense. But these angular phase factors can now be replaced by the alpha and beta parameters of 3D spacetime which are fundamentally equivalent to Hadamard real matrices while the spin matrices of QM are imaginary matrices.
    Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²

  9. #9
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Posts
    11,621
    Blog Entries
    5
    Thanks Given
    295
    Thanked 896x in 724 Posts
    Rep Power
    154

    Smile Re: living direction math

    Quote Originally Posted by AntonioLao View Post
    Because they (imaginary numbers) are not part of absolute consciousness or relative consciousness. Although quantum mechanics is based on imaginary numbers it is the angular phase factor that makes any sense. But these angular phase factors can now be replaced by the alpha and beta parameters of 3D spacetime which are fundamentally equivalent to Hadamard real matrices while the spin matrices of QM are imaginary matrices.
    Right,I think I understand you now!



    regards michael.
    Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
    reveal herself?

  10. #10
    Raider of the lost time
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    11,778
    Blog Entries
    10
    Thanks Given
    1,106
    Thanked 1,472x in 1,192 Posts
    Rep Power
    158

    Re: living direction math

    More importantly, all these are embedded within a sieve of Diophantus except of course the whole number 1. The sieve is a sieve simply because there is no unity. It starts with 0, then 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, ...all the way to infinity.
    Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²

 

 
Page 1 of 7 12345 ... LastLast

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Back to top