art of lattice fusion

[AntonioLao]

Cold fusion according to Fleischmann and Pons (FP) described in p81 of Peat’s ‘Cold Fusion: The Making of a Scientific Controversy’ is deuterium plus deuterium equal Helium-4 plus energy (D+D®He+energy). They considered this as a ‘radiationless’ form of energy production. However, in the subnuclear domain of quarks and gluons and deeper still into the infinitesimal domain of quantum space-time, lattice fusion of space-time charges are truly temperature independent but at most only density dependent. This space-time charge density is inversely proportional to the lattice dimensions multiples of Planck length. As a science of course it must be supported by experiments. As an art it can simply be supported by dynamic geometries and plausible logical arguments based on ratio and proportions of rational quantities where and when the topological non-Euclidean structures of the small pictures are used to stitch the tapestries of the Euclidean big pictures. This is more critical if they are one-sided Möbius topologies.

At the outset, it is necessary to state without proof that there are two basic units of space-time charges: H+ and H-. In a physico-mathematical sense, they are simply symmetric Hadamard matrices representing the squares of energy. Pure mathematics can easily show that these matrices are embedded in a sieve of Diophantus. These premises replace gluons by eight directional invariance properties: RUF, RUB, RDF, RDB, LUF, LUB, LDF, and LDB where R is right, L is left, U is up, D is down, F is forward, and B is backward. Odd multiples of H+ and H- form fermions. Even multiples form bosons. Varying matrix orders relate to varying physical mass while (1/6) multiples of sieve matrix inverses give the space-time charge value of H+ as (+1/6) and (-1/6) for H- independent of the matrix order. At the least this help explained the relativistic invariance of electric charge for all elementary particles. The surrounding space-time charges of the quantum vacuum are grouped into either odd H+ even H- or even H+ odd H-. The odd lattices of the vacuum allow the relative motions of the even lattices. Absolute stability is achieved for all 8H multiples: proton, electron, and photon. The FP process implies four 38H deuterium lattices fused into the noble stability 152H lattice of helium gas. However, theory allows energy loans from the vacuum multiples of 12H lattices. The energy loan sequence is given by 2, 5, 8, 11, 14, 17, 20, 23, 26, 29… 3 increments between steps. On the other hand, 19 molecules of hydrogen gas by lattice fusion produce 6 helium gas molecules.

[mkirkpatrick]

Life as it is expressed in manifold ways is in a way fusion,
life is basically energy,and this energy is limitless and boundless,yet,for a singular expression of it.like say,you,
it coheres to a pattern that permits this expression,just
enough energy to unfold its limitless potential,sequence,by
sequence,as it grows upwards through an evolutionary
arc.

regards michael.

[Meem]

I hardly understand a word of it, and at the time, it makes perfect sense.

[polarmedium]

Keep going.

[polarmedium]

It's amazing.

[AntonioLao]

Life as it is expressed in manifold ways is in a way fusion,

In physics, life is simply defined as energy divided by the square of light speed. Einstein discovered this in 1905. This would imply division or separation (fission) instead of fusion. I can't understand why nuclear fission destroys life?

[mkirkpatrick]

In physics, life is simply defined as energy divided by the square of light speed. Einstein discovered this in 1905. This would imply division or separation (fission) instead of fusion. I can't understand why nuclear fission destroys life?

It does not Antonio,life is eternal,such is its nature,its
outer shell may decay or be atomised,but the life energy
remains,as we do when we die and discard our physical
body and then use our etheric one.


regards michael.

[AntonioLao]

My guess is that you are implying spiritual life as everlasting while I'm talking about physical life made of atoms without discussing a theory of the existence of the soul. All current theories of the existence of the soul are based on religious faith not scientific evidence. My theory of the soul is just square of energy.

[SteveA]

In physics, life is simply defined as energy divided by the square of light speed. Einstein discovered this in 1905. This would imply division or separation (fission) instead of fusion. I can't understand why nuclear fission destroys life?

Here's something to consider - what properties you see of the universe are in many ways inverses/compliments etc. of the properties of yourself.

For example, a red apple, is in many ways not red - it reflects red light, hence you're seeing specifically what the apple is not - the red you see is specifically a property you can detect, a "letter of the perceptual alphabet". Or if you are small, things appear larger and visa versa - there is no specific size with respect to the universe as it could be atom in some "larger" universe or atoms themselves could be universes, so whatever size it is in a relative sense would just be the "normal" size for it.

If we considered the evolution of a wavefunction over time, there cannot solely be a wavefunction that moves forward in time at the same rate but instead there must be wavefunctions that move, at least in a relative sense, backwards in time in order that we could predict what will occur in the future evolution of a wavefunction.

If we write the wavefunction in terms of matrix multiplication, then an understanding of the wavefunction is similar to computing a root or inverse of this multiplication.

To generalize upon this, any deterministic system that can be shown to evolve through various predeterminable states over time is learned by post analysis of such observations which requires the construction of the inverse causatory pathway and not just a following of the effect side.

This also happens to require that all such deterministic mappings are 1 to 1 for every possible state, and that no information compression occurs along the way, otherwise when we try to backtrack and prove what causes what we have uncertainty and more than a single cause can result in the same observed effect.

So if you denote time as some progression in a positive direction along a dimension, then predictive knowledge is seen as a backtracking from the future.

Now consider something else as well, if we unified all these systems including learning to be solely forward, then we have another possibility - for closed/finite deterministic systems (I don't think you can truly have any other form), we can cycle through the finite set and return to a point before (on the next cycle) the next occurance of the event. In this case we can predict, upon the assumption that the system is closed and finite (ultimately this appears paradoxical and impossible, though we could have a diminishing "density" or influence of unknowns relative to a growing past/inertia) that events will occur again and this way we could make a prediction via. memory as finite/closed cycles of past experiences.

We'd still be computing the equivalent of a root though, but it would be similar to determining:

X^(t+n)=X^t

And then predicting that the wavelength of this system is n, because the observation recurs over a distance of n units of time.

Of course there are many ways of representing this in terms of a physical resonance, primes, roots, points of convergence or attractors in a chaotic field and possibly similarly as atomic orbitals and gravitational fields etc.

[AntonioLao]

The principle of superposition allows forward and retarded potentials generated from eigenvalues of wavefunctions as energy quanta. But the same cannot be said for physical mass. The problem might be caused by time parameterization instead of spacetime quantization. As squares of energy spacetime quanta can describe both charge and mass making the wavefunctions unnecessary.