odd universe

[AntonioLao]

If the universe is singular then it is truly an odd universe. Odd universe implies a big bang origin at time zero and anything before the big bang has no physical meaning. On the other hand, if the universe is nonsingular then there exists a dual inverse, or reciprocating simultaneously coexisting antiuniverse. However, its simultaneous coexistence cannot be proven completely by experiments but can only be totally demonstrated by mathematical logic.

The experimental discoveries of antiparticles are all the direct evidence needed to show that this antiparallel universe of antimatter does exist. The fact that this antiuniverse does not take parts creating real stars and real galaxies is a further indirect proof of its large scale physical detachment. Nonetheless, the existence of quantum vacuum fluctuations of zero-point energies is the other convincing indirect proof of the existence of an antiparallel universe. These quantum vacuum fluctuations provide the infinitesimally local but not the large scale global interconnections between these two antiparallel universes. The fact that the real universal expansion is accelerating implies the virtual universal contraction is decelerating. These two opposite primary forces create the true reality of the space-time continuum as the derivatives of the simplest rational functions: XY = ±K for both positive and negative values of the proportionality constant of variation which are all general covariance to the inverse square law of gravity, electrostatics, and magnetostatics. One odd universe plus another odd universe creates an even dual universe of nothing (vacuum). On the other hand, one odd universe by itself could create something out of first nothing. Conversely, something plus something again creates second nothing. This second nothing is simply the underlying dynamic equilibrium of everything.

[theunify]

Perhaps we are forgetting the responsibility of scientists not to hinge their results on one experiment. Antiparticles are but one theoretical concept used to explain unknown phenomena, therefore we are really putting ourselves out there to say that because of the fact no better solution has come forward that we must assume it is never going to be solved and therefore a partial solution is deemed a full solution.

I would be wary of proving this fact, just as any famous scientist has been wary of denying better solutions exist to their work, sometimes radically better solutions.

~theunify

...The experimental discoveries of antiparticles are all the direct evidence needed to show that this antiparallel universe of antimatter does exist. ......

[AntonioLao]

to hinge their results on one experiment

Actually, scientist based the results on multiple experiments in order to give them statistical distribution parameters of mean, variance, and standard deviation as error analysis and confidence interval hypothesis testings. All these belong to the branch of applied mathematical science called statistical analysis.

[theunify]

Antonio I am not debating the semantics of anti-particles; I am debating the fact that you base an entire theory on their existance, again I am not stating anti-particle do not exist.

Actually, scientist based the results on multiple experiments in order to give them statistical distribution parameters of mean, variance, and standard deviation as error analysis and confidence interval hypothesis testings. All these belong to the branch of applied mathematical science called statistical analysis.

~theunify

[AntonioLao]

I am debating the fact that you base an entire theory on their existance

Not antiparticles by themselves but also ordinary particles. It's a theory of nature's dichotomy of fundamental duality similar to yin and yang in Eastern mysticism.

[theunify]

Not antiparticles by themselves but also ordinary particles. It's a theory of nature's dichotomy of fundamental duality similar to yin and yang in Eastern mysticism.

Antonio,

That's right, I like that scientific approach, but I am not/do not quite remember what is odd about this?


~theunify

[AntonioLao]

but I am not/do not quite remember what is odd about this?

Refering to the title, it is actually made to argue the opposite that the universe is not odd at all but dual.