The proximity of personal relationship among many married couples led to increasing rates of divorce as a consequence of lack of personal affinity.
The proximity of personal relationship among many married couples led to increasing rates of divorce as a consequence of lack of personal affinity.
Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: ¶a(t)·¶r(t)=c²
My question is not how close two people can be physically but how close they can be mentally? On the other hand, some people say that we must keep our enemy closer.
Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: ¶a(t)·¶r(t)=c²
Is that equivalent to a heavenly state of being? Total discord is a hellish state of being.
Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: ¶a(t)·¶r(t)=c²
Then I dont get it why theorists are seeking a theory of torn space-time continuum?
Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: ¶a(t)·¶r(t)=c²
A quantum theory of the space-time continuum works well with a Mobius topology. Understanding this topology is crucial to deuteron cold fusion.
Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: ¶a(t)·¶r(t)=c²
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)