Welcome to the ToeQuest.
Results 1 to 3 of 3

Thread: implied zero

  1. #1
    Raider of the lost time
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    11,784
    Blog Entries
    10
    Thanks Given
    1,106
    Thanked 1,474x in 1,194 Posts
    Rep Power
    158

    implied zero

    The rational function ���� = ��-�� implies that wherever and whenever �� = 0 then �� = 0, vice versa. If �� and �� represent the mass values of two gravitating objects then if one mass is zero the other is automatically zero. Likewise, if �� and �� represent the energy values of two interacting particles then if one energy is zero the other is automatically zero. This unique physical property is usually known as quantum entanglement implied by Bell’s theorem, Bell’s inequalities, and demonstrated by the Aspect experiment. Consequently, the real implication of quantum entanglement is disproving the EPR thought experiment. On the other hand, the rational function ���� = ±�� implies that if ��=0 then �� = ± infinity, vice versa. Solving both simultaneously gave the one and only solution that ��=0 and that ��=�� if and only if both are zeros.

    The ultimate question is how can these be applied for formulating a physical theory? In this sense, the theory must answer the question why zero mass exists at all and why a quantum of mass is conceptually impossible. On the contrary, if the a priori is unit mass then both ���� = ��-�� and ���� = ±�� can be solved with infinitely many possible sets of solution (��, ��, ��) which neither ��, nor ��, nor �� can ever take the value of zero. If mass �� is 1 then mass �� is ½ and �� is ½. If mass �� is 1000000 then mass �� is 1000000/1000001 and �� is 1000000000000000/1000001. �� approaches positive infinity if �� approaches positive unity from the left and �� approaches negative unity from the top. �� approaches negative infinity if �� approaches positive unity from the right and �� approaches negative unity from the bottom. Furthermore, if charge �� is positive two then charge �� is negative two and �� is negative four, giving the only solution for zero charge since ��+��=0.
    Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²

  2. #2
    Grandmaster
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    11,904
    Blog Entries
    28
    Thanks Given
    1,783
    Thanked 3,989x in 2,767 Posts
    Rep Power
    181

    Awards Showcase

    Re: implied zero

    This raises too many questions.

  3. #3
    Raider of the lost time
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    11,784
    Blog Entries
    10
    Thanks Given
    1,106
    Thanked 1,474x in 1,194 Posts
    Rep Power
    158

    Re: implied zero

    Nobody will ask any question if someone else mistakenly deposited 1 followed by 000000000000 dollars into one's bank account.
    Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²

 

 

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Back to top