Welcome to the ToeQuest.
Page 1 of 4 1234 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 33
  1. #1
    Raider of the lost time
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    11,784
    Blog Entries
    10
    Thanks Given
    1,106
    Thanked 1,474x in 1,194 Posts
    Rep Power
    158

    adding temperature

    Since the dawn of civilization, at the epoch “fire” was discovered, science minded people begin to find ways to measure the “hotness” of “fire.” Along this endeavor, blacksmiths found that blue flame is very much hotter than red flame and a sword forged by blue flame became the toughest of many bladed weapons. The real reason only became known in 1900 during the beginning of the quantum revolution heralded by the molecular kinetic theory of heat. Before 1900 heat was hypothesized as a fluid that flows by conduction from one substance to another. Each fluid is calibrated using various scales of temperature. For the Fahrenheit scale at standard pressure of 1 atmosphere water boils at 212°F and freezes at 32°F. The healthy human body has a normal temperature of 98.6°F. Thereafter scientists begin to realize that adding temperature is physically impossible. For example, two healthy humans locked together never boil away as the combined temperature reaching 212°F. On the other hand, a large group of Emperor Penguins locking bodies together has survived subzero temperatures in the Antarctic for thousands of years.

    The impossibility of adding temperature is a dilemma that succeeding scientists overcome by defining two more thermodynamics concepts: the enthalpy and the specific heat. There are many applied definitions of enthalpy and specific heat. As a form of energy, enthalpy has the same units, while the specific heat is a multiplicative constant specific for each substance with units of energy per unit mass and unit degree of temperature. If the specific heat is known for a given substance then its product with its temperature gives the amount of energy stored in the substance. Enthalpy can be added as well as subtracted. Extending this idea to the quantum vacuum fluctuations, since the cosmic background radiation has temperature of a few degrees kelvins, if the specific heat of the quantum vacuum can be determined then their product gives the stored energy of the vacuum, suggesting that the enthalpy of the vacuum is extractable!
    Time independence: [∂E(g)]˛=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c˛

  2. The Following User Says Thank You to AntonioLao For This Useful Post:

    Graybeard (10-25-2011)

  3. #2
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Posts
    11,625
    Blog Entries
    5
    Thanks Given
    296
    Thanked 896x in 724 Posts
    Rep Power
    154

    Re: adding temperature

    Two humans huddled together in freezing conditions will have a better chance at survival than just one,how much heat then do we need to add to secure cold fusion?


    regards michael.
    Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
    reveal herself?

  4. #3
    Raider of the lost time
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    11,784
    Blog Entries
    10
    Thanks Given
    1,106
    Thanked 1,474x in 1,194 Posts
    Rep Power
    158

    Re: adding temperature

    Quote Originally Posted by mkirkpatrick
    how much heat then do we need to add to secure cold fusion?
    Not much. Since cold fusion is fundamentally independent of the laws of thermodynamics, it can occur at any given temperature. The trick is to get the deuterons close enougn to initiate fusion. This closeness is described by a theory of relative proximity. A theory of proximity would make the law of gravity unnecessary.
    Time independence: [∂E(g)]˛=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c˛

  5. #4
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Posts
    11,625
    Blog Entries
    5
    Thanks Given
    296
    Thanked 896x in 724 Posts
    Rep Power
    154

    Re: adding temperature

    Quote Originally Posted by AntonioLao View Post
    Not much. Since cold fusion is fundamentally independent of the laws of thermodynamics, it can occur at any given temperature. The trick is to get the deuterons close enougn to initiate fusion. This closeness is described by a theory of relative proximity. A theory of proximity would make the law of gravity unnecessary.
    It seems we have the basic idea and the way cold fusion should work,the biggest obstacle seems to be in actually getting the mixture to fuse.What then is the main stumbling block?And can we soon remove it?

    regards michael.
    Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
    reveal herself?

  6. #5
    Raider of the lost time
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    11,784
    Blog Entries
    10
    Thanks Given
    1,106
    Thanked 1,474x in 1,194 Posts
    Rep Power
    158

    Re: adding temperature

    The question can be answered if we find a way to control the repulsive force of two deuterons of equal electric charge. If we can make one into its opposite charge they would then attract each other.
    Time independence: [∂E(g)]˛=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c˛

  7. #6
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Posts
    11,625
    Blog Entries
    5
    Thanks Given
    296
    Thanked 896x in 724 Posts
    Rep Power
    154

    Re: adding temperature

    Quote Originally Posted by AntonioLao View Post
    The question can be answered if we find a way to control the repulsive force of two deuterons of equal electric charge. If we can make one into its opposite charge they would then attract each other.
    Well that sounds fairly straightforward but it can't be that easy or else it would have been done already.

    regards michael.
    Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
    reveal herself?

  8. #7
    Raider of the lost time
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    11,784
    Blog Entries
    10
    Thanks Given
    1,106
    Thanked 1,474x in 1,194 Posts
    Rep Power
    158

    Re: adding temperature

    It is not even hard to break a magnet into two pieces but to put them back together the way it was is impossible. Try it and believe.
    Time independence: [∂E(g)]˛=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c˛

  9. #8
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Posts
    11,625
    Blog Entries
    5
    Thanks Given
    296
    Thanked 896x in 724 Posts
    Rep Power
    154

    Re: adding temperature

    Quote Originally Posted by AntonioLao View Post
    It is not even hard to break a magnet into two pieces but to put them back together the way it was is impossible. Try it and believe.
    I can well imagine the difficulty,We need to be able to imagine the solution,then with focussed intent go for it.


    regards michael.
    Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
    reveal herself?

  10. #9
    Raider of the lost time
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    11,784
    Blog Entries
    10
    Thanks Given
    1,106
    Thanked 1,474x in 1,194 Posts
    Rep Power
    158

    Re: adding temperature

    FYI, astronomers in repeated efforts to construct more and more powerful optical refracting telescopes have realized that larger and larger lenses tend to get out of focus. One remedy is to use larger and larger reflecting telescope using concave mirrors instead of convex lenses. But the ultimate solution is provided by using a group of interferometers of radio telescopes. Using radio telescopes scientists hope to detect the very weak gravity waves of colliding universes.
    Time independence: [∂E(g)]˛=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c˛

  11. #10
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Posts
    11,625
    Blog Entries
    5
    Thanks Given
    296
    Thanked 896x in 724 Posts
    Rep Power
    154

    Re: adding temperature

    Quote Originally Posted by AntonioLao View Post
    FYI, astronomers in repeated efforts to construct more and more powerful optical refracting telescopes have realized that larger and larger lenses tend to get out of focus. One remedy is to use larger and larger reflecting telescope using concave mirrors instead of convex lenses. But the ultimate solution is provided by using a group of interferometers of radio telescopes. Using radio telescopes scientists hope to detect the very weak gravity waves of colliding universes.
    Yes I have been aware of this too,There is a lot of them in Peru high in the Andes I hear.

    regards michael.
    Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
    reveal herself?

 

 
Page 1 of 4 1234 LastLast

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Back to top