Welcome to the ToeQuest.
Page 2 of 21 FirstFirst 12345612 ... LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 209

Thread: fusing topology

  1. #11
    Raider of the lost time
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    11,784
    Blog Entries
    10
    Thanks Given
    1,106
    Thanked 1,474x in 1,194 Posts
    Rep Power
    158

    Re: fusing topology

    My answer is that the quantum of the space-time continuum is dualistic that is composed of two distinct topologies: the H-plus and the H-minus.
    Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²

  2. #12
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Posts
    11,625
    Blog Entries
    5
    Thanks Given
    296
    Thanked 896x in 724 Posts
    Rep Power
    154

    Re: fusing topology

    Quote Originally Posted by AntonioLao View Post
    My answer is that the quantum of the space-time continuum is dualistic that is composed of two distinct topologies: the H-plus and the H-minus.
    That is a good answer,Ying and Yang again.


    regards michael.
    Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
    reveal herself?

  3. #13
    Raider of the lost time
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    11,784
    Blog Entries
    10
    Thanks Given
    1,106
    Thanked 1,474x in 1,194 Posts
    Rep Power
    158

    Re: fusing topology

    It is always Yin and Yang together, which can never become separated into one Yin or one Yang.
    Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²

  4. #14
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Posts
    11,625
    Blog Entries
    5
    Thanks Given
    296
    Thanked 896x in 724 Posts
    Rep Power
    154

    Re: fusing topology

    Quote Originally Posted by AntonioLao View Post
    It is always Yin and Yang together, which can never become separated into one Yin or one Yang.
    Yes that's right they are forever a pair.


    regards michael.
    Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
    reveal herself?

  5. #15
    Raider of the lost time
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    11,784
    Blog Entries
    10
    Thanks Given
    1,106
    Thanked 1,474x in 1,194 Posts
    Rep Power
    158

    Re: fusing topology

    But pairs of only Yin or pairs of only Yang must be allowed to calculate zero mass.
    Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²

  6. #16
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Posts
    11,625
    Blog Entries
    5
    Thanks Given
    296
    Thanked 896x in 724 Posts
    Rep Power
    154

    Re: fusing topology

    Quote Originally Posted by AntonioLao View Post
    But pairs of only Yin or pairs of only Yang must be allowed to calculate zero mass.
    Right,I see.Just one and not the other pair.


    regards michael.
    Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
    reveal herself?

  7. #17
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Posts
    11,625
    Blog Entries
    5
    Thanks Given
    296
    Thanked 896x in 724 Posts
    Rep Power
    154

    Re: fusing topology

    Quote Originally Posted by AntonioLao View Post
    But pairs of only Yin or pairs of only Yang must be allowed to calculate zero mass.
    BTW,congrate's on reaching 10000 posts,here's to the next 10000!

    regards michael.
    Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
    reveal herself?

  8. #18
    Raider of the lost time
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    11,784
    Blog Entries
    10
    Thanks Given
    1,106
    Thanked 1,474x in 1,194 Posts
    Rep Power
    158

    Re: fusing topology

    I wish I can convert these posts into dollars by a factor of 100 then I have a million dollar.
    Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²

  9. #19
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Posts
    11,625
    Blog Entries
    5
    Thanks Given
    296
    Thanked 896x in 724 Posts
    Rep Power
    154

    Re: fusing topology

    Quote Originally Posted by AntonioLao View Post
    I wish I can convert these posts into dollars by a factor of 100 then I have a million dollar.
    That would be really nice,let's ask Robert for a sub!


    regards michael.
    Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
    reveal herself?

  10. #20
    Raider of the lost time
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    11,784
    Blog Entries
    10
    Thanks Given
    1,106
    Thanked 1,474x in 1,194 Posts
    Rep Power
    158

    Re: fusing topology

    You get your million first and i'm next in line.
    Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²

 

 
Page 2 of 21 FirstFirst 12345612 ... LastLast

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Back to top