Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: ¶a(t)·¶r(t)=c²
It is leading us to an understanding of the magnetic vector potential for cold fusion deriving energy from the vacuum.
Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: ¶a(t)·¶r(t)=c²
Or till the sea giving up its deads as the coldest giving up its warmest. The problem is what would be colder than absolute zero?
Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: ¶a(t)·¶r(t)=c²
Prehaps our understanding of absolute zero is wrong!
At this point of absolute zero all atomic movement is
supposed to cease? That only accounts for physical
matter,what about ETHERIC matter? If and when this is understood,there will need to be much recalculation
to be done.
regards michael.
Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
reveal herself?
"Science is organized knowledge. Wisdom is organized life"
"Happiness is not an ideal of reason, but of imagination."
Immanuel Kant
Then why don't we just say negative infinity. But in a sieve of Diophantus, the smallest whole number is 0, the next smallest is 2 not 1, the 3rd is 3, then 4, then 5, then 6, then 7, to positive infinity. Any group of four numbers forming a 2 by 2 matrix has its inverse as multiples of Hadamard matrices of maybe just two irreducible fundamental matrices.
Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: ¶a(t)·¶r(t)=c²
With out consideration for originality...absolute zero as a quanitity can only be regarded as combination of forces of both observation and space-time. Cleary we can debate whether it is more complicated than simply using a thermometer. What are we really trying to measure...what happens when all matter stops moving? Wouldn't that cease to be a quantity?
An original thought would be that absolute zero is square of energy since energy and mass are equivalent. But the square of total energy is the sum of square of momentum tensor energy and square of Einstein's energy.Originally Posted by theunify
Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: ¶a(t)·¶r(t)=c²
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)