Welcome to the ToeQuest.
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 11
  1. #1
    Raider of the lost time
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    11,778
    Blog Entries
    10
    Thanks Given
    1,106
    Thanked 1,472x in 1,192 Posts
    Rep Power
    158

    least common multiple


    The least common multiple (LCM) of two or more non-zero integers has the property of dividing any other larger common multiple. If their prime decompositions are known, the LCM is easily obtained. For the integers 168 and 180, their respective prime decompositions are (2)(3)(7) and (2)(3)(5) then the LCM is given as (2)(3)(5)(7)=2520.

    On the other hand, the least common vacuum spacetime multiple of spacetime charges is always certain product of power of 2 and certain prime integers. For example, the proton of 2 up quarks and 1 down quark with 16 spacetime charges and the neutron of 1 up quark and 2 down quarks with 14 spacetime charges, the corresponding LCM for (16,14) is 112. For the electron with 8 spacetime charges, the LCM of electron and proton ( 8,16 ) is still 16. For photon with 8 spacetime charges the LCM of photon-electron ( 8, 8 ) is 8. For a neutrino with 2 spacetime charges the neutrino-photon LCM ( 2,8 ) is 8. For W-boson with 10 spacetime charges, its LCM with the neutrino is 10, its LCM with the photon or electron is 40. For Z-boson with 16 spacetime charges, its LCM with the proton is also 16. However, its LCM with the up, charm, or top quark is 48 and its LCM with the down, strange, or bottom quark is still 16. Incidentally, LCM solves the same mathematical processes of finding the least common denominator (LCD) of rational numerical or algebraic fractions.
    Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²

  2. #2
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Posts
    11,621
    Blog Entries
    5
    Thanks Given
    295
    Thanked 896x in 724 Posts
    Rep Power
    154

    Smile Re: least common multiple

    MIM (mind in matter) seems to be a basic if not common
    denominator that drives expressed reality.




    regards michael.
    Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
    reveal herself?

  3. #3
    Raider of the lost time
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    11,778
    Blog Entries
    10
    Thanks Given
    1,106
    Thanked 1,472x in 1,192 Posts
    Rep Power
    158

    Re: least common multiple

    Matter brain is about 15 centimeters in length, at lightspeed this gives the frequency of consciousness as 2 gigacycles.
    Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²

  4. #4
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Posts
    11,621
    Blog Entries
    5
    Thanks Given
    295
    Thanked 896x in 724 Posts
    Rep Power
    154

    Smile Re: least common multiple

    Quote Originally Posted by AntonioLao View Post
    Matter brain is about 15 centimeters in length, at lightspeed this gives the frequency of consciousness as 2 gigacycles.
    I was completely unaware of that most interesting
    piece of information.thank you.



    regards michael.
    Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
    reveal herself?

  5. #5
    Raider of the lost time
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    11,778
    Blog Entries
    10
    Thanks Given
    1,106
    Thanked 1,472x in 1,192 Posts
    Rep Power
    158

    Re: least common multiple

    However, absolute consciousness vibrates at a frequency of infinite cycle. At Planck length this frequency is the reciprocal of Planck time.
    Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²

  6. #6
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Posts
    11,621
    Blog Entries
    5
    Thanks Given
    295
    Thanked 896x in 724 Posts
    Rep Power
    154

    Smile Re: least common multiple

    Quote Originally Posted by AntonioLao View Post
    However, absolute consciousness vibrates at a frequency of infinite cycle. At Planck length this frequency is the reciprocal of Planck time.
    trilling at frequency beyond human comprehension.


    regards michael.
    Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
    reveal herself?

  7. #7
    Raider of the lost time
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    11,778
    Blog Entries
    10
    Thanks Given
    1,106
    Thanked 1,472x in 1,192 Posts
    Rep Power
    158

    Re: least common multiple

    You mean human comprehension of absolute consciousness? Physics can only describe Planck consciousness near the big bang singularity.
    Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²

  8. #8
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Posts
    11,621
    Blog Entries
    5
    Thanks Given
    295
    Thanked 896x in 724 Posts
    Rep Power
    154

    Smile Re: least common multiple

    Quote Originally Posted by AntonioLao View Post
    You mean human comprehension of absolute consciousness? Physics can only describe Planck consciousness near the big bang singularity.

    Yes.While encased in finite form we can never realise absolute consciousness.



    regards michael.
    Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
    reveal herself?

  9. #9
    Raider of the lost time
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    11,778
    Blog Entries
    10
    Thanks Given
    1,106
    Thanked 1,472x in 1,192 Posts
    Rep Power
    158

    Re: least common multiple

    But encased in the one-sided topology of a Moebius strip or a Klein bottle the quantization of a spacetime contiuum becomes square of energy.
    Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²

  10. #10
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Posts
    11,621
    Blog Entries
    5
    Thanks Given
    295
    Thanked 896x in 724 Posts
    Rep Power
    154

    Smile Re: least common multiple

    Quote Originally Posted by AntonioLao View Post
    But encased in the one-sided topology of a Moebius strip or a Klein bottle the quantization of a spacetime contiuum becomes square of energy.

    I can live with that,can you?



    regards michael.
    Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
    reveal herself?

 

 
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Back to top