The rational function = - implies that wherever and whenever = 0 then = 0, vice versa. If and represent the mass values of two gravitating objects then if one mass is zero the other is automatically zero. Likewise, if and represent the energy values of two interacting particles then if one energy is zero the other is automatically zero. This unique physical property is usually known as quantum entanglement implied by Bell’s theorem, Bell’s inequalities, and demonstrated by the Aspect experiment. Consequently, the real implication of quantum entanglement is disproving the EPR thought experiment. On the other hand, the rational function = ± implies that if =0 then = ± infinity, vice versa. Solving both simultaneously gave the one and only solution that =0 and that = if and only if both are zeros.
The ultimate question is how can these be applied for formulating a physical theory? In this sense, the theory must answer the question why zero mass exists at all and why a quantum of mass is conceptually impossible. On the contrary, if the a priori is unit mass then both = - and = ± can be solved with infinitely many possible sets of solution (, , ) which neither , nor , nor can ever take the value of zero. If mass is 1 then mass is ½ and is ½. If mass is 1000000 then mass is 1000000/1000001 and is 1000000000000000/1000001. approaches positive infinity if approaches positive unity from the left and approaches negative unity from the top. approaches negative infinity if approaches positive unity from the right and approaches negative unity from the bottom. Furthermore, if charge is positive two then charge is negative two and is negative four, giving the only solution for zero charge since +=0.


LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks
Reply With Quote

