LinkBack URL
About LinkBacksCan we assume that the biggest egocentric moron of them all is the big bang singularity?
Welcome to the ToeQuest.
Results 21 to 30 of 365
Thread: pugilistic physics
- 11-14-2011, 11:07 AM #21Raider of the lost time
- Join Date
- Nov 2003
- Location
- United States
- Posts
- 11,784
- Blog Entries
- 10
- Thanks Given
- 1,106
- Thanked 1,474x in 1,194 Posts
- Rep Power
- 158
Re: pugilistic physics
Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: ¶a(t)·¶r(t)=c²
- 11-14-2011, 11:09 AM #22Moderator
- Join Date
- Aug 2005
- Location
- United Kingdom
- Posts
- 11,625
- Blog Entries
- 5
- Thanks Given
- 296
- Thanked 896x in 724 Posts
- Rep Power
- 154
Re: pugilistic physics
Yes I think we can assume this,as from this point all has sprung from.
Originally Posted by AntonioLao 
regards michael.Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
reveal herself?
- 11-14-2011, 11:25 AM #23Raider of the lost time
- Join Date
- Nov 2003
- Location
- United States
- Posts
- 11,784
- Blog Entries
- 10
- Thanks Given
- 1,106
- Thanked 1,474x in 1,194 Posts
- Rep Power
- 158
Re: pugilistic physics
I am asserting that the big bang never happened. I derived this assertion from a quantum theory of the space-time continuum.
Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: ¶a(t)·¶r(t)=c²
- 11-14-2011, 12:53 PM #24Moderator
- Join Date
- Aug 2005
- Location
- United Kingdom
- Posts
- 11,625
- Blog Entries
- 5
- Thanks Given
- 296
- Thanked 896x in 724 Posts
- Rep Power
- 154
Re: pugilistic physics
Well I am not sure,I think the universe goes in cycles spanning billions of years,then begin again. Originally Posted by AntonioLao
regards michael.Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
reveal herself?
- 11-15-2011, 10:31 AM #25Raider of the lost time
- Join Date
- Nov 2003
- Location
- United States
- Posts
- 11,784
- Blog Entries
- 10
- Thanks Given
- 1,106
- Thanked 1,474x in 1,194 Posts
- Rep Power
- 158
Re: pugilistic physics
In science, we have to be sure about our conjectures before we can prove them into theorems. The cycle of the universe could conform more to a Mobius cycle, since physical concept of frequency (both spatial and temporal) can be described as a completion of this infinitesimal Mobius cycle.
Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: ¶a(t)·¶r(t)=c²
- 11-15-2011, 10:37 AM #26Moderator
- Join Date
- Aug 2005
- Location
- United Kingdom
- Posts
- 11,625
- Blog Entries
- 5
- Thanks Given
- 296
- Thanked 896x in 724 Posts
- Rep Power
- 154
Re: pugilistic physics
Yes that's it,a Mobius cycle seems just right. Originally Posted by AntonioLao
regards michael.Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
reveal herself?
- 11-15-2011, 10:52 AM #27Raider of the lost time
- Join Date
- Nov 2003
- Location
- United States
- Posts
- 11,784
- Blog Entries
- 10
- Thanks Given
- 1,106
- Thanked 1,474x in 1,194 Posts
- Rep Power
- 158
Re: pugilistic physics
In the classical theory of electromagnetism, one Mobius cycle is called a period of the electromagnetic wave. The inverse of the period is known as the frequency of the electromagnetic wave. The wavelength of the wave is defined as the speed of the wave divided by this defined frequency or Mobius cycle.
Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: ¶a(t)·¶r(t)=c²
- 11-15-2011, 10:55 AM #28Moderator
- Join Date
- Aug 2005
- Location
- United Kingdom
- Posts
- 11,625
- Blog Entries
- 5
- Thanks Given
- 296
- Thanked 896x in 724 Posts
- Rep Power
- 154
Re: pugilistic physics
It would be interesting if we could detect at what point we are on within this current cycle? Are we on the incline or decline? Originally Posted by AntonioLao
regards michael.Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
reveal herself?
- 11-15-2011, 11:07 AM #29Raider of the lost time
- Join Date
- Nov 2003
- Location
- United States
- Posts
- 11,784
- Blog Entries
- 10
- Thanks Given
- 1,106
- Thanked 1,474x in 1,194 Posts
- Rep Power
- 158
Re: pugilistic physics
Currently, the universe is observed to be expanding and this expansion is accelerating.
Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: ¶a(t)·¶r(t)=c²
- 11-15-2011, 11:10 AM #30Moderator
- Join Date
- Aug 2005
- Location
- United Kingdom
- Posts
- 11,625
- Blog Entries
- 5
- Thanks Given
- 296
- Thanked 896x in 724 Posts
- Rep Power
- 154
Re: pugilistic physics
So we are still on the upward cycle at present then. Originally Posted by AntonioLao
regards michael.Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
reveal herself?
Reply With QuoteThread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.1.11
Copyright © 2012 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright © 2012 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:25 PM.
vBulletin 4.0 skin by CompleteVB
