Pi7-#31-V= Relativity/consciousness =2

[Rybo]

I haven't posted here at ToE since 2004. Wow! So much water under the bridge since then..

Pi is ratio of relationship between the diameter of a circle --two radials/radii--- and the surrounding circumference.

If the two radials/radii, are not at 180 degrees from each other, then they define a Euclidean arc or V i.e. two vectors.
2D Here and Now

It is my conjecture(?) that one incoming radii/radial and one outgoing radial/radii as two vectors with a V relationship = the minimal degrees of relativity and consciousness, and are directly related to the 31 Great Circles/Polygonals of the regular/symmetrical Icosahedron, as the basis of spacetime gravity ---static representation that is--- and the 3 sets of known bosonic forces.

Pi = 3.14 15 92 65 35 89_7_93 23 84 62 64 33 83 23_7_95 02 88 419_7_16 93 993_7_51 05 82 09_7_49 44 59 230_7_81 64 06 28 62 08 99 86 28 03 48 25 34 2 11 _7_06_7_9

Pi( 13 places ) = 3.14 15 92 65 35 89_7_
..{ 12 sphericals surround a nuclear 13th, in the Vector Equilibrium aka Cubo-octahedron }..

Pi( 13 places )^3 = 31.00 62_7_66 80 29_7_1
..{ does 3rd powering signify a 3rd dimension? }.....

Pi( 12 places ) = 3.14 15 92 65 35 89
Pi( 12 places )^3 = 31.00 62_7_66 802_7_ 63
..{ 3rd powering give us 31( GrCP's ) and 62( radials/radii ) }..

31( prime ) primary, Great Circle-like Polygonal Planes of the Icosahedron( primary )
..{ #31 is prime out to 7 places i.e 33 33 33 + 1 = 7 places

I feel that #7 operates/functions as terminating number of sorts. This is based on numerical sequence of processes in my "Sub-polygonal Hierarchy" thoughts and other things about #7 that make it limiting/like factor eg. 7 colors/areas mapping of torus is maxium plus other things.

In the following 2D spatially(?) unfolding of the 1D( linear ) of Pi, I felt that I saw a waves and voids and suggest the reader compare the below with the waves and voids of the Euclidean and exotic sine-waves that the VE/cubo-octahedron ---aka vector flexor or jitterbug--- will infold and then expand into.

3.1 4 1 5 9 2 6 5 3 5 8 9_7_9 3 2 3 8 4 6 2 6 4 3 3 8 3 2_7_9 5 0 2 8 8 4
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------0-----------
--1-----1---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------2----------------------------2-------------2-------------------2-------------2-------
-------------------------3-----------------3-----3------------------3-3----3-------------------------
------4----------------------------------------------4----------4------------------------------------4
------------5----------5----5-----------------------------------------------------------5-------------
-------------------6------------------------------------6----6----------------------------------------
-------------------------------------7----------------------------------------------7-------------------
------------------------------8--------------------8-----------------------8------------------------8-8
--------------9-------------------9-----9---------------------------------------------9---------------
3.1 4 1 5 9 2 6 5 3 5 8 9_7_9 3 2 3 8 4 6 2 6 4 3 3 8 3 2_7_9 5 0 2 8 8 4

See bottom of page at this following link: Sine-wave Landscape

To be clear with some of the above, I should add, that, the 31 Great Circles total more than just 62 end points( nippions ) and 31( yippions ) as suggested above i.e. the 62 is and abstraction of Pi^3 that is suggestive of a connection between the 3D icosahedron, perhaps

If there is a valid connection then we have a connection of Pi to phi, via the 31 Great Circle/Polygonals of the icosahedron, because, of the icosahedrons 15 golden( phi ) rectangles ---15 GrCP's-- and 12 overlapping golden pentagons.

Rybo

[Bogie]

I haven't posted here at ToE since 2004. Wow! So much water under the bridge since then..

Pi is ratio of relationship between the diameter of a circle --two radials/radii--- and the surrounding circumference.

If the two radials/radii, are not at 180 degrees from each other, then they define a Euclidean arc or V i.e. two vectors.
2D Here and Now

It is my conjecture(?) that one incoming radii/radial and one outgoing radial/radii as two vectors with a V relationship = the minimal degrees of relativity and consciousness, and are directly related to the 31 Great Circles/Polygonals of the regular/symmetrical Icosahedron, as the basis of spacetime gravity ---static representation that is--- and the 3 sets of known bosonic forces.

