Welcome to the ToeQuest.
Page 1 of 21 1234511 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 209

Thread: fusing topology

  1. #1
    Raider of the lost time
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    11,784
    Blog Entries
    10
    Thanks Given
    1,106
    Thanked 1,474x in 1,194 Posts
    Rep Power
    158

    fusing topology

    At 1:45 AM on November 22, 2011, the fusing topology was resolved. Right about the lingering but unusually heavy rain storm announced its departure from the vicinity of Downtown Plano community. This resolution is no other than that is observed where and when a piece of bar magnet is broken into two pieces. The following descriptions served to record this awaken slumbering mental observation.


    The topology of a piece of bar magnet is either an H-plus or an H-minus regardless of in whatever direction the north-seeking pole or the south-seeking pole is pointing. However, if the bar magnet is broken into two pieces then the separate pieces retain the same fusing topology. This particular observation asserts that this distinct topology is independent of the physical shape of the three dimensional structure at the junction of the broken edges. Although a completely fitted reattachment of the broken pieces must follow the contour of the jagged edges, the fusing topology must be different since an H-plus cannot fuse with an H-plus and neither can an H-minus fuse with an H-minus. In order to fuse, either of the two broken pieces must exercises a 180° rotation. This semi-circular rotation is equivalent to the inherent half-twist of every Möbius topology. This twist transforms an H-plus topology into an H-minus topology, vice versa. Applying the same principle to the fusion of two deuteron nuclei, either deuterons must performs the same 180° topological twisting at the infinitesimal local region of each pair of deuteron nuclei required by a theory of proximity. This infinitesimal operation is equivalent to the quantum mechanical Pauli exclusion principle for two electrons to occupy the same quantum state orbital if and only if their spins are opposite of each other.
    Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²

  2. The Following User Says Thank You to AntonioLao For This Useful Post:

    mkirkpatrick (11-29-2011)

  3. #2
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Posts
    11,625
    Blog Entries
    5
    Thanks Given
    296
    Thanked 896x in 724 Posts
    Rep Power
    154

    Re: fusing topology

    Quote Originally Posted by AntonioLao View Post
    At 1:45 AM on November 22, 2011, the fusing topology was resolved. Right about the lingering but unusually heavy rain storm announced its departure from the vicinity of Downtown Plano community. This resolution is no other than that is observed where and when a piece of bar magnet is broken into two pieces. The following descriptions served to record this awaken slumbering mental observation.


    The topology of a piece of bar magnet is either an H-plus or an H-minus regardless of in whatever direction the north-seeking pole or the south-seeking pole is pointing. However, if the bar magnet is broken into two pieces then the separate pieces retain the same fusing topology. This particular observation asserts that this distinct topology is independent of the physical shape of the three dimensional structure at the junction of the broken edges. Although a completely fitted reattachment of the broken pieces must follow the contour of the jagged edges, the fusing topology must be different since an H-plus cannot fuse with an H-plus and neither can an H-minus fuse with an H-minus. In order to fuse, either of the two broken pieces must exercises a 180° rotation. This semi-circular rotation is equivalent to the inherent half-twist of every Möbius topology. This twist transforms an H-plus topology into an H-minus topology, vice versa. Applying the same principle to the fusion of two deuteron nuclei, either deuterons must performs the same 180° topological twisting at the infinitesimal local region of each pair of deuteron nuclei required by a theory of proximity. This infinitesimal operation is equivalent to the quantum mechanical Pauli exclusion principle for two electrons to occupy the same quantum state orbital if and only if their spins are opposite of each other.
    Well done Antonio,we will ignite the ultimate fusion before too long.

    regards michael.
    Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
    reveal herself?

  4. #3
    Raider of the lost time
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    11,784
    Blog Entries
    10
    Thanks Given
    1,106
    Thanked 1,474x in 1,194 Posts
    Rep Power
    158

    Re: fusing topology

    The technical engineering problem might be insurmountable: Take a pair of deuterons hold one of them still while doing a spin flip of the other.
    Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²

  5. #4
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Posts
    11,625
    Blog Entries
    5
    Thanks Given
    296
    Thanked 896x in 724 Posts
    Rep Power
    154

    Re: fusing topology

    Quote Originally Posted by AntonioLao View Post
    The technical engineering problem might be insurmountable: Take a pair of deuterons hold one of them still while doing a spin flip of the other.
    Sounds rather painful to me and well nigh impossible.

    regards michael.
    Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
    reveal herself?

  6. #5
    Raider of the lost time
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    11,784
    Blog Entries
    10
    Thanks Given
    1,106
    Thanked 1,474x in 1,194 Posts
    Rep Power
    158

    Re: fusing topology

    One idea is to align a group of deuterons in certain direction while aligning another group of deuterons in the opposite direction then at the right moment fuse these two groups of deuterons for cold fusion.
    Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²

  7. #6
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Posts
    11,625
    Blog Entries
    5
    Thanks Given
    296
    Thanked 896x in 724 Posts
    Rep Power
    154

    Re: fusing topology

    Quote Originally Posted by AntonioLao View Post
    One idea is to align a group of deuterons in certain direction while aligning another group of deuterons in the opposite direction then at the right moment fuse these two groups of deuterons for cold fusion.
    That would take some very accurate positioning would it not.

    regards michael.
    Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
    reveal herself?

  8. #7
    Raider of the lost time
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    11,784
    Blog Entries
    10
    Thanks Given
    1,106
    Thanked 1,474x in 1,194 Posts
    Rep Power
    158

    Re: fusing topology

    It becomes simpler by magnetic field alignment of the spin of each deuteron.
    Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²

  9. #8
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Posts
    11,625
    Blog Entries
    5
    Thanks Given
    296
    Thanked 896x in 724 Posts
    Rep Power
    154

    Re: fusing topology

    Quote Originally Posted by AntonioLao View Post
    It becomes simpler by magnetic field alignment of the spin of each deuteron.
    Yes easier to get ones head around it.


    regards michael.
    Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
    reveal herself?

  10. #9
    Raider of the lost time
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    11,784
    Blog Entries
    10
    Thanks Given
    1,106
    Thanked 1,474x in 1,194 Posts
    Rep Power
    158

    Re: fusing topology

    My question remains why no one can detect the magnetic monopole?
    Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²

  11. #10
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Posts
    11,625
    Blog Entries
    5
    Thanks Given
    296
    Thanked 896x in 724 Posts
    Rep Power
    154

    Re: fusing topology

    Quote Originally Posted by AntonioLao View Post
    My question remains why no one can detect the magnetic monopole?
    Maybe cause its not there? Or is so hidden it cannot be found.


    regards michael.
    Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
    reveal herself?

 

 
Page 1 of 21 1234511 ... LastLast

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Back to top