Was there a Fleischmann-Pons fusion?

[AntonioLao]

But not equally lateral as in equilateral?

[mkirkpatrick]

But not equally lateral as in equilateral?

Of course not,however we need a even base to start from.


regards michael.

[AntonioLao]

Both squares and equilateral triangles can tessellate the totality of the space-time continuum but the triangles are more compact.

[mkirkpatrick]

Both squares and equilateral triangles can tessellate the totality of the space-time continuum but the triangles are more compact.

We need to be more compact I feel.


regards michael.

[AntonioLao]

That is why the strong nuclear force is the strongest of all fundamental forces.

[mkirkpatrick]

That is why the strong nuclear force is the strongest of all fundamental forces.

Then that has to be our choice then,has it not?


regards michael.

[AntonioLao]

It means compactness also is happening in the distribution of the quanta of the space-time continuum.

[mkirkpatrick]

It means compactness also is happening in the distribution of the quanta of the space-time continuum.

Sounds like the way to go.


regards michael.

[AntonioLao]

That is the way of nature's economy. Natural forces always follow the path of least resistance. Analytical mechanics (also used by quantum mechanics) called this the Lagrangian energy function guided by a principle of least action. In a quantum theory of the space-time continuum, this is replaced by a principle of double least action and the conserved physical quantity is the square of energy as the difference of square of kinetic energy and square of potential energy.

[mkirkpatrick]

That is the way of nature's economy. Natural forces always follow the path of least resistance. Analytical mechanics (also used by quantum mechanics) called this the Lagrangian energy function guided by a principle of least action. In a quantum theory of the space-time continuum, this is replaced by a principle of double least action and the conserved physical quantity is the square of energy as the difference of square of kinetic energy and square of potential energy.

I think I see where you are heading here.

regards michael.