Welcome to the ToeQuest.
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 13

Thread: cubic principle

  1. #1
    Raider of the lost time
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    11,784
    Blog Entries
    10
    Thanks Given
    1,106
    Thanked 1,474x in 1,194 Posts
    Rep Power
    158

    cubic principle

    Physical reality is ruled by this fundamental law as the basis of reasoning or verbal action for understanding or arguing about the existence of matter and energy in a three dimensional universe. In the sense of simple mathematical constructs, it can be argued that a three dimensional cubic principle is proved to be equivalent to a principle of directional invariance with no more and no less than eight directional properties. Experimental verifications of physical existence (e.g. proving the existence of the scalar spin zero Higgs boson) can sorely be done in a three dimensional devise known as the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) at CERN with one competition at FermiLab or others similar devices under construction by other wealthy nations. This scientific instrument known as a particle accelerator is not limited by its design or the innovative imagination of its creators (linear, circular, etc.) but limited by a monetary value connected to the uncertainty principle of one dimensional time and multi-dimensional forms of energy.


    A book has already been written by Amir D. Aczel on the life and time of LHC. The intermittent lives of LHC exist during periods that its electric power grid is switched on and LHC becomes briefly operational. The two reasons for these brief functional colliding encounters between protons and antiprotons are the facts that, firstly, both protons and antiprotons are expensive and difficult to collect and to accumulate in their auxiliary storages, and secondly, again, the uncertainty principle of time and energy, more so, for the artificial creation of antimatter such as antiprotons. It has been well understood since the discovery of the existence of antiparticles in the first quarter of the 20th century that colliding matter and antimatter produces pure 3D form of energy. However, natural occurrence of antimatter anywhere and anywhen is practically zero. Only by expensive artificial means can antimatter become realized. This difficulty implies that lower or higher dimensional forms of energy exclusively apply for the quanta of space-time, while the cubic principle (3D) of energy applies for the existence of both matter and first power of energy. However, the dominant directional properties of matter in this particular physical universe prevent the formation of analogous antidirectional properties of antimatter. Globally, this infinitesimally local directional property proves that the physical universe as a whole possesses an intrinsic angular momentum equivalent to the spin of the quantum fields of elementary particles. Nevertheless, as multi-dimensional forms of energy, the scalar spin zero Higgs boson must possess multiples of all eight directional properties of a principle of directional invariance. [8,8], [16,16], [24,24], [32,32], [40,40], [48,48], [64,64], so on and so forth. But unfortunately, the [8,8] directional configuration has already been assigned to the Z0 boson among the four electroweak bosons, namely: photon [4,4], W-plus [8,2], W-minus [2,8], and of course Z0 [8,8].
    Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²

  2. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to AntonioLao For This Useful Post:

    Graybeard (08-21-2011), PoPpAScience (08-20-2011)

  3. #2
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Posts
    11,625
    Blog Entries
    5
    Thanks Given
    296
    Thanked 896x in 724 Posts
    Rep Power
    154

    Re: cubic principle

    A three dimensional universe with an implied forth dimension that being time seems to make the square of matter firmer to the touch,principles that are universal all seem to contain the inclusive factor of being there for all the other principles a sort of affinity within infinity!


    regards michael.
    Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
    reveal herself?

  4. The Following User Says Thank You to mkirkpatrick For This Useful Post:

    AntonioLao (08-22-2011)

  5. #3
    Raider of the lost time
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    11,784
    Blog Entries
    10
    Thanks Given
    1,106
    Thanked 1,474x in 1,194 Posts
    Rep Power
    158

    Re: cubic principle

    Time is the 4th dimension for special and general theory of relativity. In a quantum theory of space-time, each quantum of space-time is at most 3 dimensions (topology Klein bottle) but at least one dimension (Hopf link). The working dimension of space-time is two dimensions (Mobius surface). This surface can be represented by a sieve of Diophantus.
    Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²

  6. #4
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Posts
    11,625
    Blog Entries
    5
    Thanks Given
    296
    Thanked 896x in 724 Posts
    Rep Power
    154