Pi = 3.14 15 92 65 35 89_7_93 23 84 62 64 33 83 23_7_95 02 88 419_7_16 93 993_7_51 05 82 09_7_49 44 59 230_7_81 64 06 28 62 08 99 86 28 03 48 25 34 2 11 _7_06_7_9

Pi( 13 places ) = 3.14 15 92 65 35 89_7_
..{ 12 sphericals surround a nuclear 13th, in the Vector Equilibrium aka Cubo-octahedron }..

Pi( 13 places )^3 = 31.00 62_7_66 80 29_7_1
..{ does 3rd powering signify a 3rd dimension? }.....

Pi( 12 places ) = 3.14 15 92 65 35 89
Pi( 12 places )^3 = 31.00 62_7_66 802_7_ 63
..{ 3rd powering give us 31( GrCP's ) and 62( radials/radii ) }..

31( prime ) primary, Great Circle-like Polygonal Planes of the Icosahedron( primary )
..{ #31 is prime out to 7 places i.e 33 33 33 + 1 = 7 places

I feel that #7 operates/functions as terminating number of sorts. This is based on numerical sequence of processes in my "Sub-polygonal Hierarchy" thoughts and other things about #7 that make it limiting/like factor eg. 7 colors/areas mapping of torus is maxium plus other things.

In the following 2D spatially(?) unfolding of the 1D( linear ) of Pi, I felt that I saw a waves and voids and suggest the reader compare the below with the waves and voids of the Euclidean and exotic sine-waves that the VE/cubo-octahedron ---aka vector flexor or jitterbug--- will infold and then expand into.

3.1 4 1 5 9 2 6 5 3 5 8 9_7_9 3 2 3 8 4 6 2 6 4 3 3 8 3 2_7_9 5 0 2 8 8 4
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------0-----------
--1-----1---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------2----------------------------2-------------2-------------------2-------------2-------
-------------------------3-----------------3-----3------------------3-3----3-------------------------
------4----------------------------------------------4----------4------------------------------------4
------------5----------5----5-----------------------------------------------------------5-------------
-------------------6------------------------------------6----6----------------------------------------
-------------------------------------7----------------------------------------------7-------------------
------------------------------8--------------------8-----------------------8------------------------8-8
--------------9-------------------9-----9---------------------------------------------9---------------
3.1 4 1 5 9 2 6 5 3 5 8 9_7_9 3 2 3 8 4 6 2 6 4 3 3 8 3 2_7_9 5 0 2 8 8 4

See bottom of page at this following link: Sine-wave Landscape

To be clear with some of the above, I should add, that, the 31 Great Circles total more than just 62 end points( nippions ) and 31( yippions ) as suggested above i.e. the 62 is and abstraction of Pi^3 that is suggestive of a connection between the 3D icosahedron, perhaps

If there is a valid connection then we have a connection of Pi to phi, via the 31 Great Circle/Polygonals of the icosahedron, because, of the icosahedrons 15 golden( phi ) rectangles ---15 GrCP's-- and 12 overlapping golden pentagons.

Rybo

You may be going out on a limb with the "two vectors with a V relationship = the minimal degrees of relativity and consciousness". I'm not too familiar with the 31 Great Circles/Polygonals", but it could be you are out on another limb by saying "the 31 Great Circles/Polygonals of the regular/symmetrical Icosahedron" are "the basis of spacetime gravity". Maybe the third limb you are straddling is in the following: " ---static representation that is--- and the 3 sets of known bosonic forces".

However, forget being out on those limbs and let me start with a small step; tell me what the "V" and the two radii have to do with consciousness?

[labelwench]

From your profile page......Icosahedral gravity........I'll have to review that concept as I am only familiar with the ordinary kind of gravity from unsuccessful attempts at resisting same.


If you can explain gravity, I'm rather certain that some would be most interested.

[Rybo]

From your profile page......Icosahedral gravity........I'll have to review that concept as I am only familiar with the ordinary kind of gravity from unsuccessful attempts at resisting same.
If you can explain gravity, I'm rather certain that some would be most interested.

Gravity = mass-attraction is fairly well known concept. Dude name Newton was first to explain it. Then another dude name Einstein expanded upon and added some graphic-like topological-like geometric-like ideas.

