Welcome to the ToeQuest.
Page 1 of 12 1234511 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 113
  1. #1
    Raider of the lost time
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    11,784
    Blog Entries
    10
    Thanks Given
    1,106
    Thanked 1,474x in 1,194 Posts
    Rep Power
    158

    vacuum specific heat capacity

    The internal energy of the vacuum can be expressed as the product of its specific heat capacity and the absolute temperature. This temperature is equivalent to the temperature of the cosmic background radiation of a few degrees kelvins. Since this temperature changes in a decreasing order for the history of the quantum vacuum, the vacuum specific heat capacity has also changed during the same period of time. In order for the internal energy to remain a constant, the vacuum specific heat capacity must change in an increasing order such that the product of temperature and specific heat is a constant through time. However, there exists a statistical deviation from the mean of this constant. This is manifested by the quantum vacuum fluctuations as observed by the quantum mechanics of high energy physics. The hypothesized extraction of vacuum energy must now become dependent on the physical existence of the vacuum specific heat capacity.


    It is now generally agreed among physical scientists that the absolute zero of the thermodynamic temperature cannot be attained by any physical means. If this temperature is equivalent to the cosmic background temperature then it implies that the heat death of the universe could never occur in the distant future. It also means that with the certainty of changing vacuum specific heat capacity the internal energy of the vacuum cannot change in time. The existence of both matter and the first power of energy testify to the fact that vacuum specific heat capacity is allowed to change in space. This means that although the space-time continuum is homogeneous it cannot be isotropic at the infinitesimal region. It suggests that the space-time continuum can be quantized. This quantization can only be applied properly to the squares of the zero-point energies of the quantum vacuum fluctuations.
    Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²

  2. #2
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Posts
    11,625
    Blog Entries
    5
    Thanks Given
    296
    Thanked 896x in 724 Posts
    Rep Power
    154

    Re: vacuum specific heat capacity

    We all need heat to stay alive and be comfortable while in a physical body,but once we leave this physical body and take on the astral body the heat and cold whether it be very hot or even at absolute zero no longer apply to us as temperature only applies to the physical universe and not to the etheric universe or spiritual universe.


    regards michael.
    Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
    reveal herself?

  3. #3
    Raider of the lost time
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    11,784
    Blog Entries
    10
    Thanks Given
    1,106
    Thanked 1,474x in 1,194 Posts
    Rep Power
    158

    Re: vacuum specific heat capacity

    It that because the spiritual unverse is a one dimensional universe equivalent to the Hopf links?
    Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²

  4. #4
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Posts
    11,625
    Blog Entries
    5
    Thanks Given
    296
    Thanked 896x in 724 Posts
    Rep Power
    154

    Re: vacuum specific heat capacity

    Quote Originally Posted by AntonioLao View Post
    It that because the spiritual unverse is a one dimensional universe equivalent to the Hopf links?
    I am not sure of that,it is in another dimension that is for sure!

    regards michael.
    Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
    reveal herself?

  5. #5
    Raider of the lost time
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    11,784
    Blog Entries
    10
    Thanks Given
    1,106
    Thanked 1,474x in 1,194 Posts
    Rep Power
    158

    Re: vacuum specific heat capacity

    The physical dimension is three no more and no less. The two dimensions and one dimension we encounter in our daily activities are projections of three dimensions simply because our line of sight using light rays is one dimensional.
    Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²

  6. #6
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Posts
    11,625
    Blog Entries
    5
    Thanks Given
    296
    Thanked 896x in 724 Posts
    Rep Power
    154

    Re: vacuum specific heat capacity

    Quote Originally Posted by AntonioLao View Post
    The physical dimension is three no more and no less. The two dimensions and one dimension we encounter in our daily activities are projections of three dimensions simply because our line of sight using light rays is one dimensional.
    Perhaps the spiritual universe is multi dimensional and that it includes all aspects of expression.

    regards michael.
    Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
    reveal herself?

  7. #7
    Raider of the lost time
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    11,784
    Blog Entries
    10
    Thanks Given
    1,106
    Thanked 1,474x in 1,194 Posts
    Rep Power
    158

    Re: vacuum specific heat capacity

    But multi-dimensionality goes according to certain hierarchies of 123-123-123-123...These make more sense if the word 'dimension' is replaced by the word 'direction.'
    Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²

  8. #8
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Posts
    11,625
    Blog Entries
    5
    Thanks Given
    296
    Thanked 896x in 724 Posts
    Rep Power
    154

    Re: vacuum specific heat capacity

    Quote Originally Posted by AntonioLao View Post
    But multi-dimensionality goes according to certain hierarchies of 123-123-123-123...These make more sense if the word 'dimension' is replaced by the word 'direction.'
    Well alright then let us use the word direction instead,this will give us a focus point.

    regards michael.
    Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
    reveal herself?

  9. #9
    Raider of the lost time
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    11,784
    Blog Entries
    10
    Thanks Given
    1,106
    Thanked 1,474x in 1,194 Posts
    Rep Power
    158

    Re: vacuum specific heat capacity

    Elegantly, a quantum theory of the space-time continuum, at the least, needs only 8 directional invariance properties. I have posted this idea in several posts. But I don't think anyone fully understood of what I'm saying. Like vectors and tensors, a quantum of space-time has directional properties. Moreover, these can be described using Hadamard matrices. FYI, Roger Penrose tried using complex imaginary twistors to to construct a theory of space-time. He failed. Dirac used spinors (complex imaginary matrices) but only succeed in constructing a quantum theory of fermions (matter particles) but it failed to provide a complete theory of boson particles (energy particles).
    Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²

  10. #10
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Posts
    11,625
    Blog Entries
    5
    Thanks Given
    296
    Thanked 896x in 724 Posts
    Rep Power
    154

    Re: vacuum specific heat capacity

    Quote Originally Posted by AntonioLao View Post
    Elegantly, a quantum theory of the space-time continuum, at the least, needs only 8 directional invariance properties. I have posted this idea in several posts. But I don't think anyone fully understood of what I'm saying. Like vectors and tensors, a quantum of space-time has directional properties. Moreover, these can be described using Hadamard matrices. FYI, Roger Penrose tried using complex imaginary twistors to to construct a theory of space-time. He failed. Dirac used spinors (complex imaginary matrices) but only succeed in constructing a quantum theory of fermions (matter particles) but it failed to provide a complete theory of boson particles (energy particles).
    It is difficult at times to get one's head around certain concepts,we,I will do my best to understand.

    regards michael.
    Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
    reveal herself?

 

 
Page 1 of 12 1234511 ... LastLast

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Back to top