LinkBack URL
About LinkBacksTopological winding of field lines is a directional property of spacetime. Where and when these windings reached a state of completeness there and then the axis of polarization is created. That is to say partial winding has no polarization axis.
Welcome to the ToeQuest.
Results 1 to 8 of 8
Thread: spin direction vs polarization
- 04-23-2009, 01:31 PM #1Raider of the lost time
- Join Date
- Nov 2003
- Location
- United States
- Posts
- 11,778
- Blog Entries
- 10
- Thanks Given
- 1,106
- Thanked 1,472x in 1,192 Posts
- Rep Power
- 158
spin direction vs polarization
Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: ¶a(t)·¶r(t)=c²
- 04-23-2009, 04:40 PM #2Moderator
- Join Date
- Aug 2005
- Location
- United Kingdom
- Posts
- 11,621
- Blog Entries
- 5
- Thanks Given
- 295
- Thanked 896x in 724 Posts
- Rep Power
- 154
Re: spin direction vs polarization Sounds a tad complex my friend,is there a way to express
this idea more simply?
regards michael.Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
reveal herself?
- 04-23-2009, 04:51 PM #3Moderator
- Join Date
- Aug 2005
- Location
- Australia
- Posts
- 4,896
- Blog Entries
- 24
- Thanks Given
- 2,967
- Thanked 2,727x in 1,670 Posts
- Rep Power
- 92
Re: spin direction vs polarization
Isn't that the same as saying, 'something that doesn't exist, doesn't exist' ?
Originally Posted by AntonioLao 
cool bananas ... greg
'Blondie says I must hate all Brunettes. I'll try, but if I can't ... I'll love them both'
... graffiti on Tavern wall, Pompeii, circa AD 70.
- 04-23-2009, 05:12 PM #4Moderator
- Join Date
- Aug 2005
- Location
- United Kingdom
- Posts
- 11,621
- Blog Entries
- 5
- Thanks Given
- 295
- Thanked 896x in 724 Posts
- Rep Power
- 154
Re: spin direction vs polarization Please mate,keep it simple,KISS=keep it simple stupid,no reflection on you of course good buddy. Originally Posted by Graybeard Isn't that the same as saying, 'something that doesn't exist, doesn't exist' ?
cool bananas ... greg
regards michael.Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
reveal herself?
- 04-23-2009, 05:14 PM #5Moderator
- Join Date
- Aug 2005
- Location
- Australia
- Posts
- 4,896
- Blog Entries
- 24
- Thanks Given
- 2,967
- Thanked 2,727x in 1,670 Posts
- Rep Power
- 92
Re: spin direction vs polarization
Howzitgoin Buddy. I don't see or hear enough from you anymore ? When are you hitting the shores of downunder ? Originally Posted by mkirkpatrick
cool bananas ... greg
'Blondie says I must hate all Brunettes. I'll try, but if I can't ... I'll love them both'
... graffiti on Tavern wall, Pompeii, circa AD 70.
- 04-23-2009, 05:55 PM #6Moderator
- Join Date
- Aug 2005
- Location
- United Kingdom
- Posts
- 11,621
- Blog Entries
- 5
- Thanks Given
- 295
- Thanked 896x in 724 Posts
- Rep Power
- 154
Re: spin direction vs polarization Originally Posted by Graybeard Howzitgoin Buddy. I don't see or hear enough from you anymore ? When are you hitting the shores of downunder ?
cool bananas ... greg
Next year all being well mate.
regards michael.Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
reveal herself?
- 04-25-2009, 12:20 PM #7Raider of the lost time
- Join Date
- Nov 2003
- Location
- United States
- Posts
- 11,778
- Blog Entries
- 10
- Thanks Given
- 1,106
- Thanked 1,472x in 1,192 Posts
- Rep Power
- 158
Re: spin direction vs polarization
An analogy is that it is logically pointless to talk about a person going to heaven or going to hell until death. In other words, a life must completely wind down or wind up to reach the polarized state of heaven or hell. Originally Posted by mkirkpatrick Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: ¶a(t)·¶r(t)=c²
- 04-25-2009, 12:24 PM #8Raider of the lost time
- Join Date
- Nov 2003
- Location
- United States
- Posts
- 11,778
- Blog Entries
- 10
- Thanks Given
- 1,106
- Thanked 1,472x in 1,192 Posts
- Rep Power
- 158
Re: spin direction vs polarization
Yes. Alternatively, 'something exists only if another thing exists'. Nothing can exist by itself. Everything exists because a thing exists. Originally Posted by Graybeard Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: ¶a(t)·¶r(t)=c²
Reply With QuoteThread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.1.11
Copyright © 2012 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright © 2012 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:27 AM.
vBulletin 4.0 skin by CompleteVB
