living continuums

[AntonioLao]

There are basically three contenders of physical space-time continuum. The first is the Euclidean one parallel continuum. The second is the Riemannian spherical positive cuvature no parallel continuum. The third is the Bolyai-Gauss-Lobachevsky hyperbolic negative curvature infinite parallel continuum. The first was used by Newton to formulate his law of universal gravitation. The second was used by Einstein to imporve the law of universal gravitation. However, the third can now be used to synthesize both Einstein’s general theory of relativity and the quantum nature of physical reality as describe by quantum mechanics.

Consequently, there are also various contenders of this hopefully final synthesis: superstring theories, loop quantum gravity, twistor theory, M-theory, p-brane, and many more. Unfortunately, none of these truly uses the idea of hyperbolic topology of infinite parallels. A common sense idea is the billions of human lives on planet Earth that are living parallel lives but are unknown of each other existence. Realistically, for personal intersection or interception, it is impossible for a single person in one lifetime to learn all the languages, all the customs, and all the first and last name of everyone. That is to say, impossible to have a direct personal contact of actually touching someone, up close and personal. Although the human race is truly a living continuum, it comprises the quantum nature represented by each country as a nation. Surprisingly, the United Nations, as of June 2006, is composed of merely 192 member nations. Moreover, these are not created equal even in a narrowest economic sense. On the other hand, the infinite number of quantum of the space-time continuum are composed of equal magnitude primary forces of equal numbers of opposite directions of H-pluses and H-minuses analogous to equal numbers of living men and women which global census deems impossible. Countable odd and even groupings of these space-time charges created the limited number of no more than 40 distinct elementary particles of higher energy physics while at low energy physics there are no more than 120 chemical element atoms (both natural and artificial).

[labelwench]

A common sense idea is the billions of human lives on planet Earth that are living parallel lives but are unknown of each other existence. Realistically, for personal intersection or interception, it is impossible for a single person in one lifetime to learn all the languages, all the customs, and all the first and last name of everyone. That is to say, impossible to have a direct personal contact of actually touching someone, up close and personal. Originally posted by AntonioLao.

Interesting then, that in addition to pondering the origins of self and universe, a great number of people are seeking even one other being with whom they resonate on a personal level.

We seem to vibrate at different frequencies, and despite the number and diversity of 'others', it is rare that two minds meet that are of similar accord.

The diversity must be an important part of the larger picture, IMO.

[AntonioLao]

it is rare that two minds meet that are of similar accord.

The differences in space and time. We could be at the same time but different space. And those that were at the same space existed at different time. Stephen Hawkings is now sitting on the same chair that Isaac Newton sat on.

[austintorn@aol.com]

But he mostly sits in a wheelchair.

[AntonioLao]

You got me. Maybe it was Newton's chair improvised with computerized wheels and electronic sensors that respond to the winkings of one's eyelid or the nerve impulse of one's thought?