absolute real unity

[AntonioLao]

In the classical theory of electromagnetism absolute real unity appeared as the product of four scalar quantities: the absolute value of the group velocity, the absolute value of the phase velocity, the absolute permittivity of the false vacuum, and the constant permeability of the false vacuum. The reason permeability is not absolute is its dependence to the empirical fact that magnetic monopoles cannot be isolated at low energy regimes. Many scientific investigators hope that at extremely high energies magnetic monopoles can easily be isolated which made them comparable to the quest of the scalar Higgs boson currently being done at CERN. However, the crux of the matter is that there is no viable theory about the reality of magnetic monopoles except for the fact on the account of symmetry, they must exist. This symmetry is embedded in Maxwell’s equations for electromagnetic waves propagation. However, relative permeability is a dimensionless quantity defined as the ratio of magnetic flux density over the external magnetic field strength divided by the constant permeability of the false vacuum. This constant is commonly called the magnetic constant while the absolute permittivity of the false vacuum is commonly called the electric constant. Therefore, absolute real unity is the product of two constants and two variables (absolute varying values of group and phase velocity).
Separately, as they are usually understood, the product of absolute values of group and phase velocity is equal to the square of false vacuum lightspeed while the product of the electric constant and the magnetic constant is the reciprocal of the square of false vacuum lightspeed. The joint product of these two products is absolute real unity since the product of a quantity by its reciprocal always equal to the multiplicative identity. Although infinitesimally local absolute values of phase velocity can exceed the false vacuum lightspeed, at this local domain the absolute value of the group velocity approaches zero such that their product remains equal to false vacuum lightspeed. Nonetheless, the transfers of information and energy with or without dispersion can never exceed false vacuum lightspeed. This absolute real unity provides the normalized domain for the theory of probability. It gives exactly zero probability for the existence of magnetic monopoles implying that physical reality of the space-time quantization is a doubly unified magnetic helicities or magnetic dipolarities representing one unit squares of zero-point energies.

[mkirkpatrick]

Within the absolute lies absolute unity,in relativity lies chaos.



regards michael.

[AntonioLao]

But a theory of complexity asserts that absolute order arise out of relative chaos and absolute chaos does not exist.

[SteveA]

But a theory of complexity asserts that absolute order arise out of relative chaos and absolute chaos does not exist.

Sounds very close to some of my own thoughts - there may be no ideal form of randomness and chaos and order could arise just from picking whether or compare a ruler with itself or something else.

[AntonioLao]

Looking at a chaotic or random fractal landscape I can't see the order of the microscopic structured patterns of symmetry and reversibility. Analogous to seeing the forest from the single trees.

[SteveA]

Looking at a chaotic or random fractal landscape I can't see the order of the microscopic structured patterns of symmetry and reversibility. Analogous to seeing the forest from the single trees.

I see this as sort of a progression (this is a bit vague though, and there are lots of other details that can be added) that might be considered in terms of the visibility of properties of a system (if you can't see a property then things separated by that property appear superimposed as a single thing and they appear to intersect, or fold back on themself in a space, whereas they're fundamentally all unique and connected by a timeline for an observer):

If we had a perfect memory of time, everything would lie perfectly separated in a line similar to quantum units of seperation.

If we have a period feature masked in these, then they fold back periodically and we have orbits or phases and these can appear as fractal symmetry.

If we have multiple periods involved, we can find the relatively prime components mask things in complex ways over time and this appears very chaotic. So, from my perspective, if I had to put a hard definition on what the specific properties are of a chaotic system, it would be that we have an interleaved fractality within a space (this is of course made from a position of lower information context and with the appear of superpositions).

Basically, we're just moving toward systems with more compressed forms of information. "Randomness" can be interpreted in two ways in my opinion - as seen from a lower information system, it is unpredictable, but if it is still deterministic on some scale, then it's not an "ideal" randomness, but simply extreme chaos that's unpredictable from a limited perspective.

If there exists something for which no future information allows for prediction of any further of its components, then that would be something that might be considered truly non-deterministic (at least subjectively). Though I'm not certain if there's anything that could really be said about it (it appears a paradox to try to describe any properties regarding such a thing).

I assume existence could contain such a thing, but simultaineously this statement is probably meaningless regarding it ... don't know. But at least such an ideal randomness appear impossible to experience or observe or communicate about because you couldn't satisfy all requirements of randomness with any specific sequence - though maybe multiple parallel sequences could do that, but then I don't know how those could be tied together.

Anyway, that's basically my view of the deterministic/predictable/linear to absolute randomness progression and fractality is the first branch of this "tree" (yes, pun both intended and not intended ... it's just a natural description). You fold the branches together and you get primes and chaos. You compress it to a point and it doesn't appear you can say much about what it is - though it could, as one possibility become a random sample of whatever space the rest of it "grew" from (the space defines what a point is and the dimensions of the space are defined by the orthogonal properties of perceptions observing it ... but ultimately I don't think perfect orthogonality can exist in a single space, that's also part of that paradox and it goes into the multiplication by zero problem as well - you can't rotate a dimension into a point without encountering a discontinuity as the dimension is rescaled, yet constantly infinite in extent until it suddenly "snaps" to a point, which logically appears 'wrong', IMO).

[AntonioLao]

If the infinitesimal domain of 1-dimensional space-time is constraint with at most 8 degrees of freedom as 8 directional invariance properties then local infinitesimal motion can describe Mobius-Hopf-like topologies that also describe fermions and bosons.