directed energy

[AntonioLao]

In physics, force is best defined as the agent of change and energy is best defined as the measure of this change. In general, change is synonymous with the universal concept of motion. Since there are different forms of motion, energy is measured also in many different ways. Some these measures are given as heat, potential, kinetic, electric, magnetic, electromagnetic, gravitational, nuclear, atomic, molecular, frictional, chemical, wind, geothermal, hydrostatic, radiative, conductive, and convective. That is to say for every defined agent of force, there is a corresponding measure of energy. Although each distinct measure of energy must be given as a scalar quantity of the same dimensional unit and basically convertible between themselves, if the measured energy is derived from the quantum vacuum of space-time charges as the interactions of infinitesimal primary forces then this measurement is properly defined as the measure of directed energy, which at the fundamental level of physical reality can be both positive and negative. As already mentioned earlier, positive energy is useful energy, while negative energy is useless energy. This useless energy is disguised as the quantum vacuum fluctuations of zero-point energies, whose quanta are defined as virtual particles of the different types of quantum fields.

Mathematically speaking, a directional quantity is equivalent to a vector quantity, a physical quantity having both attributes of magnitude and direction. Consequentially, the computational methodology of directed physical quantities is equivalent to the mathematics of wave interference as clearly described in The Feynman Lectures on Physics, Chapter I, Volume III, CIT, Addison Wesley, 1965. This mathematical formalism relies on the triangular inequality and the cosine law of circular functions, which are applicable to complex imaginary analysis, points in the infinitely dimensional Euclidean geometry, as well as multi-dimensional linear vector spaces similar to the Hilbert spaces used in quantum mechanics. Obviously, the mathematics of quantized wave interference is also equivalent to the mathematics of squares of energy: ��²=��₁×��₁×��₂×��₂ such that ��²≤��₁²+��₂² where ��₁ and ��₂ are defined primary thermal forces and ��₁ and ��₂ are the local infinitesimal metrics.

[Bogie]

Thank you Antonio. Strangely enough I am at the <http://maps.google.com/maps/ms?hl=en...ad99d16a8eb815> Maple Pavilion today working on a post for my thread but it has some similarities to the discussion of vacuum energy. The cosmological constant is sometimes referred to as vacuum energy density or negative energy density in science theory (see Sean Carroll http://preposterousuniverse.com/writings/encyc/).

That is why I find your handling of this topic helpful. I can't contribute to the science where your apply yourself. I apply myself in speculation because science doesn't yet include the new physics that my version of cosmology requires. That means that I am way out of the ball game that you are playing in but you are in my ballgame . I should be getting a new post ready for my thread so thanks for addressing this topic. I'll look for you on your next online session.

[labelwench]

That is to say for every defined agent of force, there is a corresponding measure of energy.
Originally posted by AntonioLao

The human being is a composite of energy measures, among them heat, potential, kinetic, electromagnetic, and chemical.

Though not in the sense you suggest, humans are, however, directed energy and agents of change, in a manner of speaking.

[AntonioLao]

The cosmological constant is sometimes referred to as vacuum energy density or negative energy density The cosmological constant is sometimes referred to as vacuum energy density or negative energy density

Thanks for this reference to the cosmological constant. I'll look into it for a possible connection to general theory of relativity.

humans are, however, directed energy and agents of change

I can only hope that it is directed to constructive interference instead of destructive interference.

[labelwench]

I can only hope that it is directed to constructive interference instead of destructive interference.
Originally posted by AntonioLao

There are times when directed destruction is required prior the constructive directed.

All activity, or energy in motion, interferes with other energies, does it not?

Is this not the cause of resistance?

Carefully orchestrated interference would seem to be the pattern, to maintain balance between the constructive and destructive energies, as energy must be a 'closed system entity' if it is neither created or destroyed.

(Caution: Experiment in progress.)

[AntonioLao]

directed destruction is required prior the constructive directed

Is this the reason why preceding generation of people dies in order for succeeding generation to live?

[labelwench]

Is this the reason why preceding generation of people dies in order for succeeding generation to live?

Too cute, Antonio. Do you think that I am Mother Nature to answer such a question?

It does raise an interesting thought in my mind, however.

If energy can neither be created or destroyed, it can, observably by redistributed.

As we populate beyond the ability of the planet to feed, water, cloth and shelter us all, the balance of energy shifts to emergent human beings and is removed from all those other living resources that sustain life, in all of it's forms.

When too much energy is converted to hemoglobin instead of to chlorophyll, we have an unsustainable system.

Nature will react to restore balance, IMO, and if we wish to exercise any choice in the outcome, it should have embarked long ago. At this point, I would suggest we can only prioritize and practice harm reduction.

Just my opinion, and I may be far off the mark. Truly, I would like to be wrong on this one......

[AntonioLao]

If energy can neither be created or destroyed, it can, observably by redistributed.

In a quantum of theory of space-time charges, it is the same as saying there are equal numbers of H-pluses and H-minuses. Each H representing the square of energy

[Bogie]

Thanks for this reference to the cosmological constant. I'll look into it for a possible connection to general theory of relativity.

I can only hope that it is directed to constructive interference instead of destructive interference.

Hi Antonio. When I consider the vacuum, I think of it in terms of relative energy density. A perfect vacuum is space with zero energy density. That empty space would be quickly filled if you believe the old saying, "nature abhors a vacuum". That saying pertains to here on Earth where we can't produce a perfect vacuum. But do you think that there are places in space where a perfect vacuum exists? And wouldn't that space also be filled from the surrounding environment? Would you be agreeable to make a statement about the concept of relative vacuum described by the relative energy density in the involved space? The lower the energy density per unit of space, the greater the relative vacuum.

[AntonioLao]

I think of it in terms of relative energy density

Your intuitive deduction serves you right since yesterday I happened to come across Stefan-Boltzmann law of blackbody radiation which is based on the existence of relative radiation pressure and that it is only a third of the total energy density of radiation. Now, I'm using the same general covariance to show that the relative vacuum radiation pressure holds the same mathematical expression. See new thread which I'm going to post tomorrow.