Welcome to the ToeQuest.
Results 1 to 5 of 5
  1. #1
    Raider of the lost time
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    11,778
    Blog Entries
    10
    Thanks Given
    1,106
    Thanked 1,472x in 1,192 Posts
    Rep Power
    158

    virtual directions


    Compare to real physical directions which can be measured by specifying some angles within a given coordinate system, virtual directions cannot be so specified accordingly as such. On the other hand, using the sieve of Diophantus and its embedding system of Hadamard matrices virtual directions are represented by multi-dimensional square matrices of different orders, the simplest of these being all 2 by 2 matrices. Since every 2 by 2 matrix always has 4 elements, two always have the values of positive unity and two values of negative unity. Furthermore, symmetry requirement demands that the pairs always appear along the main diagonal such that the values of the traces are always either 2 or -2.

    For 3 by 3 matrices the traces always have values of 3 or -3. For 4 by 4 matrices, the traces always have values of 4 or -4, 5 by 5 values of 5 or -5, 6 by 6 values of 6 or -6, 7 by 7 values of 7 or -7, 8 by 8 values of 8 or -8. For an infinite dimensions square matrix, the trace values are either positive infinity or negative infinity. This infinite matrix can be properly defined as the one and only singular matrix called a sieve of Diophantus. Each of these infinitely countable dimensional traces signifies the number of virtual directions within a particular ordered spacetime dimension. These are defined without specifying a given coordinate system or any set of angular measurements. Lastly, it can be noted that the trace of any square matrix is defined accordingly as the sum of the elements found along the main diagonal. In quantum mechanics, these sums can be imaginary numbers except of course if they happened to be Hermitian matrices as energy quantization of their real eigenvalues.

    Concepts' references: http://mathworld.wolfram.com/HermitianMatrix.html and http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hermitian_matrix
    Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²

  2. #2
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Posts
    11,621
    Blog Entries
    5
    Thanks Given
    295
    Thanked 896x in 724 Posts
    Rep Power
    154

    Smile Re: virtual directions

    Deep within our beings promptings arise and break the surface of waking consciousness these are directions of
    soul unfoldment,are these virtual or real?



    regards michael.
    Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
    reveal herself?

  3. #3
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    4,896
    Blog Entries
    24
    Thanks Given
    2,967
    Thanked 2,727x in 1,670 Posts
    Rep Power
    92

    Re: virtual directions

    Quote Originally Posted by mkirkpatrick View Post
    are these virtual or real?
    They could be really virtual .. lol. Howzit goin you bloody pom.

    Quote Originally Posted by AntonioLao View Post
    Compare to real physical directions which can be measured by specifying some angles within a given coordinate system.......
    Hi Antonio .... Perhaps you could help out once again in another thread starting HERE. We have become confused about this same issue

    cool bananas ... greg
    'Blondie says I must hate all Brunettes. I'll try, but if I can't ... I'll love them both'
    ... graffiti on Tavern wall, Pompeii, circa AD 70.

  4. #4
    Raider of the lost time
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    11,778
    Blog Entries
    10
    Thanks Given
    1,106
    Thanked 1,472x in 1,192 Posts
    Rep Power
    158

    Re: virtual directions

    Quote Originally Posted by mkirkpatrick
    are these virtual or real?
    Most require physical proofs, some require mathematical proofs, a few require no proofs at all. I am first working the math proofs then hopefully the physical proofs from cold fusion.
    Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²

  5. #5
    Raider of the lost time
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    11,778
    Blog Entries
    10
    Thanks Given
    1,106
    Thanked 1,472x in 1,192 Posts
    Rep Power
    158

    Re: virtual directions

    Quote Originally Posted by Graybeard
    We have become confused about this same issue
    If I accepted Wick's RLT then I'll be confused. But if I work on a theory of directional invariance for
    quantization of spacetime continuum of squares of energy then my confusion disappeared.
    Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²

 

 

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Back to top