Icosahedron is a topological and geometry thing aka a polyhedron and first discovered maybe 2000 yrs ago..I dunno.

My comments relating gravity and icosahedron are speculative. There is lots of speculative comments about gravity from some of the greatest physics scientist-type in the world. Rybo

[Rybo]

However, forget being out on those limbs and let me start with a small step; tell me what the "V" and the two radii have to do with consciousness?

Bogie, so, i will try this again. Like the word God, spirit soul and almost every word in a dictionary, if you ask a hundred differrent people what the word consciousness means to them, you will probably get no less than 50 differrent answers that have some overlapping relationships.

Maximal consicousness = access to metaphysical mind eg. abstract Pi, phi, etc.....

Minimal consciousness = "twoness, otherness, awareness life" is quote from Fullers Synergetics. There he will show you a graphic of two spheres as observer, observed ergo a minimal twoness with a 3rdness as the line of relationship between the two and 4thness as the background of nothingness by which observer, observed and perhaps their linef of relationship is differrentiated out from.

V = twoness also, since, as I may have stated, it represents two vectors. Maybe I left that part. I forget, however, my minimal V consciousness is differrent from Fullers, in that, there is an angular change of direction, ergo two vectors, ecah with their own specific direction, if not spin. I dunno.

I could go back to my original writings on that. Interesting tho, was the V thoughts coincidentally aligned with some Pi^3power explorations a few days later. I was so tickled pink, to find these most abstract connections also connected to w-whole-rational #31. I did the Pi^ out 29th power and the double zeros setting the 31 so far apart from the other powered Pi's irrational side I was estatic.

So I hope that gives you some more info to process. Seems pretty simple to me.. I dunno. Even the simple is connected to complexity. Ry

[Bogie]

Bogie, so, i will try this again. Like the word God, spirit soul and almost every word in a dictionary, if you ask a hundred differrent people what the word consciousness means to them, you will probably get no less than 50 differrent answers that have some overlapping relationships.

Maximal consicousness = access to metaphysical mind eg. abstract Pi, phi, etc.....

Minimal consciousness = "twoness, otherness, awareness life" is quote from Fullers Synergetics. There he will show you a graphic of two spheres as observer, observed ergo aminimal twoness with a 3rdness as the line of relationship between the two and 4thness as the background of nothingness by which observer, observed and perhaps their linef of relationship is differrentiated out from.

V = twoness also, since, as I may have stated, it represents two vectors. Maybe I left that part. I forget, however, my minmal V consciousness is differrent from Fullers, in that, there is an angular change of direction, ergo two vectors, ecah with their own specific direction, if not spin. I dunno.

I could go back to my original writings on that. Interesting tho, was the V thoughts coincidentally aligned with some Pi^3power explorations a few days later. I was so tickled pink, to find these most abstract connections also connected to teh quasi-whole-rational #31. I did the Pi^ out 2th power and the double zeros setting the 31 so far apart from the other powered Pi's irrational side I was estatic.

So I hope that gives you some more info to process. Seems pretty simple to me.. I dunno. Even the simple is connected to complexity. Ry

OK, there you are. A simple relationship between the physical and metaphysics conveyed in terms and complexity that I don't grasp. No matter though because if you see it, then there may be something to it. I'll see if I can process the info.

[Rybo]

OK, there you are. A simple relationship between the physical and metaphysics conveyed in terms and complexity that I don't grasp. No matter though because if you see it, then there may be something to it. I'll see if I can process the info.

Thx for your sincere consideration Bogie, and again, hundred differrent people may give us 50 differrent answers to what does physical and metaphysical mean.

Mind = metaphysical concepts, abstractions ratios, mathematics, languages etc....
..{ absolute and relative truths }...

As above so below is and old saying, however, although all conceptioning can only be based upon our physical existence ---ie. physical experience precedes thoughts--- we may conceive of ideas that have no physical representations eg. macro-infinite physical universe.

Brain = physical sensorial(?) nervous system of awareness
..{ info quanta-bits of energy dynamics }...

I better stop there as I may tend toward getting to far off topic of Pi-7-31-V = relativity/consciousness = 2.

Rybo

[Rybo]

From your profile page......Icosahedral gravity........I'll have to review that concept as I am only familiar with the ordinary kind of gravity from unsuccessful attempts at resisting same.
If you can explain gravity, I'm rather certain that some would be most interested.

