Abelian Yang-Mills gauge

[AntonioLao]

The non-Abelian Yang-Mills gauge theory was discovered in 1954. With it holds much of the success of modern gauge theories, for example, both QED and QCD. However, by ignoring the findings of superstring theories for the moment, investigators have now admitted that a gauge theory for the quantum of the gravitational field cannot be formulated using non-Abelian Yang-Mills gauge invariance. On the other hand, a first question can be posted to this forum: Can an Abelian Yang-Mills gauge theory be able to formulate a quantum theory of the gravitational field? This will now be presented for discussion.

At the outset it is agreed by many investigators that the standard model of the elementary particles of high energy physics cannot be accepted completely and without question unless the scalar spin zero Higgs boson can be discovered by the LHC at CERN. Now, interestingly, the second question is whether an Abelian Yang-Mills gauge theory would jeopardize the search for this boson to the extent that it can be postulated of its nonexistence and proven by plausible mathematics thus making the search for the Higgs boson into a null experiment analogous to the search of the aether frame near the end of the 19th century. Chronologically, the null experiment of the aether frame was instrumental for the discovery of special relativity. The same would not be true if an Abelian Yang-Mills gauge theory predicted the nonexistence of the Higgs boson. Reports at CERN indicated that data collection at the TeV thresholds is completed and ready for the initial data analyses which might take several years, say, the next 15 years. However, if Abelian Yang-Mills gauge theory can be formulated by the end of this year then it can save many years of wasted time and resources for searching what truly is a ghost particle, an idea first introduced by Feynman in 1963. It is a fictitious particle added during the calculations of a theory but vanished after the calculations is done, where and when its interaction probability is reduced to exactly zero.

[labelwench]

The non-Abelian Yang-Mills gauge theory was discovered in 1954. With it holds much of the success of modern gauge theories, for example, both QED and QCD. However, by ignoring the findings of superstring theories for the moment, investigators have now admitted that a gauge theory for the quantum of the gravitational field cannot be formulated using non-Abelian Yang-Mills gauge invariance. On the other hand, a first question can be posted to this forum: Can an Abelian Yang-Mills gauge theory be able to formulate a quantum theory of the gravitational field? This will now be presented for discussion.

At the outset it is agreed by many investigators that the standard model of the elementary particles of high energy physics cannot be accepted completely and without question unless the scalar spin zero Higgs boson can be discovered by the LHC at CERN. Now, interestingly, the second question is whether an Abelian Yang-Mills gauge theory would jeopardize the search for this boson to the extent that it can be postulated of its nonexistence and proven by plausible mathematics thus making the search for the Higgs boson into a null experiment analogous to the search of the aether frame near the end of the 19th century. Chronologically, the null experiment of the aether frame was instrumental for the discovery of special relativity. The same would not be true if an Abelian Yang-Mills gauge theory predicted the nonexistence of the Higgs boson. Reports at CERN indicated that data collection at the TeV thresholds is completed and ready for the initial data analyses which might take several years, say, the next 15 years. However, if Abelian Yang-Mills gauge theory can be formulated by the end of this year then it can save many years of wasted time and resources for searching what truly is a ghost particle, an idea first introduced by Feynman in 1963. It is a fictitious particle added during the calculations of a theory but vanished after the calculations is done, where and when its interaction probability is reduced to exactly zero.

As I have stated before, I am not knowledgeable in this field, yet if I have read this correctly, you are hinting that CERN may be an elaborate and expensive waste of time?

[Lloyd Gillespie]

The non-Abelian Yang-Mills gauge theory was discovered in 1954. With it holds much of the success of modern gauge theories, for example, both QED and QCD. However, by ignoring the findings of superstring theories for the moment, investigators have now admitted that a gauge theory for the quantum of the gravitational field cannot be formulated using non-Abelian Yang-Mills gauge invariance. On the other hand, a first question can be posted to this forum: Can an Abelian Yang-Mills gauge theory be able to formulate a quantum theory of the gravitational field? This will now be presented for discussion.

