Welcome to the ToeQuest.
Page 1 of 24 1234511 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 239
  1. #1
    Raider of the lost time
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    11,784
    Blog Entries
    10
    Thanks Given
    1,106
    Thanked 1,474x in 1,194 Posts
    Rep Power
    158

    here often or here always

    In the classical theory of electromagnetism, Maxwell formulated four sets of partial differential equations that bear his name: Maxwell’s equations of the electromagnetic field. These equations describe the propagations of electromagnetic waves. This classical theory is based on the experiments performed by Faraday asserting the physical existence of the electric field and the magnetic field. Their mutual orthogonal interactions produce waves that radiate at the speed given by 1/Ö(em) where e is defined as the absolute permittivity and m the absolute permeability of the space-time continuum (classically called the vacuum). Equivalently, this speed is also elegantly given as the product of a defined frequency and a defined wavelength: c=nl where n signifies frequency and l signifies wavelength. In a space-time continuum devoid of matter, this speed is a constant. In media of increasingly varying mass density this speed is decreasingly less than its vacuum value. In space-time regions of infinite mass density this speed is exactly zero.


    The idea of infinite mass density is topologically equivalent to the idea of a twist of a one-sided Möbius topology. This twist applied to the space-time continuum becomes the big bang singularity. This space-time singularity is zero dimensional. However, in the infinitesimal neighborhood of this singularity, the transformation of one dimension to zero dimensions is the space-time contraction of a Hopf link. Each cycle of one complete loop reveals a fundamental frequency of zero-point energy. It is physically and mathematically logical to set the associated fundamental wavelength equal to the Planck length. In the event that the Planck length approaches the value of zero, the corresponding vacuum frequency approaches infinity. This infinite frequency implies that a quantum of the space-time continuum can be found here often, while approaching zero Planck length implies that the quantum of the space-time continuum is here always. The multiplicative product of often and always (infinity and zero) remains a constant called the speed of light. But this implies that the Planck length can never reach the exact value of zero since zero multiplied by any quantity is still zero, which suggests that the one dimensional Hopf topology remains valid at the infinitesimal region of the space-time continuum.
    Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²

  2. #2
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Posts
    11,625
    Blog Entries
    5
    Thanks Given
    296
    Thanked 896x in 724 Posts
    Rep Power
    154

    Re: here often or here always

    Here always,that's my feeling but not always in this dimension.We are forever expressed.


    regards michael.
    Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
    reveal herself?

  3. #3
    Raider of the lost time
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    11,784
    Blog Entries
    10
    Thanks Given
    1,106
    Thanked 1,474x in 1,194 Posts
    Rep Power
    158

    Re: here often or here always

    You mean not always in this direction?
    Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²

  4. #4
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Posts
    11,625
    Blog Entries
    5
    Thanks Given
    296
    Thanked 896x in 724 Posts
    Rep Power
    154

    Re: here often or here always

    Quote Originally Posted by AntonioLao View Post
    You mean not always in this direction?
    That's a good question,I would think in a differing direction at times.

    regards michael.
    Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
    reveal herself?

  5. #5
    Raider of the lost time
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    11,784
    Blog Entries
    10
    Thanks Given
    1,106
    Thanked 1,474x in 1,194 Posts
    Rep Power
    158

    Re: here often or here always

    If you are in all directions at all time then you become a quantum of the space-time continuum.
    Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²

  6. #6
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Posts
    11,625
    Blog Entries
    5
    Thanks Given
    296
    Thanked 896x in 724 Posts
    Rep Power
    154

    Re: here often or here always

    Quote Originally Posted by AntonioLao View Post
    If you are in all directions at all time then you become a quantum of the space-time continuum.
    That sounds like an exciting place to be in.


    regards michael.
    Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
    reveal herself?

  7. #7
    Raider of the lost time
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    11,784
    Blog Entries
    10
    Thanks Given
    1,106
    Thanked 1,474x in 1,194 Posts
    Rep Power
    158

    Re: here often or here always

    But not as exciting as being alive, here and now.
    Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²

  8. #8
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Posts
    11,625
    Blog Entries
    5
    Thanks Given
    296
    Thanked 896x in 724 Posts
    Rep Power
    154

    Re: here often or here always

    Quote Originally Posted by AntonioLao View Post
    But not as exciting as being alive, here and now.
    Well no what could beat that?


    regards michael.
    Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
    reveal herself?

  9. #9
    Raider of the lost time
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    11,784
    Blog Entries
    10
    Thanks Given
    1,106
    Thanked 1,474x in 1,194 Posts
    Rep Power
    158

    Re: here often or here always

    being alive here, now,and forever and everywhere.
    Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²

  10. #10
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Posts
    11,625
    Blog Entries
    5
    Thanks Given
    296
    Thanked 896x in 724 Posts
    Rep Power
    154

    Re: here often or here always

    Quote Originally Posted by AntonioLao View Post
    being alive here, now,and forever and everywhere.
    Well we would be ominipresent in that case just like the Absolute.


    regards michael.
    Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
    reveal herself?

 

 
Page 1 of 24 1234511 ... LastLast

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Back to top