If we can combine all the relatives can we derive a singular absolute? Or a dual absolute of opposites?
If we can combine all the relatives can we derive a singular absolute? Or a dual absolute of opposites?
Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: ¶a(t)·¶r(t)=c²
But the dual topologies of the quantized space-time continuum cannot be eliminated from its theory. This is the same as saying for everything in the universe, be it matter or energy, there always existed an electric component and a magnetic component. But the polarity of electricity is physically real. However, the magnetic reality remains forever dipolar, implying that magnetic monopoles cannot be isolated without invoking certain topological space-time structure, for example, Mobius topology.
Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: ¶a(t)·¶r(t)=c²
Mobius topology is inherently dual. its one dimensional transformation is called the Hopf link. It three dimensional transformation is called the Klein bottle.
Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: ¶a(t)·¶r(t)=c²
Complete understanding of Mobius topology can solve the cold fusion of deuterons.
Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: ¶a(t)·¶r(t)=c²
It is more like a figure 8 factor with the one exception that the curve never cross itself.
Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: ¶a(t)·¶r(t)=c²
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)