Label, I'm not sure why you exclude any icosahedral patterning involvement with "ordinary" gravity i.e. my speculations are meant to address this so labeled "ordinary' gravity of newton, Einstein and pretty much all the conventionally accepted information known about gravity and not some 'extraordinary' gravity that your comments appear to infer/imply/ or indirectly invoke.

I'm agreement with Fuller that space, or at least occupied space and spacetime, have a shape. A chair occupy's space and has a shape. Atoms occupy space and have a shape, albiet a dynamically changing shape, to some degree. Particles occupy space and have associated shapes/patterns albeit they are dynamic, so changing patterns that may have some basic patterns that they reference in while the exist as this specific particle or another.

Occupied space has specific shape/patterned associations, is all that I'm alluding to. Non-occupied space has no shape.

Non-occupied space is macro-micro-infinite. Occupied space is finite and has structural integrity, if only for short periods of time, in some cases.

Rybo

[labelwench]

Label, I'm not sure why you exclude any icosahedral patterning involvement with "ordinary" gravity i.e. my speculations are meant to address this so labeled "ordinary' gravity of newton, Einstein and pretty much all the conventionally accepted information known about gravity and not some 'extraordinary' gravity that your comments appear to infer/imply/ or indirectly invoke.

I'm agreement with Fuller that space, or at least occupied space and spacetime, have a shape. A chair occupy's space and has a shape. Atoms occupy space and have a shape, albiet a dynamically changing shape, to some degree. Particles occupy space and have associated shapes/patterns albeit they are dynamic, so changing patterns that may have some basic patterns that they reference in while the exist as this specific particle or another.

Occupied space has specific shape/patterned associations, is all that I'm alluding to. Non-occupied space has no shape.

Non-occupied space is macro-micro-infinite. Occupied space is finite and has structural integrity, if only for short periods of time, in some cases.

Rybo

Hello Rybo,

I am not excluding the concept of Icosahedral gravity, merely expressing that I am not familiar with the term and that all I really understand about gravity comes from my experiencing it as a force that can work for or against me, depending on the circumstances.

Shake a branch of a tree to access a high growing fruit and gravity works for me.

Coming off of a moving horse, unless one can tuck and roll one will find that gravity has less benevolent aspects.

On the topic of space having shape.....if non-occupied space has no shape, it would therefore have no gravity? There has to be a shape, or occupied space for gravity to work upon?

Am I understanding this part at all?

Don't be terribly daunted by my lack of understanding of these topics. I seem to be possessed of adequate survival skills nonetheless......

[Rybo]

Pi( 12 places ) = 3.14 15 92 65 35 89
Pi( 12 places )^3 = 31.00 62_7_66 802_7_ 63
..{ 3rd powering give us 31( GrCP's ) and 62( radials/radii ) }..
31( prime ) primary, Great Circle-like Polygonal Planes of the Icosahedron( primary )
..{ #31 is prime out to 7 places i.e 33 33 33 + 1 = 7 places }...

V = Viewpoint i.e. the yippion is point of angular change i.e. it is the nuclear/central 'I-ness' observer, and is in physical interaction with incoming info-bits from ---or reflected off of--- the surrounding, gravitational spacetiime geodesic.

This is consciousness, doing its thing, albeit, in many more complex ways than this simplicity I 've laid out here and below.

What is fascinating, ---tantalizing--- is to see these potential interconnections, albiet via some of the most abstract metaphysical mathmatics of Pi, Pi^3 and possibly phi.

Pi^3 invoking a 3D polyhedron and specifically an icosahedral configuration complex.

31, if connected to Icosahedron's 31 Great Circle-like Polygonals.

00, if isolating out the 31 as special in someway ---eg. icosahedron---.

62 if associate with 31 Pi diameters, albeit an abstract 180 diameter that has become V-iewpoint of observation that reflects off of the quasi-physical, ---quasi-physica because ultra-micro and beyond our ability to quantize--- gravitational spacetime geodesics to create our physical observational perceptions of reality as varying wave frequencies.

7 as that finite/terminal/limiting numerical factor that contains the prime #31 to seven places ---3333331----- and invokes a stopping in Pi^3 at 4th or 5th places, as tho to signify, you need look no further to find the frequency reality and the surrounding circumferential spacetime gravity that coheres and ergo allows for eternal regenerations of frequency involvement.

The most abstract and transcendental aspects of infinity of Pi need not be induced, to winnow out our finite physical universe.

Rybo