At the outset it is agreed by many investigators that the standard model of the elementary particles of high energy physics cannot be accepted completely and without question unless the scalar spin zero Higgs boson can be discovered by the LHC at CERN. Now, interestingly, the second question is whether an Abelian Yang-Mills gauge theory would jeopardize the search for this boson to the extent that it can be postulated of its nonexistence and proven by plausible mathematics thus making the search for the Higgs boson into a null experiment analogous to the search of the aether frame near the end of the 19th century. Chronologically, the null experiment of the aether frame was instrumental for the discovery of special relativity. The same would not be true if an Abelian Yang-Mills gauge theory predicted the nonexistence of the Higgs boson. Reports at CERN indicated that data collection at the TeV thresholds is completed and ready for the initial data analyses which might take several years, say, the next 15 years. However, if Abelian Yang-Mills gauge theory can be formulated by the end of this year then it can save many years of wasted time and resources for searching what truly is a ghost particle, an idea first introduced by Feynman in 1963. It is a fictitious particle added during the calculations of a theory but vanished after the calculations is done, where and when its interaction probability is reduced to exactly zero.

Antonio, you'll have far more success proving the 'photon's zero mass fallacy...' At least, that gives us a true physics...

The answer's all in Einstein's mirror...

He was looking at his subjective self__He should have turned it to the objective Universe__Different picture...

[AntonioLao]

hinting that CERN may be an elaborate and expensive waste of time

Like any organization, once they are set on doing something it's difficult to turn back. CERN have been successful before, e.g., detecting both charged and neutral currents of the electroweak force. There were several Nobel laureates who depended on CERN's findings. The US had the same vision of finding the Higgs boson and started building the superconducting supercollider in Texas until U. S. Congress stopped the project. CERN is an international organization and many still believe that they can find the Higgs boson. Whether they can or not, 15 years from now much of high energy physics will be revised. There is a reward of 1 million dollars posted by the Clay Mathematical Institute for the first person to formulate a plausible Yang-Mills theory that can solve the mass gap problem. In other words, a physical theory for the origin of mass.

[AntonioLao]

Lloyd, you have missed my points time and time again. I am not trying to prove anything. I am working on a mathematical formulation that can create cold fusion. I am looking for new physics not digging up buried skeletons of dead obsolete physics that present no more mystery to physicists.

[Lloyd Gillespie]

I'm not missing your points Antonio__I keep seeing your logic and math, not conforming to physical reality or the laws of physics...

I'm only pointing it out to you, to get you on a better track...

[AntonioLao]

That is you insisting on old obsolete physics. The new physics I'm searching for remain transparent (at most translucent) at this time and if you said you saw it, it can only be your own reflection of your own preconception or prejudgment.

[Lloyd Gillespie]

Yeah, foundations under houses are outdated too__Ha Antonio...???

I think I'll keep the laws of physics and logic__also the maths as applied logically and physically to reality...

You offer no new ideas__yet, though I do like your little short synopses of maths and physics, when they apply to history and physical reality...

I don't look for the non-existent translucent ghosts__I only look for opaque physical realities__just ever Finer structures of it...

Antonio, your bio states you are a physicist__where did you work as a physicist, how long, and on what...???

P.s.
Here's new physics for you Antonio__The answer is in bio-physics, which clones particle/wave cell structure growth__since present QM doesn't allow particle/wave cloning, at least of protons, quarks, electrons, etc... What is the cloning mechanism of bio-life-physics...??? The only answer is the photon and it's field inter-actions with the existing QM particle/waves and fields...

[AntonioLao]

I consider myself as the new age physicist, making the invisible visible using abstract math. I worked 8 years with the Pentagon as an analyst. If I have to tell you what I do there then I might have to kill you or maybe you would just die from the shocking information.

[Lloyd Gillespie]

Nothing shocks me Antonio, as I also worked for the military and the nuclear industry__even in the hot-zones__containment, that is...

You couldn't shoot me anyway__I got a longer range gun than you...

As to new age physicist__what's that...? Spiritual physics...???

Btw, all math is abstract__but the best works physically grounded...