Welcome to the ToeQuest.
Results 1 to 4 of 4
  1. #1
    Raider of the lost time
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    11,784
    Blog Entries
    10
    Thanks Given
    1,106
    Thanked 1,474x in 1,194 Posts
    Rep Power
    158

    directional calculus

    Save from the need of defining a coordinate system, direction in spacetime can be determined using the ideas of infinitesimal calculus. Two of these ideas are derivative and antiderivative. Together with the theory of infinite series expansion of function, these ideas established some plausible descriptions of the physical world of the macroscopic and microscopic reality with both properties of its internal and external region of the spacetime continuum. Since the definition of derivative and antiderivative is synonymous with differential and integral, the latter can be used interchangeably without any loss of precise and accurate mathematical connotations.

    If the independent variable �� marked the spacetime position of the spot where and when the theoretical treasure trove is found then the time derivative of �� represents the rate of change or speed of its location in a given direction. This direction holds linearly for all future locations of the variable. To change this direction is simply to take the second time derivative properly called linear acceleration. A continuously differentiable manifold would then imply continuous change along a direction while a continuously integrable manifold implies changes in the opposite direction. For example, the continuously differentiable transcendental function ℯⁿ is ℯⁿ. However, its continuously integrable manifold is also ℯⁿ if and only if the integrable constant is set to zero at every step, implying that the infinite series expansion of ℯⁿ with ��-th term given by ��ⁿ/��! has continuous n-derivative given by ��ⁿ⁻¹/(��-1)! and continuous ��-antiderivative given by ��ⁿ⁺¹/(��+1)!. For ��=0 of antiderivative or ��=1of derivative, the infinite series expansion remains the same.
    Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²

  2. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to AntonioLao For This Useful Post:

    Graybeard (11-14-2010), Lloyd Gillespie (11-16-2010)

  3. #2
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    4,896
    Blog Entries
    24
    Thanks Given
    2,967
    Thanked 2,727x in 1,670 Posts
    Rep Power
    92

    Re: directional calculus

    Thanks Antonio ..... for some reason the equations were not visible ... but after reading it I'm sorta glad .... they would have been too distracting, and I needed all the concentration I could muster just to follow the words.

    cool bananas ... greg
    'Blondie says I must hate all Brunettes. I'll try, but if I can't ... I'll love them both'
    ... graffiti on Tavern wall, Pompeii, circa AD 70.

  4. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Graybeard For This Useful Post:

    AntonioLao (11-20-2010), austintorn@aol.com (11-15-2010)

  5. #3
    Grandmaster
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    11,904
    Blog Entries
    28
    Thanks Given
    1,784
    Thanked 3,989x in 2,767 Posts
    Rep Power
    181

    Awards Showcase

    Re: directional calculus

    Yes. me. too; so I'll just say "and then what happened?"

  6. The Following User Says Thank You to austintorn@aol.com For This Useful Post:

    AntonioLao (11-20-2010)

  7. #4
    Raider of the lost time
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    11,784
    Blog Entries
    10
    Thanks Given
    1,106
    Thanked 1,474x in 1,194 Posts
    Rep Power
    158

    Re: directional calculus

    Gentlemen, nowadays, people simply use the scientific graphing calculators to find the nth derivative or antiderivative and taking the directional invariance property of both for granted such that to take the derivative and then followed by the antiderivative of the same function means simply the same as doing nothing at all, that is knotting and then unknotting is same as no knotting.
    Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²

  8. The Following User Says Thank You to AntonioLao For This Useful Post:

    Graybeard (11-20-2010)

 

 

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Back to top