Welcome to the ToeQuest.
Page 1 of 10 12345 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 95
  1. #1
    Raider of the lost time
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    11,778
    Blog Entries
    10
    Thanks Given
    1,106
    Thanked 1,472x in 1,192 Posts
    Rep Power
    158

    imaginary Lie vs real Hadamard groups

    The search continues for a symmetric gauge group that can completely describe a quantum field theory of gravity. The study of continuous groups (e.g. rotation groups) was started by Sophus Lie (1842-99) in the latter parts of the 1800s. He sought to characterize geometries in which rigid body motions are possible. But he analyzed the same problem stated by Helmholtz earlier that if the motions of rigid bodies are to be possible on a space then Riemann’s expression for ds in a space of constant curvature is the only one possible. The result of his research became known as a theory of continuous transformation groups. He then characterized the spaces in which rigid motions are possible by means of the kinds of groups of transformations which these spaces permit. However, where and when these spaces are replaced by a spacetime continuum, the results at best can only be imaginary Lie groups, for examples, Pauli spin matrices and Dirac matrices in QM.

    To return to the real continuous groups, it is possible simply by using square symmetric Hadamard matrices. Whose elements are either 1 or -1. Abelian additions give complete descriptions of all physical charges: electric, weak, and color. Abelian multiplications give complete descriptions of physical masses beginning from first principle. The spacetime projections of these groups are completely described by parametric equations for an alpha and a beta angular parameter. Whose inverse domains are found within a sieve of Diophantus. Furthermore, the alpha domain or the beta domain does not simultaneously exist thus giving a true real quantized nature of the spacetime continuum.
    Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²

  2. #2
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Posts
    11,621
    Blog Entries
    5
    Thanks Given
    295
    Thanked 896x in 724 Posts
    Rep Power
    154

    Smile Re: imaginary Lie vs real Hadamard groups

    All things exist within the mind,however "allthings" are not
    particulary real,at best they are only relatively real,thereby
    not absolute.



    regards michael.
    Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
    reveal herself?

  3. #3
    Raider of the lost time
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    11,778
    Blog Entries
    10
    Thanks Given
    1,106
    Thanked 1,472x in 1,192 Posts
    Rep Power
    158

    Re: imaginary Lie vs real Hadamard groups

    Are then the imaginaries to be found in the imagine nation?
    Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²

  4. #4
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Posts
    11,621
    Blog Entries
    5
    Thanks Given
    295
    Thanked 896x in 724 Posts
    Rep Power
    154

    Smile Re: imaginary Lie vs real Hadamard groups

    Quote Originally Posted by AntonioLao View Post
    Are then the imaginaries to be found in the imagine nation?
    Yes there are!



    regards michael.
    Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
    reveal herself?

  5. #5
    Raider of the lost time
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    11,778
    Blog Entries
    10
    Thanks Given
    1,106
    Thanked 1,472x in 1,192 Posts
    Rep Power
    158

    Re: imaginary Lie vs real Hadamard groups

    But some are busily giving us the electric promotion?
    Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²

  6. #6
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Posts
    11,621
    Blog Entries
    5
    Thanks Given
    295
    Thanked 896x in 724 Posts
    Rep Power
    154

    Smile Re: imaginary Lie vs real Hadamard groups

    Quote Originally Posted by AntonioLao View Post
    But some are busily giving us the electric promotion?

    Then the sparks will fly!




    regards michael.
    Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
    reveal herself?

  7. #7
    Raider of the lost time
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    11,778
    Blog Entries
    10
    Thanks Given
    1,106
    Thanked 1,472x in 1,192 Posts
    Rep Power
    158

    Re: imaginary Lie vs real Hadamard groups

    Also periodic Fourier transformations.
    Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²

  8. #8
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Posts
    11,621
    Blog Entries
    5
    Thanks Given
    295
    Thanked 896x in 724 Posts
    Rep Power
    154

    Smile Re: imaginary Lie vs real Hadamard groups

    Quote Originally Posted by AntonioLao View Post
    Also periodic Fourier transformations.
    Them as well of course!




    regards michael.
    Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
    reveal herself?

  9. #9
    Raider of the lost time
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    11,778
    Blog Entries
    10
    Thanks Given
    1,106
    Thanked 1,472x in 1,192 Posts
    Rep Power
    158

    Re: imaginary Lie vs real Hadamard groups

    But Fourier never wanted to use imaginary numbers and I'm not sure who started it.
    Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²

  10. #10
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Posts
    11,621
    Blog Entries
    5
    Thanks Given
    295
    Thanked 896x in 724 Posts
    Rep Power
    154

    Smile Re: imaginary Lie vs real Hadamard groups

    Quote Originally Posted by AntonioLao View Post
    But Fourier never wanted to use imaginary numbers and I'm not sure who started it.
    Well then we can start by refusing to use them here.



    regards michael.
    Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
    reveal herself?

 

 
Page 1 of 10 12345 ... LastLast

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Back to top