Cabibbo mixing angle

[AntonioLao]

The Cabibbo angle is experimentally well established, but its origin remains a mystery (reference: Martinus Veltman – Facts and Mysteries in Elementary Particle Physics, Page 104, World Scientific Publishing, 2003. There is no mathematical explanation why its value is fixed at 12.7°. However, this prediction agrees with the experimental results for the probability transition of an up quark to a down quark in neutron decays. Therefore, it must be considered for the ideal cold fusion reaction of D + D ® Helium-4 + energy or equivalently, the quarks reaction is 3u3d + 3u3d ® 6u6d + energy. In spacetime charges reaction it is given by 3(5H+1H-) + 3(1H+3H-) + 3(5H+1H-) + 3(1H+3H-) ® 6(5H+1H-) + 6(1H+3H-) + energy.

The up quark in spacetime charge lattice structure forms an octahedral geometry while the down quark forms a tetrahedral geometry. It can be demonstrated by solving two simultaneous equations that the scalar coefficient of H- is approximately twice that of H+ for the proton-neutron spacetime charge lattices. Spherical approximations and using the inverse square law of force would then indicate that H+ is a sphere approximately half the radius of H-. Consequently, the 5H+1H- form an isosceles triangle where and when the tangent points of the spheres are connected. For the radii ratio of 1:2.02, the two equal base angles each have a value of 53.09°. On the other hand, the 1H+3H- forms an isosceles triangle with one base angle equal to 65.99° and 65.99 – 53.09 = 12.9° within 10% error of the experimental value 12.7°.

[Cubola Zaruka]

The sum of the cabbibo mixing angle and the solar neutrino mixing angle is 45 degrees. The pattern mentioned above is fascinating, but the 0.1 degree difference in angles is annoying, unless the measurements have not been taken very accurately and the actual values are exactly identical. There are many parameters that seem to be arbitrary, though a small change in them would make the universe inhospitable to life.

[SB_UK]

The up quark in spacetime charge lattice structure forms an octahedral geometry while the down quark forms a tetrahedral geometry.

Does 8 + 4 = 12 ?

[SB_UK]

ps

Does

'Pair production is an important photon interaction process at high energies.'

mean that
~s1,2~

gamma ray + energy -> electron-positron pair?

- because if it does -
then isn't that really quite important?

The world of fundamental particles born through the carrying capacity of a unit of space being breached -
- and a local evolutionary event being required in order to handle the excess energy

- kinda

~ == (o)(o) + energy
->-
(O)(O) + energy
->- evolutionary event ->-
(..O..)(..O..)
...etc...

The novel emergent structure occupies ^2 space(-time matrix) as previously -

- evolution by order.