Welcome to the ToeQuest.
Results 1 to 5 of 5
  1. #1
    Raider of the lost time
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    11,784
    Blog Entries
    10
    Thanks Given
    1,106
    Thanked 1,473x in 1,193 Posts
    Rep Power
    158

    light up to vacuum


    The proportional connection between energy and the space-time continuum is the speed of light such that the space-time continuum (S) is the product of lightspeed (c) and the energy (E): S=cE. The vacuum as the totality of the space-time continuum is capable of infinitesimal matter and energy interactions. These are the quantum vacuum fluctuations. The probability of vacuum direct interaction with energy is v/c where (v) is the speed or rate of space-time displacement of the vacuum. The probability of the vacuum interaction with matter is v/c where the (v) is now the absolute value of the linear velocity of matter. Special relativity had already established the probability of energy interaction with matter as v/c where the (v) is the same absolute value of the linear velocity of matter. There seem to be three distinct types of powers of speed: v, v, and v. However, their distinctions never violate the following three simple inequalities: v<c, v<c, and v<c everywhere and everywhen in the entire universe.

    The reciprocals of these probabilities would then define the rate of change of state transformations between vacuum and energy, between vacuum and matter, and between energy and matter. The rate of energy-matter transformation is derived from Einstein’s mass-energy equivalence: E=mc such the rate is given as c=E/m. Given a tiny mass, its energy requirement is also tiny such that the ratio of energy to mass remains a constant c. As the speed of the mass increases, the rate of change decreases, and approaches unity. If the rate of change is unity then E=m and mass and energy exchange has equal probability. The rate of change between vacuum and energy normalized to v is c/v given by S/vE while the rate of change between vacuum and matter normalized to v is c/v given by S/vm. As v approaches c, both c/v and c/v approach unity. But as v approaches zero both c/v and c/v approach infinity. However, c/v indicates a linear variation while c/v indicates a cubic variation. The first is a path integral. The second is a volume integral. The variation between energy and matter c/v is a surface integral. These integrals imply Abelian additive, commutative, and associative properties as sums of infinite series expansions.
    Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²

  2. #2
    Grandmaster
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    6,657
    Thanks Given
    836
    Thanked 1,049x in 746 Posts
    Rep Power
    105

    Re: light up to vacuum

    Wouldn't S = cE be true only after spatial inflation? (i.e. the inflation was >c) I also lifted part of your post to my An Idea thread, I hope you don't mind.

    Best,

    Pat

  3. #3
    Raider of the lost time
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    11,784
    Blog Entries
    10
    Thanks Given
    1,106
    Thanked 1,473x in 1,193 Posts
    Rep Power
    158

    Re: light up to vacuum

    Quote Originally Posted by profpat
    be true only after spatial inflation?
    I would say it's true before, now, and after - since it is independence of time. Moreover, it is also independence of space. Therefore it is true here, there, and everywhere.
    Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²

  4. #4
    MJA
    MJA is offline
    9th degree Black Belt
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    1,745
    Thanks Given
    113
    Thanked 154x in 101 Posts
    Rep Power
    40

    Re: light up to vacuum

    A C Squared Rebuttal

    Science uses co-ordinate systems to measure nature, and or light. But to square light such as Einstein did in his famous equation E = MC2 would mean that the co-ordinate system of measure must be transformational or squared equally as well. And if the above statement is true then a 3 or 4 dimensional co-ordinate system (xyz or xyzt) used to measure light would be 9 or 16 dimensions respectfully, and truly there is no such thing. C squared?

    =
    MJA

    PS: an arabian horses should never be named Mo.
    The truth of everything is less than one inch,
    it is only equal and the lion is one.
    One is free when the door is opened,
    education has the key.
    =

  5. #5
    Raider of the lost time
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    11,784
    Blog Entries
    10
    Thanks Given
    1,106
    Thanked 1,473x in 1,193 Posts
    Rep Power
    158

    Re: light up to vacuum

    Quote Originally Posted by MJA
    C Squared Rebuttal
    Wherever and whenever certain quantity is squared in the logic of mathematical modeling, it simply means that a two dimensional configuration space is intended for discussing a theory of surfaces. The intersection of two surfaces is that of a 3D space curve and the closure of a surface is that of a volume giving an inner and an outer region. But using Mobius topology, there is no requirement for a closed volume or a two-sided surface. 2D Mobius topology is a one-sided surface with orientable closed curves that linked together to form a quantum of 4D space-time.
    Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²

 

 

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Back to top