Welcome to the ToeQuest.
Results 1 to 3 of 3

Thread: BH mysteries

  1. #1
    Raider of the lost time
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    11,784
    Blog Entries
    10
    Thanks Given
    1,106
    Thanked 1,473x in 1,193 Posts
    Rep Power
    158

    BH mysteries

    The truths about these mysteries become questions many physicists are afraid to ask. Resolving one will more than likely resolved the mystery surrounding the existence of magnetic monopole. The relentless search for a natural perfect symmetry prompted Paul Dirac in 1931 to postulate a separate quantum theory of the magnetic field in addition to his successful quantum theory of the electromagnetic field called quantum electrodynamics (QED) which predicted the existence of antimatter. On the other hand, a quantum theory of the electric field is a foregone conclusion since Benjamin Franklin flew his kite into the thunderstorm in 1752 inventing the first lightning rod and Sir J. J. Thomson playing with his cathode rays tubes in 1897 trapping the elusive existence of the electrons. The theory of electricity is now well established.

    However, in the theory of magnetism, the magnetic flux density is usually symbolized with the bold capital letter B while the magnetic field strength is usually symbolized with the bold capital letter H. These signify that both physical quantities are called vectors (having both properties of magnitude and direction). Unfortunately, vectors can be categorized further into axial vectors and polar vectors. By the primary rule of quantum category, natural transformations only exist for objects of the same type. It happens that B is classified as an axial vector while H is classified as a polar vector. But by breaking the rule often there can only be forced artificial (human-made) transformations between B and H which completely disregard why but not how things work. Surprisingly, the forced unnatural transformation is given by H=B/m where m is the permeability of the medium. In an effort to gain perfect mathematical symmetry, Maxwell made the first forced entry by inserting his displacement current into his differential equations. Unfortunately, doing so only established the constant speed of electromagnetic waves but not why time rate of change of axial vectors is equal to the space rate of change of polar vectors, vice versa. Maxwell’s equations hide subtle unnatural transformations not even later tensors could erase. From bad to badder, Einstein did not realized that his successful principle of equivalence completely ignored the directional property that inertial force is really a polar vector while the gravitational force is really an axial vector. However, macroscopic mass disparity was able to provide a classical forced artificial transformation thus creating a second BH mystery of black holes. From badder to worst, the theory of gauge invariance successful for describing elementary particles of the Standard Model ignored the fact that the vector potential created the third butt hole mystery demanding renormalization to force entry unnatural transformations between pseudoscalars and pseudovectors. It seems that the general consensus of the practical scientific attitude is ‘as long as it works, who cares why it works.’ This lack of a true scientific conscience is prevalent throughout the history of science and technology.
    Time independence: [∂E(g)]˛=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c˛

  2. #2
    8th degree Black Belt
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    1,213
    Thanks Given
    152
    Thanked 130x in 108 Posts
    Rep Power
    34

    Re: BH mysteries

    Did you just say butt hole?


    sally.

  3. #3
    Raider of the lost time
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    11,784
    Blog Entries
    10
    Thanks Given
    1,106
    Thanked 1,473x in 1,193 Posts
    Rep Power
    158

    Re: BH mysteries

    Yes. I did out of frustrations working with renormalization.
    Time independence: [∂E(g)]˛=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c˛

 

 

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Back to top