    Re: cubic principle

    Quote Originally Posted by AntonioLao View Post
    Time is the 4th dimension for special and general theory of relativity. In a quantum theory of space-time, each quantum of space-time is at most 3 dimensions (topology Klein bottle) but at least one dimension (Hopf link). The working dimension of space-time is two dimensions (Mobius surface). This surface can be represented by a sieve of Diophantus.
    I see the Mobius surface as a transporter of souls in and out of incarnation,a sort of erect 8 as a spiral left handed down into incarnation,and a right handed spiral up into astral existence,an S shaped spiral down and an S shaped spiral up the two cojoined make the vertical 8 vortex.

    regards michael.
    Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
    reveal herself?

  7. The Following User Says Thank You to mkirkpatrick For This Useful Post:

    AntonioLao (08-27-2011)

  8. #5
    Raider of the lost time
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    11,784
    Blog Entries
    10
    Thanks Given
    1,106
    Thanked 1,474x in 1,194 Posts
    Rep Power
    158

    Re: cubic principle

    Both S shapes down and up would suggest cutting the Mobius topology crosswise. Doing so would destroy the inherent topological structure and the two-directional property of time. On the other hand, a trivector going around the Mobius would preserve its directional invariance properties except for one property between left and right or up and down or forward and backward indicating one cycle around the strip is completed.
    Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²

  9. The Following User Says Thank You to AntonioLao For This Useful Post:

    mkirkpatrick (08-27-2011)

  10. #6
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Posts
    11,625
    Blog Entries
    5
    Thanks Given
    296
    Thanked 896x in 724 Posts
    Rep Power
    154

    Re: cubic principle

    Quote Originally Posted by AntonioLao View Post
    Both S shapes down and up would suggest cutting the Mobius topology crosswise. Doing so would destroy the inherent topological structure and the two-directional property of time. On the other hand, a trivector going around the Mobius would preserve its directional invariance properties except for one property between left and right or up and down or forward and backward indicating one cycle around the strip is completed.
    One cycle into physical incarnation another cycle out into astral existence in effect a vertical eight held in a cohesive embrace of Mobius momentum.

    regards michael.
    Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
    reveal herself?

  11. #7
    Raider of the lost time
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    11,784
    Blog Entries
    10
    Thanks Given
    1,106
    Thanked 1,474x in 1,194 Posts
    Rep Power
    158

    Re: cubic principle

    In a theory of quantized directional invariance, vertical or horizontal orientations cannot be easily distinguished.
    Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²

  12. #8
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Posts
    11,625
    Blog Entries
    5
    Thanks Given
    296
    Thanked 896x in 724 Posts
    Rep Power
    154

    Re: cubic principle

    Quote Originally Posted by AntonioLao View Post
    In a theory of quantized directional invariance, vertical or horizontal orientations cannot be easily distinguished.
    Can you imagine a reason for this?

    regards michael.
    Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
    reveal herself?

  13. #9
    Raider of the lost time
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    11,784
    Blog Entries
    10
    Thanks Given
    1,106
    Thanked 1,474x in 1,194 Posts
    Rep Power
    158

    Re: cubic principle

    One reason being that reality is relatively directive in accordance with the special theory of relativity. A person inside a train moving at constant uniform speed cannot sense his or her motion (forward or backward) unless s(he) look out the window and observed other objects in relative motion or at rest: the tracks, the houses, the cars, etc.
    Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²

  14. #10
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Posts
    11,625
    Blog Entries
    5
    Thanks Given
    296
    Thanked 896x in 724 Posts
    Rep Power
    154

    Re: cubic principle

    Quote Originally Posted by AntonioLao View Post
    One reason being that reality is relatively directive in accordance with the special theory of relativity. A person inside a train moving at constant uniform speed cannot sense his or her motion (forward or backward) unless s(he) look out the window and observed other objects in relative motion or at rest: the tracks, the houses, the cars, etc.
    Does not reality present itself in a two pronged offensive? One being relatively real (temporal) the other being Absolute (eternal).

    regards michael.
    Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
    reveal herself?

 

 
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Back to top